Cell Phones - Cell Towers - Haarp. An EMF Triple Threat
Part I - Cell phones
When it comes to cell phones dangerous side effects, the cat is
out of the bag. Public awareness has grown regarding their dangers. Nations
worldwide have adopted legislation curtailing the use of cell phones by
children. Stacks of scientific papers published by leading universities and
research institutes all point to the same conclusion: cell phone use
causes loss of bone density, cardiac arrhythmia and brain cancer, to name a few
of the more serious effects, though there are many others. (1. 2. 3. 4)
A cell phone is only as good as its signal. No bars = no
talking. All cell phones depend on being "in range" of a tower. If
one is getting a signal, then that person's body is receiving the cell tower's
electromagnetic radiation right along with the phone. The measurement of a cell
phone's power is defined by Hertz. A hertz is a unit defining the frequency of
an electromagnetic wave.
A basic understanding of human physiology is required to
comprehend the dangers we face. The human body is a self-contained electrical
"machine". We create this electricity through the action of eating
food which our system converts into electrical power. When Morpheus held up a
battery in front of Neo, he wasn't kidding; we are batteries,
if boiled down to a final analysis.
The human body functions best while operating at around 10
hertz. Note the above figure of a person on the far left. This is our safe, or
natural zone. Within our bodies, hundreds of millions of cells each have their
own electromagnetic field (EMF). Key to remaining healthy is maintaining the
delicate balance of these EMFs. Cancer is caused by cellular mutation. A
disturbance to the electromagnetic field (a deviation from our balance of 10
hertz) at a cellular level leads to a disruption in the normal operation of the
cell, in turn leading to improper function, resulting in mutation, which can
morph into cancer. Pretty basic stuff. Granted, this article is dealing in
overviews, and of course there is an enormous amount of data not addressed
here; but that does not change the general hypothesis.
Before Marconi and his radio; before there was any EMF
not part of the natural cycle of the self-contained bubble of life that is
earth, human beings were in harmony with the planetary EMF. With the
introduction of the radio, our bodies became recipients of artificially
introduced electromagnetic frequencies. Radio waves are not so damaging, as
they operate fairly close to our natural, harmonious balance with nature. But,
the key here is, the higher the frequency, the farther away from 10 hertz. The
farther away, the more damage is wreaked on our cells.
To understand how damaging cell phone electromagnetic radiation
is to us, recall that we operate at 10 hertz. 100 hertz equal 1 kilohertz. 100
kilohertz equal 1 megahertz. The average EMF emitted by cell phones is 1900
megahertz, with a market shift toward (currently in use) 2500 megahertz phones
(5). Essentially, we are being saturated 24/7 with many, many thousands times
stronger radiation fields than our body is equipped to deal with. Our failure
to deal with this onslaught is manifesting in the form of stress and sleep
disorders, birth defects, cancer and Alzheimer’s. We are being silently culled,
and footing the bill to make it happen! By paying your cell bill, you simply
ensure the continuity of a product that is killing, and will kill, millions and
millions of people. There is a coming wave of brain tumors that will decimate a
percentage of our population. Sixty years ago, autism was 1:50,000. Today it's
1:50. Vaccines are the primary cause of autism, but cell towers and a constant
bathing in radioactive electromagnetic frequencies are playing their part as
well (Graph - 6).
Enough about cell phones. If you don't know the dangers by now,
you either don't want to know, refusing to believe something
so terrible is happening (Our old pal, cognitive dissonance), or you are
choosing to roll the dice with cancer and an early death for the sake of (or
fear of) being without the constant ability to reach and be reached. Either of
these is a poor substitute for proactively addressing the reality of our EMF-drenched
world.
Part II - Cell Towers
Cell towers operate in Watts. A watt is a standard definition of
a unit of power. An example of how wattage affects the amount of electricity
used can be found in light bulbs. While a normal, round incandescent light bulb
uses 40 to 100 watts, fluorescent bulbs produce the same amount of light using
only five to 30 watts (7). So, lower wattage equates to less electricity
expended to produce a desired result.
It is here we delve into nefarious conspiracy facts. There is no
"theory" involved in this conspiracy, as the facts presented can be
easily validated through numerous credible sources. Seeking empirical
truth? Visit your nearest cell tower and look for a squat metal box with thick
cables coming out of it and snaking up to the tower array. You will be looking
at an electrical power transformer - almost every cell tower is constructed
with one at the base. A transformer is designed to increase the power output,
or watts. They are attached to cell towers to boost the power of the EMF
signal. The $10,000 question, therefore, becomes: Why do
our cell towers requires so much juice? To put the amount of power they use in
perspective, consider the following.
A WiFi signal from any standard router is 20 milliwatts. This
low output signal can be picked up blocks away from the router, penetrating
walls and distance. A standard cell phone transmits 300 milliwatts. Broadly
defined, as cells operate at 30 watts, a perfectly capable cellular
"node", or tower, would be equipped with a 30 watt transmitter. Right
here is where the shills and disinfo crew will vomit reams of science debunking
this simple fact. The fact is: transformers pumping out
hundreds of thousands of watts, if utilized to that purpose, would not only fry
the phone, but quite likely (at the hazard proximity we share with them) cause
a plethora of physical damages to our tender 10 hertz wiring. This being the
case, we come full circle to the question of why so much power is needed when
the reality is that an infinitesimal fraction will do the trick.
Consider also that a cheapy walkie-talkie, bought at Walmart or
Radio Shack can connect with its mate up to two miles away, and do so at
.0000001% of the power output of a cell phone. Consider also that radio station
WLS in Chicago pumps out a formerly impressive 50,000 watts, and can be picked
up over a 1000 miles away with a middling quality radio receiver. The average
cell tower in the USA pumps out between 100,000 to 500,000 watts. As
demonstrated in factual examples related in this paper, if 30 watts will do the
job, then why have nodes pulsing at up to half a million watts?
Is that much power required? No, it is not. As recently as
2013, there were very few cell towers in Mexico, though cell reception was on
par with the USA in clarity; not to be confused with "blanket coverage of
all areas". This coverage in Mexico was accomplished with small, 8”-10”
low power cell antennas connected to buildings and rooftops. No towers. No
transformers. A standard wall outlet provides ample power to maintain a signal
with the same clarity as found in the USA. If a tiny antenna is fine for the
task, then why do we have these all over the place?”
Is it because we have more cell phones than them, and so need
bigger, stronger towers? No. Our percentage of cell phones to population is
very similar. See full table for all countries here (8).
Can it be there is an ulterior motive, or motives, above and
beyond a strong signal, in equipping these towers with up to half a million
watts of transmitter power? Yes there is. Several in fact.
Recalling the beginning of this article, you will note that the
human body is a self-contained electrical unit. The human brain is a biological
computer and, like a computer, it has a clock frequency that all your existence
is centered around. This is a little basic because your brain in reality has
multiple simultaneous clock frequencies which interact with each other and
serve different purposes for biological function, whereas a microprocessor,
standard desktop computer, normally has only one central clock that everything
in it synchronizes with. In contrast, your visual cortex may process at a
different frequency than the section of your brain which regulates your
heartbeat. Feelings and thoughts will run at another frequency. Because
your brain is an ultra-parallel computer, it can accomplish a lot while using
frequencies that are far lower than would be practical in a microprocessor, and
these frequencies are in the ELF (extended low frequency) range. The
fact that your brain operates on frequencies leaves it susceptible to
manipulation via electronic means. Since different moods are reflected by
different frequencies, it is possible to electronically force people to be
relaxed when they should be angry, laugh when they should be appalled, and give
loyalty when they should rebel (9).
The manipulation of our emotions in such a fashion can only be
accomplished with an enormous amount of delicately tuned and precisely directed
EMF emissions. Like the 1988 classic movie, They Live, the means
are in place and are being used against us to
"obey", to have "no independent thought".
An unpublicized function of cell towers is weather modification.
To promulgate such a suggestion is to be ridiculed in extremis. You know you've
hit the nail on the head when trolls come out from under their rocks to
misdirect, vilify and ultimately debunk or negate the posit.
Just as we are electrical in nature, so too is the atmosphere
itself. Lightning should serve as ample proof of this. The fact is that all
things in our known existence operate on an electromagnetic frequency. Indeed,
we human beings, unaided with scientific gadgets, experience a minuscule 4% of
the total EMF range. That being so, with the proper influence, found in
directed energy via "cell towers", these frequencies can be tampered
with, in the form of directed energy pulses; creating tornadoes, earthquakes,
weather pattern manipulation and more. Our seemingly harmless "cell"
towers act as relay stations to piggyback energy pulses to wherever
directed.
Wondering how a cell phone tower can generate a strong enough
EMF to influence weather patterns, cause earthquakes, stir up hurricanes?
Consider this: there are an estimated 269,989 (15) cell towers in the USA
(with more added daily). Let's be generous and lop off 170,000 of them as being
nothing more than what they are promoted to be - a benign cellular phone tower.
This leaves 100,000 towers with a (very conservative) estimate of 150,000 watts
of power each. 100,000 X 150,000 yields a mind-boggling 15 billion watts.
When they are directed and synchronized to a specific purpose, it becomes quite
evident that the juice is there to cook up just about any weather condition
sought. For perspective on how much power that is, understand that the Haarp
array in Alaska is a trifling 100 million watts output, and consider the
weather modification damage caused at that relatively low power output. The USA
Haarp facility is but one of 8-10 of these arrays situated throughout the
globe. The war of pulse energy weapons isn't found only on Star Trek reruns
- it's here, and it's live!
How can we be completely sure that cell towers do not require
100,000 – 500,000 watts to provide a clear signal for these little
cancer-causing pocket pals? For those doubting Mexico's lack of towers yet
enjoying great reception, we look to Australia's 3G networks. Down Under, 3 watts,
when put through highly directional antennas, is enough to reach 2 miles and
justify having cell nodes (towers) spaced 4 miles apart. With 10 nodes per
tower, that equals a total radiated power of 30 watts; which is more than
enough to penetrate virtually anything and provide excellent coverage.
In establishing that 30 watts, (Yes, just thirty)
per tower, with towers spaced 4 miles apart, provides ample power to penetrate
everything other than our "under renovation" sub-subterranean secure
facility for COG, or Continuity of Government, in Cheyenne Mountain. Let's just
call it "the globalist bug-out hideaway".
A logical question to pose is this: If a mere 30 watts is
required to effectively transmit signal, and photovoltaic panels can generate
and store sufficient solar power to meet the demands, why do we have these huge
transformers? Some basic math will help us in understanding how inexpensive a
genuine tower can be.
With solar power now costing approximately three dollars a watt,
including inverters, panels, and backup batteries, you can equip a 10 node cell
tower with a thousand watt solar setup for approximately $3,000 and never need
to worry about installing a transformer at all. If you are transmitting 30
watts, you will draw at least 45 watts because of waste. The hardware is going
to eat some juice, but that should not come out to over 100 watts more. So
let's just agree that one cell tower has a real power need of 150 watts. A 1000
watt solar setup will handle that without breaking a sweat. With low wattage
running a high voltage feed to a cell tower so it can get its 300,000 Haarp
watts and not fry out without a transformer only confirms ever
more securely that a transformer is not required. Utilizing solar panels,
if cell transmission were the only purpose, makes a great deal of economic
sense (11). Something is rotten in our red, white and blue Denmark. A
150' tower ranges in cost from $100,000 up to $300,000 per unit (12), with
additional costs to lease ground for the tower itself. Leases run on a low end
of $100 per year (for suckers willing to be irradiated 24/7 for $8.33 per
month) up to $156,000 per year (13).
Power - Solar? 1000 watts, which exceeds nine times over the
wattage requirements - $2,499.65 (14).
Pole not included. But in truth (Ola', Mexico?) an 8” antenna
plugged into a wall socket will meet the needs. So why are they
150'-200' tall?
Current USA set-up? Up to $300,000 just for the pole! Add
in transformers costing thousands of dollars each, and the invisible cost of
the power grid required to keep them online. Last I checked, corporations
existed for profit, except when willing to take a hit to help realize an
unpublished, secretive objective.
A common sense question is: If cell towers are so
dangerous, then why would the 1% largely responsible for our current state
subject themselves to the EMF fields? Answer? They don't!
Picking a town of familiarity, as a Saint Louis, Missouri native,
it is well known and proven that there is a concentrated "wealth
band" running from the center of the city, starting around Clayton, all
the way to west Saint Louis County. This "corridor" is where all the
money lives (a generalization, but accurate).
From the words “St Louis” and projecting out toward Clayton,
Creve Coeur and beyond reside the 1%. It is a fact - ask any native for
validation.
Now let us look at another map, this one noting cell tower
placement in St. Louis. You will note Creve Coeur, Chesterfield and Town
& Country are mysteriously almost "tower-free". Town and
Country is ranked 80th in the nation for highest per capita income (16). Not
even shown is uber-rich Ladue. Hmmm....coincidence? I think not.
If you think that big green area free of towers is a fluke,
please perform the same search in most major metropolitan areas - it's the same
everywhere. This alone validates the dangers of cell towers. If the 1% want
nothing to do with them, then rest assured neither do we.
Part III - Haarp
The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or Haarp, in
Alaska is well known by now, at least to those even semi-awake. The
acknowledgement of Haarp as a method of controlling the weather is not a
secret; indeed, it is a stated function as published by the US Government.
This high-tech facility, operated by the US Navy, Air Force and
several universities, is an extremely powerful transmitter that (very
simplistically put) directs intense energy beams into the ionosphere with the
goal of influencing: jet streams, creating rain or drought, tsunamis,
hurricanes and other uses as well. This ultimately is equivalent to
"cooking" our ionosphere. Haarp, however, is limited by the curvature
of the earth; hence its range of manipulation is finite.
This is where cell towers come into play. Cell towers can be
"harnessed" in their power, allowing for focused energy bursts within
a tightly held geographical area. The signal can be bounced tower to tower
until reaching its destination.
There is an enormous mountain of data supporting the following
theories of Haarp and cell tower shenanigans in relation to the following
recent events.
*California, drought -
Between chemtrails and ionospheric manipulation, the government
has artificially created the drought in California. Combine the lack of water
from mountain snowfall, and the new saying gains weight. “Water is the new
oil”. Sounds like the movie Omega Man is coming soon to a
theater near us. While this huge drought affecting our entire nation is
wreaking havoc on human lives, agriculture and the nation's economy, the Bush
family quietly buys land known to have water under it. The Nestle company does
the same, then bottles it and charges exorbitant prices for an earth
resource! When one party controls the supply, creates a demand, then
provides the solution, the "have nots" are at the mercy of the
'haves'. The depth of out-n-out evil exhibited by these soulless wealthy
so-n-sos is almost beyond belief, but then, truth is stranger
than fiction. Drinking kitchen tap water is not a life-embracing solution,
unless one is comfortable drinking fluoride, a proven neurotoxin. They
get us coming and going!
** Katrina - hurricane - The Haarp facility was highly active
in the weeks prior, during, or shortly after Katrina became a hurricane out of
Tropical Depression Twelve. The colored "slots", resembling piano
keys, are visual reflections of Haarp activity in the area Katrina was active.
This is called a "waterfall chart". The vertical axis is a frequency
reading, measuring from 1 to 30 MHz (10).
The graphic above displays Haarp activity when Tropical
Depression (DT) Twelve forms. Katrina grew out of TD12. Note the lack of
"slots" found at the vertical 5 and the horizontal 2 axis point.
Compare to below, when Katrina hit New Orleans.
If Haarp were inactive during this time range, 08.22 to 08.30,
then there would be nothing to discuss here. But wait! These graphics come from
Haarp's own website! These days, evil is "loud n' proud"!
*** Tsunami - Japan - The tsunami that destroyed Fukushima
Nuclear Power Plant is worldwide news. One of the capabilities of Haarp is to
direct energy to a specific spot. A highly credible theory is that, an energy
beam was shot into the ocean along a known fault line. The result was a
sub-surface earthquake which resulted in the tsunami.
There are a great many more examples, but one gets the idea. All
information here was found online. None of it is secret. Disbelieve? Go do the
research if still in doubt. Check Bosnia, North Korea, Haiti, Malaysia to get
the gears in motion.
Why does the United States, ostensibly the most scientifically
advanced country on earth (to hear our scientists), lag behind
our supposedly less developed fellow nations when it comes to public awareness
of the dangers of cellular phone usage? Why the silence?! Why
do companies like Sprint and AT&T market cell phones to young children,
knowing full well children's skull and periosteum are not fully developed, thus
amplifying the danger of radioactive frequency immersion? The answer, hard as
it is to swallow, is that the combined effects of cell phones, towers and Haarp
are designed to sow death. Slap a slick marketing campaign
together, bash it into public consciousnesses, and we end up with fools waiting
at dawn outside retailers for the "next generation" cell phone. It's
all quite Pavlovian...and sad.
A medical catastrophe is in the making...right now!
It's a metaphorical tsunami on the horizon; targeted at and composed of
today's children, which a now smaller percentage of will become tomorrow's
adults. A horrific percentage of our toddlers will, in their twenties or
thirties, develop cranial tumors and lesions, bone marrow destruction, loss of
intellect and many other vile maladies. A wave of death is approaching, and as
much as I abhor it, I won't shrink from trying to enlighten others to what is
coming down the pike.
Who is to blame for this? Cell companies? Certainly.
Parents? Certainly. Squished between child peer pressure,
convenience, cognitive dissonance, a media-induced apathy (from cell
towers...oh, the irony!), and uber-slick marketing campaigns, the majority of
parents and people continue to use them. In essence, we are like cows in
a Far Side cartoon. Picture a line of cows leading into a
building called "Slaughter House". One cow comes up to another to
hear the approached cow say, “Hey! No butting!”
Sheer madness it is to fund these companies that knowingly are
giving us cancer and a host of other ailments. One can recall that the earth
continued to turn and life continued to exist...all without a cell phone for,
oh, roughly 6,000 years some will reckon. How did we evolve into pansies not
daring to leave home without one? Anyone with a lick of common sense will
cancel their service, throw out the phone and share this article. It
really is a matter of life and death.
3. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/01/06/cell-phone-use-brain-cancer-risk.aspx
This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment