Sunday, April 10, 2016

Levels of Man-made Artificial Radio-frequency in Comparison to Natural Background Levels: A Compilation of Comments

Levels of Man-made Artificial Radio-frequency in Comparison to Natural Background Levels: A Compilation of Comments

Hi Everyone,

I would like to thank everyone who has taken the time to reply with such valuable information on this issue. It is very much appreciated.

I have compiled and listed the comments in chronological order in which, for the most part, they were received. I am also attaching documents that I received from some people along with the comments.

I would like to suggest that we draft a statement with regards to this on which we all can agree so that when we present this information to the public, it is clear and accurate, and we are on the same page with regards to this.

I also welcome further discussion on this topic.

I will post this to this short list now and later on post it to my greater list. (Note: If you have not signed up for the EMF Refugee AWeber account, please do so that you can continue receiving EMR updates, as I will no longer be using gmail to send out my mailings [since they have started spamming my mailings]. If you have not received an invitation, let me know, and I will send you one.)

Kind regards,

Paul Doyon
EMF Refugee
Electromagnetic Safe Planet

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:13 PM, EMF Refugee <> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

Can someone tell me how many times the natural level of EMF we now have with man-made artificial EMF? I have heard a number of different numbers over the years and I would like to get the most accurate estimate at present with regards to this.


Paul Doyon
EMF Refugee
Electromagnetic Safe Planet (ESP)

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Andrew Michrowski <> wrote:

Here is what we have reported in 2005, based on the backdrop of the research by E. Tell of the US EPA:

Whole Life Expo 2005 Toronto, November 27, 2005


New problems with cellphones

Andrew Michrowski, Ph.D.
The Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc
100 Bronson Avenue, Suite 1001 OTTAWA, Ontario K1R 6G8  (613) 236-6265; fax: 235-5876

The level of typical exposure to cellphone-related emissions has more than doubled for most Canadians in the last 5 years. This exposure has interacted with vaccines, common drugs and may be responsible for the genetic variations of Asian flu and E Coli distribution. Although sensitivity and absorption of these emissions is not the same for all, children are more vulnerable then adults. What can soon happen on a large scale in Canada has already occurred in Japan where MDs specialize in pathologies related from cellphone emission exposure, with limited success.

In our growing dependence on wireless telecommunication systems, we increasingly find ourselves absorbing electric and magnetic wave emissions from these microwave systems. Although the human species has evolved amidst a broad band of these same frequencies that originate from throughout the universe, in the last few decades, human exposure to artificial, repetitive signals has risen dramatically – by more than a trillion times. We can even compare the average United States exposure to radiofrequency and microwave fields in 1980 (0.005 microWatt/cm2) with that of 1999 (1.0 microWatt/cm2) we note a 200-fold increase, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. We can only expect further quantum leaps in exposure as the plans of investors, the military and other government agencies materialize: to have every dwelling, school, office and store in the world become a microwave transmitter for wireless computers and related linkages, and to have transceivers implanted within our bodies as guardian “digital angels”.

To wit: about a trillion times less than 0.005 microWatt/cm2.
Andrew Michrowski
The Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc.
OTTAWA, Ontario K1R 6G8

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Michrowski <> wrote:

The symbol for micro, appeared wrongly in the copy: so it should have read: 1 microWatt per centimetre square. [Corrected above. paul]
Andrew Michrowski
Please explain to all the others.
Remember: this refers only to the radio-frequency microwave bands that were know in those days: radio & TV stations, emergency, radar, walkie-talkies and the near 10 GigaHertz transcontinental communication systems + military bands also around 10 GHz and above.
That does not include the power-frequency upwards.
Andrew Michrowski

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Carlos Sosa <> wrote:

Dear Paul, 

Please take a look at Erica's conference:


Video: Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD at the Commonwealth Club of CA, June 22, 20...

Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD is Founder of Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment (PHIRE) in th...

Please take a look at Olle Johansson's  estimate included in Full Signal Documentary, between minutes 3 and 4:


Full Signal - The Hidden Cost of Cell Phones

Full Signal - The Hidden Cost of Cell Phones

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:59 AM, EMF Refugee <> wrote:

... According to Video: Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD at the Commonwealth Club of CA, June 22, 2015 (hd) it is now as high as a Quintillion. And Olle Johansson stated that it was 1 million billion (or a Quadrillion) times in the movie Full Signal in 2010.


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Stop Smart Meters! UK <> wrote:

Hi all,

I understand that ICNIRP is just under 1 quintillion times higher than background (1018  or 1 million million million) based on an avg. level of background radiation of 0.000,000,000,010 µW/m² (which I have seen referenced several times) and ICNIRP allowances of 9,000,000 µW/m².

When you compare the two using an example of physical distances (which most people can then visualise), it is shocking.  I have attached three slides which I use to illustrate it.

If the level of background radiation we evolved with were to be the equivalent length of a standard piano keyboard (1.5m), then the amount of radiation allowed to enter your brain using ICNIRP standards (and from each individual wireless device you own) would be the equivalent distance of 4.5m trips to the Sun and back.

As we know, less protected body parts will receive even higher exposures than this — and so will children.

Best wishes,


PS - please feel free to set me straight if these numbers are wrong.

Stop Smart Meters! UK

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Olle Johansson <> wrote:

Dear Paul,

It is frequency-dependent (and also note: the artificial waves are soooo (!) different compared to natural signals when it comes to other physical characteristics, like polarization, pulsation, modulation, etc., so they are exactly just that: artificial).

For 1,800 MHz the difference compared to natural background is in the order of a quadrillion-to-a-quintillion - 1,000,000,000,000,000 - 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 - times (cf. ICNIRP and IEEE/FCC guidelines). Just be aware of that for many other frequencies the difference is much, much larger, and when compared correctly, may even out to an infinite (∞) times difference. I do hope that evolution has been so smart to automatically protect us against all these human inventions!

There is only one hygienic safety value ever proposed (based on the 1,800 MHz analogy):

0.000001-0.00000000001 µW/m2 – this is the natural background during normal cosmic activities; proposed by Olle Johansson, Karolinska Institutet 1997, as a genuine hygienic safety value.

Always keep this in mind. I know some people try to steal the attention from this fact, but never be fooled by that. I proposed this; no one can deny it. And now I propose it again for safety - and as my opinion.

With my very best regards
Yours sincerely

(Olle Johansson, associate professor
The Experimental Dermatology Unit
Department of Neuroscience
Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:07 AM, <> wrote:

Dear Paul!

I wrote in my books and lectures (translated from German into English, do my best...): "The legally limits for the technical pulsed mobile communication microwaves are billion to quadrillion times higher than the the natural, not pulsed microwaves. The sensitive natural microwaves manage many live processes. A telephone call with a cellular phone, smartphone, cordless phone... reaches or goes beyond legally limits." 

And never forget: It is not only the dose of radiation, the field strength. Technical microwaves are pulsed and/or otherwise modulated, natural microwaves are not. A big difference concerning the biological effect.

Best from Wolfgang Maes.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Alasdair Philips <aphilips@gn.apc.orgwrote:

It is complex and varies a lot with frequency and with modulation types.

Here is a graph from a Poster presentation that Graham and I prepared for a cancer conference in 2012.
It took a lot of work to gather the information. I would welcome feedback about it.

Note that the units are as for light spectra – power flux density per Hz.
For total power in any bandwidth (e.g. 200 kHz) you need to sum the area under that part of the graph.
Easiest way to do this is to take an average level

You may freely reproduce and/or circulate it “as-it-is” i.e. with no edits, please.

Alasdair Philips
Powerwatch UK

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Roger Morgan <> wrote:

So from this knowledge and information that has been collated from a credible source, and I'm no great mathematician, at this rate of transmission and frequency when will we start to see significant cancer and mutation cases within the local human population?

i.e. 5 cases per 100, 000 50 cases 100, 000 or 500 cases per 100, 000

Kind regards

Roger Morgan

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Velma Lyrae <> wrote:

Hello Paul

I see you already have some answers from the Experts - but as I had spent time finding this thought I'd send it.

Here is a great chart - shows the different estimations 

However, the document about Schumann Resonance makes it clear it is not just about levels but about the
modulation of the frequencies

We now exist in a sea of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, never before seen in human history. The levels of artificial electromagnetic radiation have reportedly reached a quintillion (10
18) times higher than the natural background levels.

This had been reported in the Guardian so if it's good enough for them......


On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Evelyn Savarin <evsavarin@yahoo.comwrote:

I am a bit concerned by the figures that are being thrown around. I would seriously suggest whoever are making wild statements as to how strong the radiation that is now in the air should seriously acquire a good RF meter, Gigahertz solutions is not  bad.  I think, in circumstances where you are right on top of a cell tower or have a cell phone to your ear that is where you will experience 1 millwatt/cm2. Otherwise, general ambient air in a hot spots like cities full of WIFI and antennas, smart meters etc. you really don't get much above 1 microwatt/cm2 or .001mw/cm2. Radiation drops off tremendously when you get even a couple of feet from a generating wireless device. But because of the intensely complex pulsing patterns of  wireless signals, its that which gives us problems even at these lower intensites.  

But you need to be reminded that Nanowatt or .00001mw/cm2 to .0001mw/cm2 is insanely problematic with these wireless pulsing pattern that vary from device to device, and that it was assumed before man created wireless background was in the order of .00000000001mw/cm2. Thats considered to be in the fehrenwatt category and one that Bau biology seems to subscribe to . It kind of makes sense to me. 

Radiation levels don't increase just because the number of wireless devices is greater. What I think happens and this just my conjecture it fills in the empty pockets of space with more complex pulses which may feel like the intensity could be greater. Think of it as being at bottom of a waterfall where water is falling at a certain rate and pressure. Then lets add another same volume of waterand pressure  coming from another direction. Does that make it stronger or more  encompassing to the body.


EMR-Updates (Sent from a Hard-Wired Computer - for our Health)
Brought to you by  EMF Refugee™ & The International Coalition for an Electromagnetic Safe Planet (IC-ESP)(With Over 5000 Posts and Over 500,000 Views [and counting] containing articles, research studies, reports, and videos.)

Please support EMF Refugee™ & The International Coalition for an Electromagnetic Safe Planet (IC-ESP)™ by purchasing your EMF Refugee Goods at

"Our prime purpose in this life is to help others. And if you can't help them, at least don't hurt them."
- Dalai Lama

"The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it."  George Orwell

"The Autonomic system is affected by microwaves of the centimeter wave length band. These waves affect circulation, respiration, temperature control, water balance, albumin and sugar concentration in the cerebro-spinal fluid, hydrogen ion concentration, EEG, GSR, sleep, conscious awareness, etc." - W. Bergman (The Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System)

If you would like to be taken off this list, please send me an email and I will gladly unsubscribe you.

No comments:

Post a Comment