Monday, October 21, 2013

Correspondence with Washington State Legislators and Officials


Correspondence with Washington State Legislators and Officials

In October 2013, 378 Government Officials and Professional Leaders across Washington State received the Smart Meter and Personal Wireless Services Facilities Notice of Liability and Inaction, providing  knowledge of:
  • The harm caused by exposures to Radiofrequency Radiation, a possible carcinogen, neurotoxin, and genotoxin, among other effects
  • The potential liabilities to persons given authority to act upon said knowledge, but do not.
Radiofrequency Radiation is everywhere in our society; However, government exposure standards:
  • Are 17 years old, based on limited data from one set of experiments in the 1980’s
  • Apply to 30-minute exposures to a 6-foot tall man
  • Are believed to protect us from burns and shock, not damage to health
  • Are believed to protect us from whole-body heating not exposure to critical organs like the brain and the eyes
Radiofrequency Radiation has not been proven biologically safe for humans and is especially damaging to children and pregnant women. For example, schools use Wi-Fi power densities and frequencies similar to those used as Cold War weapons. Other exposures to Radiofrequency Radiation include cell phones, cordless phones, DECT products,  Bluetooth, iPads, wireless interactive white boards, paging systems, countless home automation applications, cell towers, masts, antenna, smart meter infrastructures, Wi-Max, TETRA, etc.

Complete the NOTICE OF SUPPORT FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION by following these easy steps.

Washington State residents can let their District Legislators know they support an immediate and complete safety review of Radiofrequency Radiation, and a moratorium on the installation of smart meters and Personal Wireless Services Facilities, until determined safe.


Full Citations for Smart Meter and Personal Wireless Services Facilities Notice of Liability and Inaction.

http://www.meansforchange.com/page/Correspondence-with-Washington-State-Legislators-and-Officials

LA schools leader wants to slow iPad rollout Published: October 15, 2013


LA schools leader wants to slow iPad rollout

Published: October 15, 2013

 — The leader of the nation's second-largest school district moved Tuesday to put the brakes on an ambitious $1 billion plan to place iPads in the hands of every student after some of the first to get them used the devices to tweet, text and play games rather than study.
Under a revised plan, all 650,000 students in the Los Angeles Unified School District would have iPads to use by the end of 2015 rather than the original target date of 2014. Principals and certified teachers at all of district campuses would have the extra time to attend orientation programs on the use of the devices.
"I am hopeful that this revised plan meets the concerns of board members over how best to provide our students with the technology they need to excel in the classroom and succeed in their careers," Superintendent John Deasy said in a statement.
Concerns were expressed last month that the original target date was too ambitious after more than 300 students at three of the first campuses to receive iPads quickly cracked their security settings and began surfing the Web.
Several students at Roosevelt High School said they went on Facebook and YouTube. Others said they downloaded games from various sites and played them in class. Some, however, said they cracked the codes so they could actually do research for school assignments.
The district is spending $1 billion to buy the iPads and wire every school with WiFi. It recently distributed the devices at 47 campuses.
Deasy proposes handing out the next batch by April to three dozen of the district's campuses most lacking in technology. Other schools would get them between August 2014 and December 2015.
The Board of Education is expected to consider the revised proposal at a special meeting on Oct. 29.
Deasy said it's important to get the tablets to students quickly because computerized state testing is being introduced in 2015.

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/10/15/3040476/la-schools-leader-wants-to-slow.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/10/15/3040476/la-schools-leader-wants-to-slow.html#storylink=cpy



Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/10/15/3040476/la-schools-leader-wants-to-slow.html#storylink=cpy

Mystery humming keeps Hampshire villagers awake


Mystery humming keeps Hampshire villagers awake

Environment Agency experts are investigating a mysterious humming noise that is keeping people awake at night.

Mystery humming keeps Hampshire villagers awake
The troubled area is centred around Hythe, near Southampton Photo: Solent
The puzzling noise starts at 10 pm and drones on all night, making it impossible for residents living near Southampton to nod off.
Some people have even moved away from the affected areas and are sleeping on friends' sofas to escape the nightmare.
Experts have now launched an investigation into the cause of the low-frequency drone that began several months ago.
The troubled area is centred around Hythe, near Southampton.
It is not far from the Fawley oil refinery in Hampshire which produces 270,000 barrels of crude oil a day.
The site is owned by oil company ExxonMobil and is home to a chemical plant that produces 750,000 tonnes of chemical products each year.
But the noise is also being heard further afield and local residents do not believe it is to blame.
The New Forest District Council and the Environment Agency are now working together to bring an end to the ordeal.
Val Cacchi, a teacher from Fawley, went to the doctor begging for sleeping tablets.
She said: "It's a pulsing, droning noise, rather like an aeroplane that never quite goes over.
"Over the past week it has become considerably worse and lasts all night."
Mrs Cacchi, 54, lives near the refinery and initially thought the huge petrochemical complex might be to blame.
She added: "I discovered that a number of my colleagues were suffering in the same way.
"They live all along the Waterside and I realised it was unlikely to be Esso because of the distance involved.
"I contacted the port authority to find out if they were dredging, but they said they were not.
"I've been to the doctor in desperation and got some sleeping tablets. I also spend some nights on a friend's sofa to try to get some sleep.
"I've lost days at work through feeling so awful. Other people have been to the doctor believing they've got tinnitus.
"One person is seriously considering early retirement as she feels she's no longer able to cope with day-today life.
"It's got to the stage where you almost dread going to bed at night because you don't know if you're going to get any sleep or not."
Christine English, who lives in Fawley and sells stairlifts and wheelchairs in her shop in nearby Hythe, has also been troubled by the mystery hum.
The 61 year old said: "It's a very loud humming noise that only happens at night.
"I notice it when I go to bed and all the other sounds have stopped. But no one can pinpoint where it comes from - that's the weird thing."
A refinery spokesman added: "There is a lot of industry in the Waterside area apart from us.
"We are aware of the issue and know that New Forest District Council is trying to identify the source of the noise."
A council spokesman said it had received ten complaints, mostly from people living in the Hythe and Dibden Purlieu area.
She added: "Due to the large amount of heavy industry along the Waterside area the Environment Agency and the council's environmental health teams are working together to establish the cause of the noise.
"Out-of-hours monitoring is to be carried out as part of the investigation."

​'Casualty catastrophe': cell phones and child brains (E26)


​'Casualty catastrophe': cell phones and child brains (E26)

October 20, 2013 08:45

Watch Video

Download video (70.25 MB)
Insurers stop covering for cell phone use, called the next 'casualty catastrophe' after tobacco and asbestos; phone manufacturers hit with a class action and personal lawsuits; and the warning deep inside your mobile.
Seek truth from facts with Ellie Marks, whose husband Alan is suing the industry for his brain tumor, 'cell phone survivor' Bret Bocook, leading radiation biologist Prof. Dariusz Leszczynski, Microwave News editor Dr. Louis Slesin, Storyleak editor Anthony Gucciardi, and former senior White House adviser Dr. Devra Davis.
RT:My name's Daniel Bushell. Class action lawsuits filed against cell phone manufacturers. Coming up…
Announcer:
‪Insurers refuse public liability for cell phones.
The warning buried deep inside your mobile.
And the next 'casualty catastrophe' after tobacco and asbestos.
Keith Philips, brain tumor survivor: I would hold my cell phone here and the tumor was right there.
Stuart Cobb, brain tumor survivor: I always held it on my right side, right here. The industry should have put these warnings on these phones a long time ago.
RT:Professor Dariusz Leszczynski is one of the world's leading radiation biologists, and brave. He knew phone manufacturers would try to end his career for printing groundbreaking research, proving cell phones do cause biological damage.
Professor Leszczynski joins us, great to see you. How did the industry react?
Prof. Dariusz Leszczynski, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland:So far I think I didn’t experience any smear campaign. But in my case it was just that the industry used their influence to prevent funding of my research projects.
RT:But studies like Professor Leszczynski’s now allow top neurosurgeons to issue a stark cell phone warning.
Dr. Keith Black, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center neurosurgeon: It's essentially cooking the brain.
RT:Ellie Marks' husband Alan suffered serious memory loss after years of using a mobile.
At 2am one night he had a massive seizure. Surgeons found a tumor the size of a golf ball right where he held the phone.
Ellie, thank you so much for joining us. Why are you and so many others suing the industry?
Ellie Marks, wife of brain tumor victim:There’s many many many others that are already deceased from this and are dying from this, younger than my husband. Some as young as 28 who are deceased and their neurosurgeons actually told them that it was probably their cell phone use.
We had about 20 cities and states that wanted to legislate as San Francisco had and they were all threatened with lawsuits by this industry.
RT:This is a photo of Bret Bocook's brain. The top quarter responsible for body balance has had to be removed after surgeons found this vast tumor right where he held the phone.
A US national rowing champion, now he can barely move.
Bret, great to speak to you, tell us about the class action lawsuit against the phone industry.
Bret Bocook, brain tumor victim:The only way you can educate the public against big business is through lawsuits. That was how they did it with smoking. It was not until the District Attorneys in the United States got involved and sued the cigarette industry that they actually had a huge settlement, had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for public education as to the dangers of smoking.
That’s what’s going to happen with cell phones. It’s just unequivocal categorical that these things cause cancer. And also, they don’t want you to know that.
This is on the same trajectory as smoking. Because if you look at smoking in the '60s they had doctors coming on TV and saying 'Hey, smoke Marlboro, smoke this brand, because it's good for your cough.'
Camel cigarette commercial: And see how well Camels agree with your throat!
The Flintstones cigarette commercial: Winston, America's best selling best tasting filtered cigarette!
Bret Bocook, brain tumor victim: And more dangerous for children, because their skulls are a lot thinner. At least you can’t buy cigarettes unless you’re 18. But even a five-year-old can go and buy a phone.
RT:For phone manufacturers young children are targets. There are now working cell phones even for babies.
PCMag phone review: The glowPhone is for kids maybe five to eight and the flyPhone is for tweens.
RT:Samantha Miller's funeral was on her 18thbirthday.
Phone use through childhood first gave her headaches, reports the Daily Mail, then the brain tumor that killed her.
In the West, brain tumors have overtaken leukemia, notes Senator Lyn Allison, as the number one child killer illness.
But doctors warn that's the tip of the iceberg.
Clinical studies find young men who keep phones in their pockets have much lower chances of producing offspring, while women often store them on their chest.
Tiffany Frantz, breast cancer victim: I would just tuck it into my bra.
RT:Tiffany Frantz got breast cancer aged just 21, right where since childhood she's stored her phone.
These spots mark the areas of Donna Jaynes' cancer. Her doctors call this a ‘new breed of distribution’ that exactly matches where women keep their phone.
Dr. John West, Chairman, Breast Care Center:It’s a very unusual pattern where these multiple small cancers were confined to the upper inner aspect of the breast, I’ve never seen anything quite like this.
RT:This is a radiation detector, in normal surroundings around 30 microvolts/meter (µV/m).
Microwave ovens reach 800 µV/m. Wi-Fi routers use the same radiation technology.
Loading a film on a tablet PC reaches 2,000 µV/m.
Some of the world's best selling smartphones register over a thousand times above normal levels.
Insurers have in fact stopped covering cell phone manufacturers for public health.
Insurance firms privately call cell phones the next public ‘casualty catastrophe’ after asbestos and cigarettes.
Phone manufacturers have now quietly inserted a legal disclaimer.
On iPhones you have to go to Settings, General, About, at the bottom scroll down to Legal and at the end – RF Exposure, Radiofrequency Exposure.
Unlike most pages, the small print here can't be enlarged, but it reads: ‘Carry iPhone at least 10mm away from your body’
At the same time the industry says all its studies show phones are perfectly safe.
Thomas Wheeler, CTIA phone lobby head:Radio waves from cellular phones are safe.
RT:A 'conflict of interest' Harvard ethics professor Lawrence Lessig calls industry paid studies, which consistently conclude phone radiation is harmless.
Independent scientists meanwhile overwhelmingly find the most serious problems, from DNA damage to three times lower sperm counts, 290% more brain tumors, autism and birth defects.
Former senior White House advisor and leading epidemiologist Dr. Devra Davis has testified to Senate on the subject she joins us, great to see you.
How do you explain the completely opposite findings between industry and independent studies?
Dr. Devra Davis, author of Disconnect: Anytime there was independent research, what industry would do was three things: first they would go attack the scientists who have done the studies, they would try to get them fired, they’d try to get their funding taken away or they would accuse them of fraud.
When that didn’t work they hired other scientists who knew nothing about the field to do studies that looked like they were replicating the other studies but they really weren't.
And when all of those things failed, they wrote a memo in which they said if the cellular industry has done its job we think we war-gamed the science. That’s a quote - ‘war-gamed’ the science. Now science is not a matter of war, and it’s not a matter of games; we’re deadly serious about our health and that of our children.
RT:War-gaming, reveals this leaked Motorola document, is industry paid studies purely for reassuring the public.
Norman Sandler, Motorola: We have sufficiently war-gamed the issue.
RT:A sting has exposed how easy to get phoney studies in print.
Posing as a serious scientist, John Bohannon sent in a paper full of schoolboy errors, offering payment for publication.
Incredibly more than half the journals in these countries all around the world published it, even lying to the public that the study had been peer reviewed.
Investigative journalist Anthony Gucciardi has broken numerous health scandals, great to see you.
Surely big business wouldn't fake studies to put millions of lives at risk. Do we have documented precedents?
Anthony Gucciardi, Storyleak editor: This is exactly like Eli Lilly which in the 1980s knew that Prozac was leading to suicides and aggressive behavior, the exact opposite effect ofwhat they wanted. They knew that in the 1980s after they conducted the research. They hid the research and it wasn’t exposed until 2005 from the BBC.
But then they would have their corporate interests do studies and talk about how great it was. Now of course they’re required to admit that antidepressants do cause suicide, aggressive behavior, pretty much every shooter is on them.
When these cell phone companies are forced to admit that cell phone radiation does cause brain tumors, that it does do all this, and they’re already saying this in their manuals, so it’s already coming up. But once the public is aware of this fact, it will be even worse than antidepressants, it will be even worse than tobacco.
RT:We invited the powerful phone industry lobby CTIA to discuss the issues raised in this report.
They sent a one-line refusal.
CTIA phone industry lobby:Thank you for contacting us, but we will not be able to do this interview.
RT:The industry's most respected journalist is Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News since 1981.
Louis, great to speak to you, there seems to be a parallel universe of what the industry says and everyone else.
Dr. Louis Slesin, Microwave News editor: The whole system is broken. People are not being told the truth, it's crazy. You know it's easy to say we made a mistake on tobacco after we know that tobacco’s a killer.The point is to take action.
RT:Action IS being taken outside the US.
France is moving schools back from Wi-Fi to cabled Internet.
Countries from Germany to Israel and Finland are moving to stop cell phone sales to kids.
But Obama just made industry chief lobbyist Thomas Wheeler head of the regulator itself, the FCC.
A former administration official calls it another astonishing conflict of interest.
So doctors who want parents at least informed of cell phone dangers to their kids say they aren't holding their breath.
Seek truth from facts. This is The Truthseeker.
http://rt.com/shows/the-truthseeker/manifacturers-cell-phone-warning-447/