Tuesday, March 19, 2019

New Website on Fiber - Connected Communities

And message from Oona: 

Connected Communities - a site that provides tools for building community-owned wired fiber networks, as an alternative to wireless 5G,  is here! Connected Communities ~ Wired fiber for Sustainable Last-Mile Solutions  http://connected-communities.ca

Although the site is Canadian-focused, its content will be helpful to citizens and local governments everywhere. I want to say a special thank you to Tim Schoechle as his work in this area of `Re-inventing Wires`has been a tremendous support to me.

The press release announcing the launch is attached. Feel free to share it, and thank you for being on this journey with me,


Link to Press Release for new website: 

Finnish Citizens seek to ban 5G Technology in Finland owing to its Adverse Impact on Human Health

Santosh Kumar, The Swiss Times, March 18, 2019

Finland, being home to leading 5G technology developer Nokia, has played a key role in development and deployment of commercial 5G cellular technology. Ironically, as other countries are preparing to roll out 5G networks soon with help from Finland’s Nokia, a group of Finnish citizens are seeking to ban the 5G technology from Finnish grounds completely stating threats to human health from the higher electromagnetic radiations.

Helena Ertz is leading a group of 2,300 backers in a petition to the government which seeks to completely ban 5G technology on the ground that the relatively higher density of 5G base stations from their 4G predecessors increases the exposure of citizens to potentially hazardous radiation. Ertz claims that despite warnings about harmful effects of 5G frequencies on human health by doctors and scientists from multiple countries, the government has brushed the claims aside.

The country’s history of being an experimental ground for creating and testing several cellular technologies makes the 5G situation ironic. Finnish citizens have been first adopters of the 5G networks and there have been countless opportunities before to raise concerns.

University of Oulu and the Finnish government have already started a flagship research to develop next generation 6G wireless communication networks. Elsa became one of the first carrier to launch 5G commercial network. The small Nordic country has a disproportionate contribution in the development of cellular technology.

Small groups in U.S and European cities have popped up seeking either ban or delay of 5G network rollout while waiting for conclusive research on the potential health effects of 5G technology. These local health-focused movements are trying to stop the 5G rollouts but also has loss of zoning revenues and aesthetics as some of their concerns.

The claim that 5G’s new millimeter wave signals and higher concentrations of sub-6GHz radio waves could cause severe damage to human cellular structures, has not been proven by any research study. The petition also claims that 4G, 3G, 2G and Wi-Fi have impacted the human brains, reduced fertility and increased the risks of cancer and that 5G roll out will increase these effects to new levels.

These claims have been dismissed by governments and electronic engineers. Radio waves are non-ionizing which are not capable of penetrating into human body or cause any changes in human cellular structure, experts say. No health impacts have been found from high frequency emissions form airport body scanners, satellites and microwave ovens.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has adopted a wait-and-see approach and suggested that further research is needed to conclusively determine the impact of cellular devices on human health. The response of Finnish government will have to be watched. For the petition be officially considered by the Finnish government, 50,000 signatures are needed and now only 5% of the needed numbers have signed the petition.

FCC opens up experimental spectrum licenses for 6G

5G has barely gotten off the ground, and US regulators are already looking to the next big thing in wireless
The Federal Communications Commission is paving the way for 6G and beyond. 
On Friday, the agency unanimously voted to open up "terahertz wave" spectrum that could one day be used for 6G services. The spectrum, which falls in the 95 gigahertz (GHz) to 3 terahertz (THz) range, will be open for experimental use to let engineers dreaming of the next generation of wireless begin their work. 
The spectrum, once thought of as useless, could offer super high speed internet service for data intensive applications, such as super high resolution imaging and sensing applications. 
Through its rules, the FCC will give innovators a 10 year license to experiment with new products and services. 
"Today, we take big steps towards making productive use of this spectrum," FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement. "This will give innovators strong incentives to develop new technologies using these airwaves while also protecting existing uses."
The vote comes just as US wireless operators are starting to roll out 5G service. AT&T turned on its 5G network in a dozen cities at the end of last year. This year it plans to boost its coverage to 21 cities. So far, AT&T has launched only one device that can use its 5G network, a mobile hotspot. Verizon, which will be the first US carrier to sell the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, is launching its mobile 5G service in Chicago and Minneapolis next month. Meanwhile, T-Mobile said it'll launch in 30 cities, while Sprint will launch in nine cities in 2019.
Wireless researchers, such as Ted Rappaport, a professor at NYU who's been leading research in millimeter wave technology for 5G, say access to this spectrum will help the US stay ahead in wireless. 
"Now, with the Spectrum Horizons initiative and this historic vote, the FCC has launched the race to 6G, helping to ensure the US will play a leading role in future generations of wireless," Rappaport said in a statement.  
Last month, many in the tech community scoffed at President Donald Trump's mention of 6G in a tweet. Trump proclaimed he'd like to see "5G and even 6G technology" deployed in the US "as soon as possible." But Rappaport said it's never too early to think of the next generation of technology.
"President Trump mentioned 6G a few weeks ago -- perhaps the first world leader to do so," he said. "As an engineer and educator, I'm happy to know our country's leaders are working to support American competitiveness in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)."
But this spectrum isn't without its challenges. Like millimeter waves, which are used for 5G, this terahertz spectrum has propagation characteristics that require very short transmission distances and line-of-sight transmission. This means signals won't be able to penetrate obstacles, like walls, and would be subject to interference from things like trees or changes in weather. 
So far, actual applications that could use this super high frequency spectrum haven't been demonstrated or really even imagined. But researchers are already thinking about the future. Later this month, scientists and engineers will gather in Oulu, Finland, for a 6G Wireless Summit.
Still, FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel said, "there is something undeniably cool about putting these stratospheric frequencies to use and converting their propagation challenges into opportunity." 

The Word "SMART" is a military acronym for "Secret Militarized Arms in Residential Technologies"

Could it be any more obvious that this is a war against humanity?

Unlocking the door: How to successfully get through to people about wireless radiation.

By: Rachel Gaunt: For years I have been talking to people about the risks of wireless radiation. People who already “get it” are an easy audience. They nod and agree vehemently. But conversing with people who are new to this subject has not been so easy.
Too often I see their eyes glaze over, watch them shift uncomfortably, or frown and get defensive. The more I ramp up my passion about the subject the more they retreat.
As someone who has worked extensively in the field of communication and consumer motivation, I’m no stranger to activist campaigns, but this was a new level of puzzle. Why didn’t these folks – my family and my dear friends -want to hear the truth about some critical information pertinent to their health?
I used to fantasize that if I just got the exact right message or the right order of facts, they would magically come around and see the light.
But if there was one exact right message I hadn’t yet found it.
It wasn’t until I conducted some creative concept focus groups that I glimpsed the answer. This small-scale qualitative research helped me see what NOT to do. It also shed light on a way to get through the defense and reach people successfully.
Today I feel like there is a way to get through to people. It is not magic, it is a particular four step formula that I want to share.
Step One: Making the Invisible Visible
First off, the opening gambit has to change their worldview. It has to affect them viscerally. It is not enough to appeal to their rational brain alone, it has to touch their whole being, head, heart and instinct…. something they feel deep in their gut. It is only a visceral response that changes their worldview and opens the door.
Having tested several creative concepts with parents, the one concept that consistently got everyone’s attention used SOUND. With a concept entitled, “If your ears could hear what your body can feel,” I would show them what wireless radiation sounds like with my meter.  I use this  High Frequency meter.
I showed them what their phones sounded like, what their routers sound like and just like that – bang – the ground shifted. What was once invisible is now visible – or in this case audible – and having heard it, it cannot be unheard.
“Wow” said a friend and colleague the other day, “when you were talking earlier about all the research I thought you sounded like a crazy lady, but now I get it.”  “Next time,” she added helpfully, “you should skip all the factual intro and just get your meter out.”
And she’s right. It is this sound shock that gets people’s attention. They are now listening in a way that they weren’t before. They can see that there is something there that needs attention.
Sound gets their attention and proves that wireless radiation is real and powerful.
Step Two: Factual back up
Step Two is to quickly back it up with one or two, (maximum) brief, credible facts. Visuals help.
Two visuals I have found to be effective:
First is an x-ray image of a woman with two cell phone shaped tumors on the underside of each breast, (from a women who works in a cell phone factory with phones passing under her breasts all day).
The other image that gets good response is the pie graph visual showing the difference between the studies done by tech companies versus the studies done by independent companies.
Younger men show concern about sperm damage. Parents are concerned by the fact that brain cancer is now the leading cause of cancer among children. Don’t overdo this part. It is just enough to share some credible sourced research that they can grasp quickly. The important part is to move on to Step Three as quickly as possible because this is where they want to go.
Step Three: Easy steps to protect themselves
At this point they want to hear about solutions. They are engaged and want to know how to keep themselves and their family safe – but without having to give up too much or make big changes in their lives.
Step Three is to offer a few easy steps they can implement right away. Reassure them that they aren’t going to lose anything important. They will not want to give up their smart phone or their wireless internet access at home. Remember this is the first step on the path towards education – you want them come along with you and be an advocate, not get caught up in defending their current behavior. So make their first steps easy and painless.
For example:
  • Don’t sleep with your phone – get a $10 alarm clock instead
  • Put your phone on airplane whenever you don’t need it.
  • Keep your phone out of your jeans pocket or bra.
  • Buy a Signal Tamer (a protective fabric cover to fit over your home router) to reduce your wireless signal, and if possible unplug it at night.
  • Refrain from using your phone in the car, unless lost and needing a map.
You get the picture. Focus on small baby steps that they can do, and feel good about. Take it one step at a time, and above all make them feel supported and clever for being one step ahead of this issue – never judged.
In this way they become part of the growing number of people in the know, and can pass information along to their networks.
Step Four: Normalization
The last step is small, but significant. Let them know that thousands of smart, forward thinking people are doing the same thing. They are taking small steps to protect themselves from their powerful tech gadgets. They are in good company. They are taking care of their family, and themselves.
People want reassurance that they are part of a growing number of people doing the right thing. Interestingly, a recent study found that when it came to recycling, people were more motivated by the message that all their neighbors were recycling, than facts about the effect of recycling on the planet.
As 5G wireless looms and the tide of politics and corporate power grows stronger, I try to remind myself about the way that movements start. They start at the bottom with handful of well-informed passionate people telling the truth.
As you all continue tell the truth in the world please feel free to try out this “sound” approach and make the invisible visible. I believe it is the first step to opening the door.
Good luck!

Excellent Letter from EMF Safety Network to Sebastopol Planning Commission

The US Department of the Interior states RFR threatens birds, and criticizes the FCC’s radiation guidelines, stating,“the electromagnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today.” Two hundred forty-one bird species suffer mortality risk from both tower collisions and from exposure to the radiation towers emit. This includes birds that are endangered or threatened, Birds of Conservation Concern, migratory birds, and eagles. Studies of radiation impacts on wild birds documented nest abandonment, plumage deterioration and death. Birds studied included House Sparrows, White Storks, Collared Doves, and other species. Studies in laboratories of chick embryos documented heart attacks and death. 
Scientists in Germany studied tree damage in relation to wireless radiation from 2006-2015. They monitored, observed and photographed unusual or unexplainable tree damage, and measured the radiation which the trees were exposed.“The aim of this study was to verify whether there is a connection between unusual (generally unilateral) tree damage and radio frequency exposure.” They found significant differences between the damaged side of a tree facing a phone mast and the opposite side, as well as differences between the exposed side of damaged trees and all other groups of trees in both sides. The scientists concluded, “Statistical analysis demonstrated that electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone masts is harmful for trees.”  

The following studies show insects are harmed by radiation:
  • Food collection and response to pheromones in an ant species exposed to electromagnetic radiation found exposure to radiation caused colony deterioration and affected social insects’behavior and physiology. 
  • Oxidative and genotoxic effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields in the earthworm concluded radiation caused genotoxic effects and DNA damage in earthworms. 
  • Mobile Phone Induced Honey Bee Worker Piping. The study abstract states,“The worldwide maintenance of the honeybee has major ecological, economic, and political implications.”  Cell phone RFR was tested for potential effects on honeybee behavior. Handsets were placed in the close vicinity of honeybees and the sound made by the bees was recorded and analyzed. The information revealed that active cell phone handsets induced the bees worker piping signal. “In natural conditions, worker piping either announces the swarming process of the bee colony or is a signal of a disturbed bee colony.” 

The following are observations by International scientists of RFR effects on nature:
“Migratory birds -- incredibly important to the global economy and for the ecological services they provide -- now appear to be negatively affected by non-ionizing radiation.” Dr. Albert19 Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations.  Manville, Adjunct Professor, Johns Hopkins University; Senior Wildlife Biologist, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS), Emeritus/Retired 
“Man-made electromagnetic fields impact all living organisms, acting first on the unit membrane. We must reduce our dependence on 'wireless' technologies, reduce the numbers of masts (i.e., cell towers), of Wi-Fi apparatus, of cordless phones and so on, and clearly indicate, in public spaces, the intensity of the ambient electromagnetic field.” Prof. Marie-Claire Cammaerts, PhD., Free University of Brussels, Faculty of Science, Belgium...
A meta-analysis of studies on millimeter waves (MMWs) “State of knowledge on biological effects at 40–60 GHz” states, “At the cellular level, it stands out from the literature that skin nerve endings are probably the main targets of MMWs and the possible starting point of numerous biological effects.”  Effects reviewed include effects on capillaries and nerve endings, protein insults, epigenetic regulation, and the risk of homeostasis disruption, which would have dramatic consequences. In addition, millimeter wave technology has been developed as a crowd control weapon which causes acute burning pain, as if the body is on fire.
Read the entire, well-researched, well-documented letter here:

Mark Steele speaking in Central London - 5G and the Rule of Law - Violations of the Nuremberg Code

Please share this with everyone you know its crucial we go beyond the ask.

This is about the Rule of Law. 5G We have had it confirmed by US Congress hearing that “No” published research or work has been carried out that shows this technology is safe, only the opposite. That is illegal and unlawful confirming that this technology cannot be tested on populations and is a breach of the Nuremberg code. 

Mark Steele Will be talking in Central London on Thursday 21st of March. Share this with interested parties to kick of our campaign informing and resisting this crime. The meeting place is Nelsons column and event room is 2 min walk. 



We are raising a fund through Crowd Justice campaign.



This funding is so that we can bring a test case against the Gateshead Council in the first instance.  I made a promise to everyone that when the time was right we would go on the offensive that time is now. We are waking up Mankind across the World to this crime that has occurred in Secret against him and the environment.

Mark Steele

Inventor and Patent Writer



+44 (0)191 4187755

Reevu on Facebook


The unregulated fitment of 5g hazardous technologies across the country in your towns cities and countryside has started in total disregard of the law by local government agencies and authorities that include known hazardous led lighting systems a carrier technology for the 5g coverage radiation emission blanket.
My local authority Gateshead Council has orchestrated a criminal case and civil cases to silence me with the criminal appeal listed for the 28th of March 2019. 
Their then use of taxpayers money to launch a civil court action in an attempt to take away my freedom of speech and gag me failed and they are now attempting once again to use the legal system to silence me. 
We implore all those who have a care about our hard fought for freedoms, democratic values, rule of law, and the rights of mankind to live in a toxic-free environment for the sake of our children to please support this legal challenge by contributing now and spreading the world with your friends and family and on social media.
They are seeking to imprison an honest citizen for speaking out about their covert activities namely the fitting of dangerous technologies that they didn't at first comprehend due to their complete disregard of the law. 
This is bigger than just my case
This legal funding for our campaign will enable our legal team to bring the countries first test case against Gateshead Council in relation to this technology and allow others to use this case and law to challenge their local authorities. 
Our case will put to the test how untested and unregulated technology can be fitted by authorities without their adherence to the law, as well as their actions taken against me and others for speaking out to authority on their wrong doing. 
It will be for the case to set out that these untested unregulated technologies have no place in our towns villages and cities drawing on my technical expertise.