An industry funded researcher critisizes donations as conflict of interest
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CYP/is_1_115/ai_n27171883/
CONCLUSIONS: The interpretation of results from studies of health effects of radiofrequency radiation should take sponsorship into account.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/cellphone-child-brain-cancer-study-flawed-critics/story?id=16082731#.T5U_CNkZRXt
"Responding to the criticisms, Martin Roosli, author of the original study, said Morgan and his colleagues provided no explanation for the fact that rates of brain cancer among children and adolescents in Nordic countries have remained relatively stable for the past 20 years, despite increasing use of cellphones.
''And to be honest, since the funding of the Environmental Health Trust depends on donates, I would not call this independent,'' Roosli [Martin Röösli] said.
FSM funded researcher http://www.mobile-research.ethz.ch/english/personen_e.htm
also see http://www.mobile-research.ethz.ch/english/sponsoring_e.htm)
Most recently appointed a Member of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.
From Mona Nilsson:
The non-increase in Noric countries is a myth that is being promoted by industry-funded scientists like Röösli and Feychting and the ICNIRP guideline faithful cartel of experts.
The Nordic trends are heterogenic: Norway shows increasing trends while Sweden, known for reporting problems and low quality registries show flat trend.
In Denmark there is a 40% increase in brain tumours among men between 2001 and 2010.
In Sweden most brain tumours that are not analysed by a pathologist are not reported to the registries. A recent government report shows that Sweden has a serious lack of pathologists: 100% more or the double are needed.
In spite of these facts, Röösli choses to spread the myth about the Nordic brain tumour trends
Mona Nilsson
Informant: Iris Atzmon
CONCLUSIONS: The interpretation of results from studies of health effects of radiofrequency radiation should take sponsorship into account.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/cellphone-child-brain-cancer-study-flawed-critics/story?id=16082731#.T5U_CNkZRXt
"Responding to the criticisms, Martin Roosli, author of the original study, said Morgan and his colleagues provided no explanation for the fact that rates of brain cancer among children and adolescents in Nordic countries have remained relatively stable for the past 20 years, despite increasing use of cellphones.
''And to be honest, since the funding of the Environmental Health Trust depends on donates, I would not call this independent,'' Roosli [Martin Röösli] said.
FSM funded researcher http://www.mobile-research.ethz.ch/english/personen_e.htm
also see http://www.mobile-research.ethz.ch/english/sponsoring_e.htm)
Most recently appointed a Member of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.
From Mona Nilsson:
The non-increase in Noric countries is a myth that is being promoted by industry-funded scientists like Röösli and Feychting and the ICNIRP guideline faithful cartel of experts.
The Nordic trends are heterogenic: Norway shows increasing trends while Sweden, known for reporting problems and low quality registries show flat trend.
In Denmark there is a 40% increase in brain tumours among men between 2001 and 2010.
In Sweden most brain tumours that are not analysed by a pathologist are not reported to the registries. A recent government report shows that Sweden has a serious lack of pathologists: 100% more or the double are needed.
In spite of these facts, Röösli choses to spread the myth about the Nordic brain tumour trends
Mona Nilsson
Informant: Iris Atzmon
No comments:
Post a Comment