Dr R M Powell: Biological Effects from RF Radiation – Implications for Smart Meters and Smart Appliances
Home → Health
Effects → Dr R M Powell: Biological Effects
from RF Radiation – Implications for Smart Meters and Smart Appliances
Dr Powell’s excellent chart shows
clearly that the limits imposed on the public in the US and UK do not protect
us from RF radiation bio-effects, including cancer, neurological damage,
oxidative stress, cell damage, sperm damage, etc. We have added UK limits to
this embedded graphic for illustrative purposes.
Applied physicist and Harvard PhD, Dr Ronald M Powell,
has authored a very useful document showing the harmful effects of
electromagnetic radiation in the context of Smart Meters.
Of particular note is the Biological Effects Chart which
Dr. Powell presents – providing a succinct graphical representation of data
taken from Bioinitiative 2012 – an
extensive review of the medical research literature on the biological effects
from electromagnetic fields. The purpose of the Chart is to show the
radiofrequency (RF) exposure levels at which biological effects were found in
67 studies from the RF Color Charts of the BioInitiative 2012 Report, and then
to compare those exposure levels to the following:
(1) current FCC Maximum Permitted Exposure (MPE) limits
that govern Smart Meters and Smart Appliances in the United States [note that
by understanding that UK exposure
limits are based on ICNIRP standards it is also easy to compare
exposure levels from a UK perspective - Ed.]
(2) new biologically based RF exposure limits proposed
in the BioInitiative 2012 Report
(3) calculated RF exposure levels produced by a single
Smart Meter at various distances
(4) calculated RF exposure levels produced by a single
Smart Appliance at various distances
In the report, Powell explains that the comparison
indicates the following:
(1) The current FCC Maximum Permitted Exposure (MPE)
limits are so high that they provide no protection for the public from the
biological effects found in any of the 67 studies [by implication the UK
MPE limits likewise provide no protection - Ed.]
(2) New biologically based RF exposure limits proposed
in the BioInitiative 2012 Report are 1 million times lower than current FCC
limits and would protect against the biological effects found in nearly all
of the 67 studies.
(3) A single Smart Meter on a home can produce RF
exposure levels that caused the biological effects found in either most or many
of the 67 studies, depending on the distance from the Smart Meter.
(4) A single Smart Appliance in the home can produce
RF exposure levels that caused the biological effects found in nearly half or
fewer of the 67 studies, depending on the distance from the Smart
Appliance. Multiple Smart Appliances in a home multiply the total exposure.
(5) A single Smart Meter on a nearest neighbor’s home
can produce RF exposure levels that caused the biological effects found in many
of the 67 studies. A given home may have one to eight nearest neighbors,
each with a Smart Meter, multiplying the total exposure in the given
home.
Other observations:
(1) Most biological effects of RF exposure cannot be
sensed by human beings. Examples are the onset of cancer, DNA
damage, and fertility effects. One category of effects that can
often be sensed includes neurological effects on sleep, memory,
learning and behavior.
(2) Unborn and very young children may be more
affected by RF exposure than adults. This document provides background
information, an explanation of each feature of the Biological Effects Chart,
and a detailed discussion of each of the conclusions and observations
summarized above.
The report can be downloaded here: http://marylandsmartmeterawareness.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biological_Effects_from_RF_Radiation_and-Implications_for_Smart_Meters_June_11_2013_B.pdf
- See more at:
http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/dr-r-m-powell-biological-effects-from-rf-radiation-implications-for-smart-meters-and-smart-appliances/#sthash.eB5BmcrB.dpuf
http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/dr-r-m-powell-biological-effects-from-rf-radiation-implications-for-smart-meters-and-smart-appliances/
Uhoh. I’ll get straight to the point – that ‘paper’ is a complete lie. What started alarm bells ringing was what sort of doctor would reference their name? Or use Wikipedia? And base their work on multiple other studies which are not referenced? The answer: no Harvard graduate would, and in fact none have done so as this Ronald Powell doesn’t actually exist – there was no graduate from Harvard with that name in 1975 and in fact had never been a Harvard graduate with that name. Spreading such misinformation on EMF helps no one
ReplyDelete