New paper published today where we make the following points:
- In studies of RF health and biological effects where simulated signals are used to estimate exposure, unreliable results are likely produced. These can lead to false assurances of public safety.
- In studies where real cell phones are used to measure actual exposure, studies are almost uniform in showing adverse effects -- more than 95% do so. This is because the real phone signals are polarized, variable in form, and therefore more bio-active than simulated estimates. As such, organisms are not able to readily adapt and compensate for damage.
- Studies that do not use real signals do not reflect the reality of use in the population and are therefore of limited scientific and public health protection value.
Dr. George L. Carlo