Saturday, April 09, 2016
More on ICNIRP from Dariusz Lesczcynski
As written by DL on Between A Rock and A Hard Place on April 8, 2016
Is ICNIRP reliable enough to dictate meaning of science to the governmental risk regulators?
This post is a follow up to my posts published on April 4 and April 5.
In my two last blog posts, last two blog posts ‘ICNIRP did it again…’ and ‘Mike Repacholi responds to ICNIRP did it again…’, I presented several reasons why the current modus operandi of ICNIRP is prone to provide unreliable and skewed evaluation of the scientific evidence on EMF and health.
I was strongly opposed by Mike Repacholi, Chairman Emeritus of the ICNIRP, scientist who is responsible for the “birth” of this organization.
In my opinion the major problems of ICNIRP are: SNIP
Read the post here.