Sunday, December 29, 2013

The top 25 under-reported (censored) stories of 2013 - Project Censored

The top 25 under-reported (censored) stories of 2013 - Project Censored

The top 25 under-reported (censored) stories of 2013 - Project Censored | Networking - p2p - a new society | Scoop.it
Project Censored specializes in covering the top stories which were subjected to media censorship either by being ignored or downplayed by the mainstream media each year.

The 5 top stories chosen this year include Bradley Manning and his courageous act of whistleblowing, tax havens where the 1% hide away their money, the secret negotiations for a trans-pacific partnership not subject to democratic controls, the fact that Obama has come after whistleblowers with heavy handed action, and the rise of groups in the US that preach hate and intolerance.

Other interesting stories: Interest on money inflates global prices by 35%, lots of hungry people in America (a fifth of Americans go hungry), the looming health threat of wireless technologies, journalists are under attack ... can't protect their sources any more, the ten-year anniversary of the Creative Commons providing an alternative to copyright, the dangers of fracking, Monsanto's trail of suicided farmers in India, and a proposed transaction tax that could curb speculation while bringing huge tax income...

See the stories and summaries by following the headline...
Sepp Hasslberger's insight:
Project censored is an academic project that is holding a mirror up to the face of journalism and the media. Every year, 25 stories are chosen that did not get the media attention they deserved…

Kapiti Coast school removes Wifi from class

Kapiti Coast school removes Wifi from class

By: Nita Blake-Persen, | Latest Education News | Saturday December 28 2013 18:00

A Kapiti Coast school is to have Wifi removed from around half of its classrooms, following concerns it may be damaging to children's health.
Te Horo School's Board of Trustees has decided to replace Wifi with hard-wired internet in classrooms for its year one to four students, after consulting with parents on the issue earlier this month.
The matter was sparked after one family called for more discussion on it, following concerns that a Wifi-capable iPod their son was using at home may have contributed to his fatal brain tumour.
The school's said to have received a large number of emails from around the world in support of pulling Wifi, after it began consulting on Wifi use.
Wifi will remain in classrooms for students in years five to eight, but the school will review how it's used early next year.
Photo: stock.xchng

His Refuge from the Digital Din

His Refuge from the Digital Din



Julie Keefe for The New York Times
Brian Faherty, who owns Schoolhouse Electric and Supply, in his Fire and Water room at the company’s building in Portland, Ore. The room is a digital device-free zone.

A version of this article appears in print on December 26, 2013, on page D2 of the New York edition with the headline: His Refuge From the Digital Din.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/26/garden/his-refuge-from-the-digital-din.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0

Police Brutality & Corruption in New Zealand

Police Brutality & Corruption in New Zealand

70+ USS Ronald Reagan Crew Members, Half Suffering From Cancer, to Sue TEPCO For Fukushima Radiation Poisoning

70+ USS Ronald Reagan Crew Members, Half Suffering From Cancer, to Sue TEPCO For Fukushima Radiation Poisoning

 | December 27, 2013 2:28 pm | Comments
After U.S. Navy sailors on the USS Ronald Reagan responded to the 2011 Fukushima disaster in Japan for four days, many returned to the U.S. with thyroid cancer, Leukemia, brain tumors and more.

At least 71 sailors—many in their 20s—reported radiation sickness and will file a lawsuit against Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), which operates the Fukushima Daiichi energy plant.

The men and women accuse TEPCO of downplaying the danger of nuclear radiation on the site. The water contaminated the ship’s supply, which led to crew members drinking, washing their bodies and brushing their teeth with contaminated water. Paul Garner, an attorney representing 51 sailors, said at least half of the 70-plus sailors have some form of cancer.

“We’re seeing leukemia, testicular cancer and unremitting gynecological bleeding requiring transfusions and other intervention,” Garner told New York Post.


Senior Chief Michael Sebourn, a radiation-decontamination officer assigned to test the aircraft carrier, said that radiation levels measured 300 times higher than what was considered safe at one point. Meanwhile sailors like Lindsay Cooper have contrasted their initial and subsequent feelings upon seeing and tasting metallic “radioactive snow” caused by freezing Pacific air that mixed with radioactive debris.

“We joked about it: ‘Hey, it’s radioactive snow!” Cooper said. “My thyroid is so out of whack that I can lose 60 to 70 pounds in one month and then gain it back the next. My menstrual cycle lasts for six months at a time, and I cannot get pregnant.
“It’s ruined me.”

Cooper said the Reagan has a multimillion-dollar radiation-detection system, but the crew couldn’t get it activated quickly enough.

“And then we couldn’t go anywhere,” she said. “Japan didn’t want us in port, Korea didn’t want us, Guam turned us away. We floated in the water for two and a half months.”

San Diego Judge Janis L. Sammartino dismissed the initial suit in late November, but Garner and a group of attorneys plan to refile on Jan. 6, according to Fox 5 San Diego.

Though publications like The Washington Times have wondered if the Navy and/or National Security Agency might have known about the conditions the sailors were heading into two years ago, Garner and the attorneys say the lawsuit is solely directed at TEPCO.

“We’re suing this foreign corporation because they are doing business in America,” co-counsel Charles Bonner. “Their second largest office outside of Tokyo is in Washington, D.C.

“This foreign corporation caused harm to American rescuers, and they did it in ways that give rise to jurisdiction here in this country.”

Hear more comments from Bonner, Cooper and Garner in the above video by eon3EMFblog.net .

Visit EcoWatch’s NUCLEAR page for more related news on this topic.

Switzerland: Electrosmog Exposure: Are We Preparing the Way for the Next Disease of Civilization?

29 December 2013

Switzerland: Electrosmog Exposure: Are We Preparing the Way for the Next Disease of Civilization?



Memorial to the insatiable hunger for data:
a mobile phone antenna

Swimming in a sea of rays
 by Jürg Steiner, Berner Zeitung, 22 December 2013 (translated from German by Google and the Editor of this blog)



We are sending ever faster and bigger data packets through our mobile and wireless network. We are doing so through electromagnetic radiation. Are we preparing the way for the next disease of civilization?

 
Casting WLAN networks like fishing nets, the Spitalgasse in Bern would be impassable. From the street, via a smartphone, one can locate dozens of pulsating wireless screens within a confined area. There are no benefits but everyone is irradiated, also by the mobile antenna covering the city center at full strength.

In the train, the same picture: from left and right, pulsating electromagnetic waves from private phones and laptops, while travelling through the sea of rays of the mobile phone network.


Omnipresent radiation

 
And that's just the beginning. By the end of 2014, the CFF [Swiss Railway] wants to guarantee the best internet connections and optimal cell phone reception in all its cars on long-distance traffic. In train stations, free Wi-Fi is the standard. The city of Bern is driving the development of a nationwide free Wi-Fi network. Postal buses move along the periphery like rolling Wi-Fi islands.

Hospital beds without WLAN coverage will be perceived as an imposition. In residential areas, routers from each apartment building overlap into a WLAN jungle. The Swiss mobile providers are upgrading their networks with more efficient LTE technology so that one can rapidly upload photos to Facebook, download PDFs smoothly, and stream YouTube movies.

Everything, everywhere, always. One can no longer escape the radiation coverage of wireless and cellular networks. Most of the news and information appearing on the concentrated display of one’s smartphone is being transmited using electromagnetic waves, whether via WLAN or mobile.

And that is why we are producing increasing electromagnetic pollution. Invisible. Impalpable. But very close to our bodies.



Conflict comes to a head 


Are we therefore at serious risk of illness? Or are fear mongers, skeptics of progress, and health fetishists merely plowing their next stomping ground?

Jürg Baumann moves almost daily in this area of conflict, where economic interests collide with health concerns with more and more violence. He is head of the non-ionizing radiation section of the Federal Office for the Environment (BAFU-FOEN). Together with Andreas Siegenthaler, an expert on issues in the high frequency range, he now wants to draw a different picture of the electromagnetic problem in the boardroom of the BAFU administration building in Ittigen. And first visits the fundamentals of radiation physics.



Altered brain waves

 
In contrast to X-rays, the waves from the non-ionizing radiation of cellular technology or Wi-Fi cannot directly change the atoms or molecules of living things. They do, however, generate heat such as is used in concentrated form in the operation of microwave ovens. One is now already leaving the scientifically physical knowledge about the consequences of WLAN and cellular radiation. It is undisputed that electromagnetic radiation has biological effects on the human body - for example, changing brain activity.

But we do not know how this comes about, and also whether it is physically significant. "These uncertainties," says Baumann, "have been included in the determination of radiation exposure limits for federal government regulations."

Roughly speaking, the radiation limits for mobile telephony, radio or radar systems are firmly set to protect the population not only from the unhealthy heating effect of the radiation, but also with a precautionary safety margin for any other biological effects.

In comparison with Europe, Switzerland has, according to Baumann, strict limits – which is becoming increasingly a thorn in the side of the mobile industry, pushing their networks to capacity limits.



"Extremely dynamic»

 
Regarding health, Baumann sees no cause for concern at the moment. On average, the exposure of the population is low, and also, the highest exposures would be “reliably limited, thanks to the strict Swiss regulations."

But he does not want to commit long-term, given the duration of exposure over the last few years at home, on the train, on the platform, in the office, in cafés. “Mobile communications are developing extremely dynamically," he says - "not only quantitatively and technologically."

That is very exciting, but the impact of new technical solutions on radiation exposure is hardly predictable. Also, how bio-medical knowledge is changing - for example, when more experiences become available of people moving in dense electromagnetic pollution over a period years.



Diffuse hypersensitivity

 
Sleep disturbances, fatigue, nervousness, headaches, tinnitus, dizziness - diffuse health complaints and more often associated with non-ionizing radiation.

Critical doctors believe that the human body would be broken, like a bioelectrical system, sensitive to the continuous electromagnetic load. Weak radiation, really safe wireless networks, for example, are pulsing with the same vibrations as alpha brain waves.

Hypersensitivity has established itself as a collective term for vague symptoms of possible radiation sensitivity, but it is not as yet an objective medical diagnosis with generally accepted, physically verifiable criteria. 

Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is often reduced to psychological problems, but there are research groups in the U.S. who have demonstrated neurological changes in electrohypersentive people. "The picture is too inconsistent for one to draw clear conclusions," says Jürg Baumann. Because of the big knowledge gaps, it is sometimes a bitter struggle for the truth amongst stakeholders. On the one hand, for economic reasons, network operators want to satisfy the growing hunger of users for data at any time, anywhere.

On the other hand, there are advocacy groups which are against the permanent expansion of mobile communications networks, such as "Gigahertz" which includes Bernese activist Hans-Ulrich Jacob, who 15 years ago, fought the shortwave transmitter at Schwarzburg.



Home-generated electrosmog

 
Among the critical spokespersons is the California group, Bioinitiative, which in 2012 presented its report on major global scientific knowledge for electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

Their conclusion: electrosmog weakens the immune system, reduces fertility, can cause abnormalities in cells, and promotes diseases such as cancer or Alzheimer's. Even very small doses of chronic radiation exposure are sufficient to cause adverse health effects.

We must keep in mind one thing, says Jürg Baumann. That we are often exposing ourselves to the most electrosmog. Radiation exposure not only increases in public spaces, but is also very strong at home, where at the family table, several smartphones are often transmitting at the same time and in the basement, a wireless base station is flashing.

If one finds oneself in the basement, "One of the most efficient ways to avoid electromagnetic radiation is to keep one’s distance from the radiation sources," says Baumann. Even one meter’s distance reduces the burden significantly.

Data on how much the average population is being exposed today to non-ionizing radiation and exactly how much it is increasing, is not being collected systematically. Based on a postulate by the Thurgau green party National Councillor Yvonne Gilli, the FOEN is now preparing a monitoring program. Financing has yet to be decided by the Bundesrat [Federal Council].



Live experiment

 
Whether the persistance of electrosmog raises electrohypersensitivity to a disease of civilization, is open. The widespread feeling of taking part in a self-inflicted live experiment on long-term radiation exposure, can be difficult to shake off.

It is clear that the possible permanent accessibility of mobile and wireless technology could promote the diseases of civilization that we know of: stress, exhaustion, burn-out. And mobile phone use while driving is, in contrast to radiation, an unequivocally proven risk for serious accidents.

(Berner Zeitung)

Original article in German 



How Your Cell Phone Hurts Your Relationships

How Your Cell Phone Hurts Your Relationships

The mere presence of a phone affects how you relate to others
Most of us are no stranger to this scenario:  A group of friends sits down to a meal together, laughing, swapping stories, and catching up on the news – but not necessarily with the people in front of them!  Nowadays, it’s not unusual to have one’s phone handy on the table, easily within reach for looking up movie times, checking e-mails, showing off photos, or taking a call or two.  It’s a rare person who doesn’t give in to a quick glance at the phone every now and then.  Today’s multifunctional phones have become an indispensable lifeline to the rest of the world. 
We might expect that the widespread availability of mobile phones boosts interpersonal connections, by allowing people to stay in touch constantly.  But a recent set of studies by Andrew K. Przybylski and Netta Weinstein of the University of Essex showed that our phones can hurt our close relationships. Amazingly, they found that simply having a phone nearby, without even checking it, can be detrimental to our attempts at interpersonal connection.
Przybylski and Weinstein asked pairs of strangers to discuss a moderately intimate topic (an interesting event that had occurred to them within the last month) for 10 minutes.  The strangers left their own belongings in a waiting area and proceeded to a private booth.  Within the booth, they found two chairs facing each other and, a few feet away, out of their direct line of vision, there was a desk that held a book and one other item.  Unbeknownst to the pair, the key difference in their interactions would be the second item on the desk.  Some pairs engaged in their discussion with a nondescript cell phone nearby, whereas other pairs conversed while a pocket notebook lay nearby.  After they finished the discussion, each of the strangers completed questionnaires about the relationship quality (connectedness) and feelings of closeness they had experienced.  The pairs who chatted in the presence of the cell phone reported lower relationship quality and less closeness.
Przybylski and Weinstein followed up with a new experiment to see, in which contexts, the presence of a cell phone matters the most.  This time, each pair of strangers was assigned a casual topic (their thoughts and feelings about plastic trees) or a meaningful topic (the most important events of the past year) to discuss — again, either with a cell phone or a notebook nearby.  After their 10-minute discussion, the strangers answered questions about relationship quality, their feelings of trust, and the empathy they had felt from their discussion partners.
The presence of the cell phone had no effect on relationship quality, trust, and empathy, but only if the pair discussed the casual topic.  In contrast, there were significant differences if the topic was meaningful. The pairs who conversed with a cell phone in the vicinity reported that their relationship quality was worse.  The pairs also reported feeling less trust and thought that their partners showed less empathy if there was a cell phone present.
Thus, interacting in a neutral environment, without a cell phone nearby, seems to help foster closeness, connectedness, interpersonal trust, and perceptions of empathy — the building-blocks of relationships. Past studies have suggested that because of the many social, instrumental, and entertainment options phones afford us, they often divert our attention from our current environment, whether we are speeding down a highway or sitting through a meeting.  The new research suggests that cell phones may serve as a reminder of the wider network to which we could connect, inhibiting our ability to connect with the people right next to us.  Cell phone usage may even reduce our social consciousness.
Perhaps it would be going too far to prepare for important conversations by throwing your cell phone into the closet, or leaving it in the car on first dates. But if you are spending the day with people you really care about, you might want to reconsider the next time you reach for your phone to reply to a text message or check sports scores.  Just having that phone nearby is bad enough.
Are you a scientist who specializes in neuroscience, cognitive science, or psychology? And have you read a recent peer-reviewed paper that you would like to write about? Please send suggestions to Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook, a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist at the Boston Globe. He can be reached at garethideas AT gmail.com or Twitter @garethideas.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Helen Lee Lin earned a Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Houston and currently works as a research scientist and freelance writer/editor in Ankara, Turkey.  Her research interests center around human relationships, language and communication, marketing, and media effects.  You can read her contributions to ScienceOfRelationships.com here or follow her on Twitter @helenleelin .