Saturday, January 30, 2016

Environmental Refugees: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) Sufferers

Environmental Refugees: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) Sufferers

The State of Maine Public Utility Commission recently received what it thinks is the ultimate verdict in the issue of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) when the Maine Supreme Judicial Court agreed with the PUC that utility companies’ smart meters are safe and not harmful to human health and safety.
Perhaps the judge who rendered that decision ought to reconsider what’s going on regarding EHS, especially at the United Nations and their conference where EHS issues were discussed.
Dr Yael Stein, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hebrew University – Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, gave an 83 slide presentation titled “Environmental Refugees” wherein Dr Stein pointed out key factors that need to be addressed in the modern age of microwave technology that super saturates humans with EMFs and RFs from cell phones and towers, Wi-Fi, utility companies’ AMI smart meters, smart phones, routers, monitors, etc. and other electronics that can send and receive data, information, voice, photographs, etc.

Dr Stein’s comprehensive presentation was before the UNESCO 10th World Conference on Bioethics, Medical Ethics and Health Law held January 6 to 8, 2015 in Jerusalem, Israel. [1]
One very prominent classification regarding EHS, pointed out by Dr Stein, is that in Sweden,electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) officially is recognized as a functional impairment and not regarded as a disease! Furthermore, there’s a published peer-review paper, “Electrohypersensitivity: state-of-the-art of a functional impairment” [2] wherein Sweden’s position on EHS is discussed. The Abstract for that paper states:
Survey studies show that somewhere between 230,000-290,000 Swedish men and women report a variety of symptoms when being in contact with electromagnetic field (EMF) sources.
Where do U.S. states’ PUCs and utility companies come off with there are no adverse health effects and that EMFs are safe?
Furthermore, the World Health Organization states,
EHS is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms that differ from individual to individual. The symptoms are certainly real and can vary widely in their severity. Whatever the cause, EHS can be a disabling problem for the affected individual.
Source: Dr Yael Stein, MD, Slide 67 of 83 / UNESCO 10th Word Conference on Bioethics, Medical Ethics and Health Law
protocol
In Slide 68, Dr Stein refers to the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and that discrimination against a person with a disability, which a functional impairment as recognized in Sweden also should be included, “is a violation of the inherent dignity and worth of the human person.” Aren’t there federal and state laws against discrimination against disability individuals [6] in the United States, and why aren’t PUCs and utilities made to abide by them?
slide 68In Slide 70, Dr Stein emphasizes via a red outline that “States Parties undertake to ensure and promote the full realization of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all persons with disabilities” to which end State Parties have certain obligations to meet and enforce, including appropriate legislative measures, which the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and other U.S. states apparently deliberately are neglecting or accommodating those who suffer with EHS by not allowing opt-outs from AMI smart meters.
slide 70Slide 73 deals with Accessibility, which would apply to an EHS person if he/she cannot live or be in an area contaminated with EMFs from AMI smart meters, Wi-Fi, etc. Consequently, those barriers or obstacles to that person’s accessibility to remain safely without adverse health effects within the home, workplace, etc. need to be eliminated or, as in the case of a personal home, allow a legal opt-out from utilities’ AMI smart meters on their homes.
slide 73Dr Stein emphasizes that EHS is being taken seriously for those who suffer with it. In file 80, he lists what are designated as EHS Refuge Zones or areas, plus support groups, in France, Canada, the UK, and Sweden. How come there’s nothing listed for the USA? Probably because utility companies and PUCs work too closely together to get all the federal funding [3-4] that’s available for creating the smart grid that eventually will lead to the Internet of Things [5].
God help us!
References:
[1] http://en.unesco.org/events/10th-world-conference-bioethics-medical-ethics-and-health-law
[2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17178584
[3] http://energy.gov/oe/technology-development/smart-grid/recovery-act-smart-grid-investment-grants
[4]https://www.smartgrid.gov/recovery_act/overview/smart_grid_investment_grant_program.html
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_of_Things
[6] http://www.dol.gov/general/topic/disability/ada
Resource:
SLIDE SHOW – Electrohypersensitive individuals (EHS) in the digital world – a disabled population, deprived of home, work and basic rights, Dr Yael Stein, MDhttp://www.slideshare.net/YaelStein1/ehs-human-rights
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Let’s talk EMF science & solutions

Let’s talk EMF science & solutions


When my wife was pregnant with our daughter, my dad instincts went on high alert. Of everything we’re confronted with, you know what my number one concern was? Electromagnetic frequencies (EMF).

EMFs are perhaps the most important health issue of our time. Thousands of studies cumulatively demonstrate serious harm. The science has spoken.

Unfortunately, with trillion-dollar promises advocating a shift to a wireless, data-harvesting spyconomy, the science has been largely silenced (see below). We urgently need accountability, and change.

In the meantime, let’s talk about EMF solutions for right here and now.

Check out these AMAZING videos from two of my favorite people. Whether you feel EMF symptoms or not, find out the facts, then how you can protect yourself and your loved ones.

A Message to Dads about Wireless Safety (6 mins) 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcY0uvVmdjQ

Reducing Your EMF Pollution — Practical Solutions (7 mins) 
https://www.emfanalysis.com/solutions-interview/



Thank you for sharing these 2 videos, and your heart, with those around you.

Onward,
Josh del Sol

P.S. - here are 7 of my favorite resources for getting the truth out – proving EMF harm, the science cover-up, and offering solutions:

* * *

EMF science: getting the truth out

1) Bioinitiative Report – RF Color Charts [hundreds of studies]
http://www.bioinitiative.org/rf-color-charts/

2) Summary of over 5,000 studies
http://www.justproveit.net/studies

3) Susan Foster: The WHO and the Scientific Coverup at the Highest Levels
https://takebackyourpower.net/tag/who/

4) CDC Retracts Cell Phone Radiation Warnings [with NY Times 2016 exposee]
http://ehtrust.org/cdc-documents-reveal-the-minimizing-of-risk-to-children-2/

5) Autism & EMF Facebook Group [community]
https://www.facebook.com/groups/AutismEMF/

6) BabySafe Project [a must for expecting families]
http://www.babysafeproject.org/

7) Resonance: Beings of Frequency [film]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS6FGzh3ygw

 
Copyright © 2016 Take Back Your Power, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as a subscriber of and/or crowd-funding contributor toward Take Back Your Power (http://takebackyourpower.net). Thank you for your support!!

Our mailing address is:

Take Back Your Power
#339 - 14241 NE Woodinville Duvall Road
Woodinville, WA 98072

Friday, January 29, 2016

AG won't seek the removal of utility regulator Robert Burns





"The Attorney General has failed the Arizona people," Woodward said Friday. "The conflict-of-interest law that pertains to ACC commissioners is not contingent on Burns' intent or excuses but whether or not he is conflicted. The record clearly shows that Burns was a registered lobbyist for a telecommunications group whose members have business before the ACC, and that Burns was registered lobbyist both before and after his election. That makes him ineligible to hold office."
Warren Woodward 



AG won't seek the removal of utility regulator Robert Burns


 Ryan Randazzo, The Republic | azcentral.com 4:38 p.m. MST January 29, 2016

(Photo: Michael Schennum/The Republic)

Story Highlights
· The Attorney General's Office will not seek the removal of regulator Robert Burns
· Like Susan Bitter Smith, who recently resigned, Burns was a lobbyist when he took office
· Burns lobbied for the telecommunications industry while campaigning for Corporation Commission

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich will not seek the removal of utility regulator Robert Burns for his lobbyist record.

Brnovic ended a months-long investigation with a letter sent to Burns on Friday.

"Our office does not have reason to believe that Commissioner Burns is usurping, intruding into, or unlawfully holding or exercising the office of Corporation Commissioner," Assistant Attorney General Brunn "Beau" Roysden wrote Friday.

Burns was elected in 2012 and in 2013 began his term on the five-member commission that regulates utilities.

Burns joined a telecommunications trade group, the Digital Arizona Council, to support a bill in the 2012 Legislature. He resigned from the Digital Arizona Council after he took office as a utility regulator in 2013, according to a letter he provided The Arizona Republic, but an affiliated group called Arizona Telecommunications and Information Council continued to list him as a lobbyist.
Late last year, when fellow commissioner Susan Bitter Smith was facing an attorney general's investigation into her work as a lobbyist for a cable television group, which is not regulated by the commission, commission officials realized Burns was still listed as a lobbyist and attempted to remove that designation.

But that didn't happen before the designation drew attention, and citizen activist Warren Woodward of Sedona filed a complaint with the Attorney General's Office seeking Burns' removal from office for the conflict of interest.

"I felt like there really was no problem," Burns said Friday, adding the decision was a relief.
Woodward said that Burns was ineligible to take office because he didn't resign from the group until after taking office.


Michael Keeling, an attorney for the Arizona Telecommunications and Information Council, told the Arizona secretary of state in a Sept. 11 letter that Burns had asked to be removed as a lobbyist before he took office as a commissioner.

The Corporation Commission regulates gas, water, telecommunications and electrical utilities, in addition to other duties. A state law prevents commissioners from serving if they have an interest in entities regulated by the commission.

"Our investigation did not find evidence that Commissioner Burns had a relationship with ATIC that would disqualify him under (Arizona law)," Roysden wrote. "Merely being listed as an authorized lobbyist with the Secretary of State is insufficient to establish a violation (of the law)."

The letter sent to Burns and Woodward said that no evidence was found to contradict Burns' claim that his registration as a lobbyist for ATIC was "simply an administrative oversight."

It said Burns "at most" coordinated with ATIC during the 2012 legislative session and that ended with the session in May that year, well before he was elected to the commission.

"The Attorney General has failed the Arizona people," Woodward said Friday. "The conflict-of-interest law that pertains to ACC commissioners is not contingent on Burns' intent or excuses but whether or not he is conflicted. The record clearly shows that Burns was a registered lobbyist for a telecommunications group whose members have business before the ACC, and that Burns was registered lobbyist both before and after his election. That makes him ineligible to hold office."


The Attorney General's Office filed a lawsuit seeking Bitter Smith's removal for her conflicts, and while she denied she had any conflicts, she resigned from office effective Jan. 4 because she said the case was a distraction.

In an unrelated matter Thursday, Burns filed a notice of investigation with Arizona Public Service Co., directing the electric utility to turn over all financial records of political contributions and lobbying.

APS is widely believed to have contributed to the $3.2 million that independent political groups spent in the 2014 election cycle to help Corporation Commissioners Tom Forese and Doug Little win office.

Burns said that such spending, if done anonymously, can harm the reputation of the commissioners. APS rebuffed Burns in an previous request to disclose such spending. It is unclear if the utility will comply with his directive or whether he will need to take action in court over the matter.

Report from the Science and Wireless 2015 event in Australia

Report from the Science and Wireless 2015 event in Australia


This, must read, report analyzing the various presentations from SCIENCE & WIRELESS 2015 was prepared for the Pandora Foundation and for the Kompetenzinitiative by Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc (biochemistry) & Kirsti Leszczynski, PhD (physics). Science and Wireless 2015 was hosted at the RMIT University in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, on December 8, 2015.

Excerpt:

Dariusz concludes in part:

Unfortunately, enthusiastic opinion of the Science & Wireless event has vanished. The S&W events organized in 2014 at the Wollongong University and in 2015 at the RMIT have not much to do with the community interaction between scientists, industry and users. S&W events in 2014 and 2015 were just presentations of science by scientists for the benefit of the industry. The real users of wireless technology, some of whom are concerned with possible/probable health risks, were clearly marginalized in 2014 and 2015. The community participants had no presentations to express their views and opinions and the opportunity to voice opinions in the discussion was severely limited by the time constraints. As of now, the Science & Wireless event cannot be called anymore a ‘Community Interaction’ event.

Read the post here.

BREAKING NEWS BERKELEY CALIFORNIA:

BREAKING NEWS BERKELEY CALIFORNIA:


Today U.S. District Court Judge Chen ruled against CTIA .  CTIA’S MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL IS DENIED allowing the City of Berkeley to distribute the following Cell Phone Ordinance information to all Berkeley cell phone buyers at the point of sale in Berkeley:

"To assure safety, the Federal Government requires that cell phones meet radio frequency (RF) exposure guidelines. If you carry or use your phone in a pants or shirt pocket or tucked into a bra when the phone is ON and connected to a wireless network, you may exceed the federal guidelines for exposure to RF radiation. Refer to the instructions in your phone or user manual for information about how to use your phone safely."

From: Ellen Marks [mailto:cabta@ellenkmarks.com]

​Contact:
Ellie Marks, CA Brain Tumor Association

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Screens Versus Brains: Are We Robbing Our Children Of The Ability To Think?

Screens Versus Brains: Are We Robbing Our Children Of The Ability To Think?


Here’s an interesting article sent in by Richard Giles. It is written by Sue Palmer who writes and speaks about child
development and education in the modern world. Her concerns mirror those of of Baroness Susan Greenfield on IT’s impacts on children

Don
****************************************

Have you been in a primary school classroom recently? Did you notice that a large white screen has replaced the old-fashioned blackboard? And have you any idea how much of the day the children spend staring at it? In the classrooms I’ve visited, the ‘interactive whiteboard’ features in almost every lesson. Children sit, with blank zoned-out faces, staring at brightly coloured shapes and figures zooming around the screen……”As children engage in more screen activity, they definitely read less – and the effect is likely to be permanent…..Ultimately, screen images render the printed word simply boring, at a crucial phase when the child’sbrain and mind are developing. SNIP

Read the post here.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Big news from UK - and how you can help (from anywhere)

Big news from UK - and how you can help (from anywhere)


I wanted to quickly share this with you, from my friend across the pond, Mike Mitcham of StopSmartMeters! (UK).

It’s been a bad start to the year for the spin doctors at Smart Energy GB, with smart meters getting some well-deserved negative press (scroll down for the backstory).

Now, the UK Science and Technology Committee has launched a smart meter ‘evidence check’, and is asking for input from experts and public, until Friday.

So let's respectfully but firmly tell the UK gov't why they need to halt the smart meter programme once and for all. The deadline for comment is January 29 (this Friday). 

Please take this 2-minute action, from any country: Here's the link

Onward,
Josh del Sol

* * *

The backstory in the UK - January news:
Warning over a ‘ghastly mess’ in £11bn plan for smart meters – The Times
"The Department of Energy and Climate Change has devised by far the most complex rollout in the world"
"60 per cent of households with the meters were not using them only a year after installation."

Not So Smart – The government should listen to criticism of its latest IT plan before it is too late – The Times 
"It is sensible to worry now."

Could smart meters be used to spy on your home? Devices could be used to create ‘honeypot’ of data to sell onto marketing companies, privacy campaigners warn - Mail Online 
"Marketing firms are hoping to turn the information [smart meters] provide in to a steady stream of cash."

See more from our friends at www.StopSmartMeters.org.uk.

 
Copyright © 2016 Take Back Your Power, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as a subscriber of and/or crowd-funding contributor toward Take Back Your Power (http://takebackyourpower.net). Thank you for your support!!

Our mailing address is:
Take Back Your Power
#339 - 14241 NE Woodinville Duvall Road
Woodinville, WA 98072