Monday, August 05, 2013

Facing the Screen Dilemma: Young Children, Technology and Early Education


Facing the Screen Dilemma: Young Children, Technology and Early Education


Did you know: that on any given day, 64% of babies between 1 and 2 watch TV and videos for an average of slightly over 2 hours; that in 2011 there were 3 million downloads just of Fisher Price apps for infants and toddlers; that estimates of how much time preschoolers spend on average with screen media range from at least 2.2 hours to as much as 4.6 hours per day?

Download the guide.

Research tells us that developing children thrive when they are talked to, read to, played with and given time for creative play, physically active play, and interactions with other children and adults. And there’s no research showing the benefits of introducing children to new technologies in the first years of life. Yet educators face increasing pressure to increase the amount of time children spend with digital technologies in early childhood settings, taking valuable time and resources away from activities proven to benefit learning and development. That’s why CCFC is proud to announce the publication of Facing the Screen Dilemma: Young children, technology and early education. Created  with our friends at the Alliance for Childhood and Teachers Resisting Unhealthy Children’s Entertainment (TRUCE), and packed with relevant research and practical tips, Facing the Screen Dilemma is the first guide designed to help early educators make informed decisions about whether, why, how, and when to use screen technologies with young children.  
Facing the Screen Dilemma evolved naturally from CCFC’s ongoing advocacy to reduce children’s screen time. In 2011, when the National Association for the Education of Young Children—the nation’s premier professional organization for early childhood educators—began revising its position statement on Technology in Early Childhood Programs, we urged NAEYC to join the public health community in recommending strong limits on the time young children spend with screens. Our efforts led NAEYC to strengthen a disappointing first draft, but we heard repeatedly from early childhood educators that the final version was still lacking. They were looking for information and guidance in working with parents around screen time at home, for sorting through the marketing hype, and for making evidenced-based decisions about using—or not using—screen technologies with young children.  
We created Facing the Screen Dilemma to meet those needs. It provides a much-needed overview of the research on young children and screen time. It also offers practical considerations and concrete advice for caregivers using screen technologies in their settings, and for those resisting pressure to abandon screen-free policies.  
Facing the Screen Dilemma arrives at a time of heightened concerns about the amount of time children spend with screen media. Excessive screen time is linked to problems like childhood obesity, sleep disturbance, and poor school performance, yet children of all ages are spending more time than ever in front of screens. Two new surveys from the Pew Internet and American Life Project and Common Sense Media highlight widespread concern among teachers that children’s constant use of digital technology hampers attention span and their ability to complete difficult tasks. 
While Facing the Screen Dilemma was written for early childhood professionals, parents will find the research sections and practical suggestions helpful in making decisions at home. If you have children in daycare or preschool settings, we urge you to share the guide with providers and teachers. And if you’re interested in sharing ideas and continuing the discussion, please join us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/screendilemma.
http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/screendilemma

Group of Consumers Energy customers wants out of smart meter program, files claim with Michigan Court of Appeals


Group of Consumers Energy customers wants out of smart meter program, files claim with Michigan Court of Appeals

Tarryl Jackson | tjackso1@mlive.comBy Tarryl Jackson | tjackso1@mlive.com 
Follow on Twitter 
on August 01, 2013 at 5:00 PM

828consumersbuilding.jpg
CITIZEN PATRIOT FILE PHOTO

JACKSON, MI – A group ofConsumers Energycustomers hopes to get rid of the utility’s opt-out fees for people who do not want smart meters installed on their homes.

The group of West Michigan residents, led by Michelle Rison, believes smart meters bring health risks and say the harm of smart meter emissions have been studied by scientists and medical professionals.

On July 25, the group filed a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals on a state order that will allow Consumers Energy to charge an opt-out fee for those who choose not to have smart meters installed on their homes.

Consumers Energy can charge customers who do not want to participate in the smart meter program with a one-time fee of about $69, according to an order issued June 28 by the Michigan Public Service Commission. For those who want an existing smart meter to be removed for a more traditional meter, Consumers Energy can charge them a one-time fee of about $124.

For all of those in the opt-out program using traditional meters that need monthly reading by Consumers Energy employees, the additional charge will be $9.72 a month, according to the MPSC order.

The additional opt-out charges are justified in covering the additional cost of the company to provide the special equipment and service, according to the MPSC ruling.
A representative from the MPSC was not immediately available for comment Thursday afternoon.

In the press release, the appellants say the World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer classified radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on an increased risk of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.

The group also cited privacy issues and interference with medical implants and believe the smart meters will not save money and are not environmentally friendly.

Consumers Energy officials dispute those claims of health and privacy risks, saying smart meters are safe, secure and give an array of benefits to customers.

More than 40 million smart meters already have been installed in the United States, with public service commissions in many states supporting their use as safe and effective upgrades to older technology, said Dennis McKee, communications director for Consumers Energy’s Smart Energy Program.

He said the smart meters reflect the changing needs and lifestyles of customers who want more information and taking more control of their energy use.

Only about 1.05 percent of Consumers Energy customers in the areas receiving smart meters have expressed interest in keeping their older meters, McKee said.

“Smart meters are safe, secure products that help to enhance customer service and control energy costs,” he said in an email. “Unfortunately, the group cites erroneous information and research to leap to conclusions.”

The Michigan Public Service Commission issued a report in July 2012 that said this technology has little health risk and outdoes the current meter system.

The appellants want to preserve customers’ rights to keep and/or restore their analog meters and have the fees eliminated. They feel the opt-out fees are unfair and create a hardship for those on fixed incomes.

“Should the appeal succeed, the MPSC will be ordered to reopen the case to hear the dangers of smart meter evidence, which they have up to now refused,” according to a statement from the group. “As awareness grows and this topic is better understood, people begin to connect the dots to threats to their individual freedoms and their deteriorating health.”

Rison, the lead appellant in the case, was not immediately available for comment Thursday afternoon.

The smart-meter technology is a $750 million investment for Consumers Energy, which says smart meters will allow residents to see exactly how much energy they are using on a real-time basis and adjust usage to cut monthly bills.

So far, more than 100,000 installations have been completed in Muskegon, Oceana, Ottawa and Allegan counties on the west side of state, and the utility’s 1.8 million electric meters in residential homes and small businesses are expected to have smart meter technology by 2019.

http://www.mlive.com/business/index.ssf/2013/08/group_of_consumers_energy_cust.html

Was this computer nerd killed after discovering how to murder anyone with a pacemaker?


Was this computer nerd killed after discovering how to murder anyone with a pacemaker?


| 

When the acclaimed television drama  series Homeland climaxed with a devious plot by terrorists to kill America’s vice-president by hacking into his electronic pacemaker, critics scoffed at the ludicrousness of the idea.

But the outrageous storyline was thought credible by many in the world of computer security.

Among those was the New Zealand-born computer hacker Barnaby Jack.

The 35-year-old — who, unlike many in the business, used his skills ‘ethically’ — had spent his career demonstrating the dangers posed by unscrupulous hackers combined with computer manufacturers’ failure to install proper safety devices on equipment.

Scroll down for video

Mr Jack spent his career demonstrating the dangers posed by unscrupulous hackers combined with computer manufacturers¿ failure to install proper safety devices on equipment
Mr Jack spent his career demonstrating the dangers posed by unscrupulous hackers combined with computer manufacturers¿ failure to install proper safety devices on equipment

Jack thought it highly plausible that a terrorist could hack into someone’s pacemaker and speed up their heartbeat until it killed them.

He also believed it was possible to infect the pacemaker companies’ servers with a bug that would spread through their systems like a virus.

    ‘We are potentially looking at a “worm” with the ability to commit mass murder,’ he said. ‘It’s kind of scary.’ Jack certainly knew what he was talking about — having become famous after demonstrating how he could sabotage cash machines and make them dispense large sums of money (a trick he called ‘Jackpotting’) by hacking into a bank’s computer system. 

    Watch full SecurityWeek video here


    Another stunt was to reveal how a diabetic’s insulin pump — which is designed to deliver insulin to the body day and night — could be hacked from 300ft away, so it could dispense a fatal dose. 

    Jack, who had been obsessed with computers since childhood, emigrated to the U.S. at the age of 21 and joined a firm specialising in computer security issues.

    In recent years, he had developed a specific interest in what is known as ‘embedded’ technology, the hardware and software built into everyday objects such as cars, banking systems, home appliances and medical devices.
    Jack thought it plausible that someone could hack into a pacemaker and speed up their heartbeat until it killed them
    Jack thought it plausible that someone could hack into a pacemaker and speed up their heartbeat until it killed them
    He was preparing to demonstrate his work two days ago at a major computer-hacking convention in Las Vegas. 

    In an address to the Black Hat convention titled ‘Implantable medical devices: hacking humans’, Jack was due to show an audience of hackers and cyber security experts at Caesar’s Palace how he could hack into devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators.

    He planned to show how, using a wireless transmitter, he could trigger a deadly power surge and kill someone from up to 50ft away. 

    A pacemaker is a small battery-powered device implanted in the chest, which regulates the beating of the heart by sending regular electrical pulses to the heart muscles. Modern versions are controlled from small  external computers.
    Famous pacemaker wearers include Sir Elton John, Sir David Attenborough, former U.S. 
    vice-president Dick Cheney and former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt.

    More than 500,000 have been fitted to patients in Britain, but it was in the U.S. — where nearly five million people use pacemakers and defibrillators — that Jack’s stunt was regarded as a potentially seismic revelation.

    However, he was never to give the demonstration. A week beforehand, Jack was found dead in his flat in the San Francisco neighbourhood of Nob Hill. His body was believed to have been found by his girlfriend, Layne Cross, a 31-year-old model. According to friends, he was found dead in bed.

    To say his sudden death  remains shrouded in mystery is putting it mildly. 

    Predictably, for someone who worked in such a shadowy world, there have been countless theories about how he was killed. Hackers are a suspicious bunch who have become even more paranoid since the U.S government’s efforts to silence whistleblowers such as ex-soldier Bradley Manning (who faces jail for leaking secret government cables to WikiLeaks).

    The absence of even the most basic details about Barnaby Jack’s untimely death has ignited a firestorm of speculation that foul play could be involved.

    The absence of even the most basic details about Barnaby Jack¿s untimely death has ignited a firestorm of speculation that foul play could be involved
    The absence of even the most basic details about Barnaby Jack's untimely death has ignited a firestorm of speculation that foul play could be involved

    This has been fuelled by the refusal of the coroner’s office to discuss the case other than to say that the autopsy results may not be available for ‘weeks, possibly months’.

    Indeed, a source at the local police station admitted that this silence was puzzling. 
    Jack’s former work colleagues at IOActive, which has headquarters in Seattle and London, said they knew of no medical condition that could have killed him. 

    Officially, San Francisco police will say only they have passed the case to the local coroner’s office — an indication, said a spokesman, that it had found no evidence of ‘foul play’.

    But on Twitter and the news-sharing site Reddit, commenters suspect the involvement of the U.S. government and the CIA.

    Some have suggested that government officials wanted to silence Jack before he could reveal how America’s enemies could hack into devices such as pacemakers.

    Perhaps, a poster on Reddit suggested, the American authorities wanted to harness the skills themselves and use them  on their enemies and ‘didn’t want the competition’.
    There have been other, even more outlandish, suggestions — such as that Jack is not actually dead but has been spirited away by the U.S. government to work on secret research projects.

    Others have linked the tragedy with the recent death of Michael Hastings, a young American journalist whose revelations about U.S. general Stanley McChrystal’s contempt for White House officials forced his resignation as Nato chief in Afghanistan. 

    Talented: Award-winning journalist Michael Hastings died in a car crash this week in Los Angeles
    The death has been linked to that of Michael Hastings, a young American journalist who died in a car crash 

    Hastings complained about the U.S. being a ‘surveillance state’ and his death in a car crash in Los Angeles in June was widely reported as suspicious.

    Then there is yet another theory about Jack’s death. Could the multi-million-dollar healthcare industry have silenced him?

    After all, he was about to expose a huge flaw in one of its most lucrative devices that could cost it untold millions, and cause a major public embarrassment. 

    It’s certainly true industries have not always appreciated hackers such as Jack publicly exposing their security weaknesses. 

    Dan Kaminsky, a security researcher and close friend, says Jack had recently had ‘uncomfortable meetings’ with cash machine manufacturers and makers of electronic medical devices. ‘I’m sure he made enemies,’ he adds. 

    Dan Kaminsky, a security researcher and close friend, says Jack had recently had 'uncomfortable meetings' and was sure he had enemies
    Dan Kaminsky, a security researcher and close friend, says Jack had recently had 'uncomfortable meetings' and was sure he had enemies
    But he explained that while Jack was a ‘pain in the butt’ for the companies whose products he hacked, he at least tried to keep them informed of what he was doing.

    There is universal concern in such businesses about the vulnerability to sabotage of devices that work wirelessly, via the internet.

    And David Marcus, an expert at the security technology company McAfee, says Jack was at the cutting edge of such research. Manufacturers of items such as cash machines and insulin pumps have been forced to alter their designs following Jack’s revelations about how easily they can be sabotaged.

    They are also deeply worried that the exploits of Barnaby Jack and other hackers will encourage less scrupulous people to try it for themselves. It’s certainly true that the speech he was due to give was greatly anticipated.

    Previous similar demonstrations attracted huge audiences. One in Melbourne, Australia, last year, saw Jack deliver an 830-jolt to a pacemaker by logging into it remotely. At the time, he warned of the possible consequences, saying ‘the most obvious scenario would be a targeted attack against a high-profile individual’.
    Countless medical devices now use wireless technology and Jack pointed out that their security authorisation — such as username and password — was designed to be circumvented easily, for it is often necessary for them to be cracked by any doctor needing to access them in an emergency. 
    One security consultant at the Black Hat convention on computer-hacking said: ‘Jack made a lot of waves, so you can understand why people are suspicious when he suddenly drops dead a few days before this convention.’
    ‘Sometimes you have to demonstrate the darker side,’ Barnaby Jack liked to say, as he sought to justify his skills at computer-hacking. How ironic if he became the victim of that ‘darker side’.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2383908/Was-nerd-killed-discovering-murder-pacemaker.html#ixzz2b8fqmxXm
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Couple join the smart meter class-action suit


    Couple join the smart meter class-action suit



    Smartmeters.jpg
    A Campbell River couple has joined a lawsuit against BC Hydro after the utility threatened to cut off their power if they did not consent to having a smart meter installed on their home.

    Ron and Nan Latchford have joined a class action lawsuit brought forward by Salt Spring Island resident Nomi Davis who said her analog meter was replaced last year by a smart meter in a deceptive fashion.
    According to a video Davis posted on Youtube, she was promised by a representative from Corix, which has been installing the new meters, that her meter would have the radio switched off.

    But immediately after the meter was installed, a friend was able to measure electromagnetic frequencies coming from the smart meter every five seconds – some from 40 feet away.

    The Latchfords signed onto Davis’ lawsuit on April 30, but the papers were just filed to B.C. Supreme Court on July 25.

    The suit demands that BC Hydro remove unwanted smart meters, that BC Hydro stop installing the devices without the consent of the home owner, that BC Hydro be prohibited from declining to sell power to properties who don’t want the meters, and that the power corporation be restrained from accepting payments in exchange for not having a smart meter.

    Nan Latchford said the lawsuit is about rights and freedom.

    “We feel our civil rights are being ignored by not giving us a choice and not giving us the freedom to have our homes free of an intrusion of a radiating device that BC Hydro wants to put on our homes and keep track of every little step we take by recording our power usage in a manner that you can detect whether we’re home, whether we’re not at home, whether we’re on vacation and if we are at home, what we do at home,” Latchford said.



    Ted Olynyk, spokesperson for BC Hydro, told Strathcona Regional District directors last year that many of the concerns people have about smart meters are based on false information.

    “The Internet is a great place for information, but not all of it is correct information,” he said. “There’s misinformation out there that BC Hydro will know who you have over for dinner, when you’re eating dinner…because of smart meters.”

    Olynyk also tried to lay to rest fears over emissions, noting the radiation levels from smart meters are so low that public places with Wi-fi pose potentially greater health risk than having a smart meter.

    But Latchford, who has a steel cable around her analog meter and a sign asking Corix to please not install a smart meter, doesn’t buy it.

    Latchford claims she knows someone with a health condition who has been advised by her doctor to stay away from wireless devices such as smart meters because they could prompt a stroke.

    Latchford said after she and her husband told Hydro last summer that they wanted to opt out of smart meters, the utility wrote her an e-mail, dated September 2012, which warned them that, “any obstruction or interference with the installation of the smart meter…could subject you to penalty and to the disconnection of your electrical service.”

    The Latchfords then sent a final refusal notice to BC Hydro early this year that they would not accept a smart meter. So far, they have not heard back.

    Since then, Energy Minister Bill Bennett has announced an opt-out program which includes having the meter, but with the radio turned off or keeping the analog meter, but with an extra monthly charge for meter readings.

    Latchford said Bennett’s opt out is “a farce” and there’s no way to know if the radio is actually turned off, as what happened to Davis on Salt Spring Island.

    BC Hydro reports that 96 per cent of its customers have already switched over to smart meters and 1.8 million are in use across the province.

    The utility maintains that the smart meters will allow the corporation to get the lights back on faster in the event of a power outage because the meters will alert BC Hydro immediately of an outage.

    Hydro said the devices will also allow customers to save money on their hydro bills because the meters allow customers to see their daily energy use and make adjustments as necessary.

    http://www.campbellrivermirror.com/news/218002931.html

    OFGEM Complaint: British Gas Misleading Customers On Smart Meters

    OFGEM Complaint: British Gas Misleading Customers On Smart Meters 

    Home → Taking Action → OFGEM Complaint: British Gas Misleading Customers On Smart Meters - 

    [SSM UK]  Subscriber Chris Jones lodged a formal complaint with UK energy regulator OFGEM this morning about British Gas’s current Smart Meter tactics, and kindly forwarded a copy of his letter to us so we could publish it here.
    Chris comprehensively pulls apart the British Gas Smart Meter Charter which can be downloaded here.
    If you are minded to making OFGEM aware of any concerns you have about British Gas’s sales tactics, feel free to take a copy of Chris’s note and forward it to OFGEM yourself  (consumeraffairs@ofgem.gov.uk).  You might even like to copy it to your local MP and newspaper too.
    British Gas is targeting its huge customer base with Smart Meters, and we thank Chris for his efforts.  [/]
    COMPLAINT TO OFGEM RE: BRITISH GAS SMART METER TACTICS
    From: Chris Jones
    Sent: 03 August 2013 08:03
    To: consumeraffairs@ofgem.gov.uk
    Subject: ASA, OFT and Smart Meters
    Good Morning,
    I would like to complain about the high pressure tactics being used by British Gas to support its Smart Meter programme. You will gather that there are so many unanswered or deferred questions about Smart Meters (especially involving bad information about obligation, lack of information about variable tariffs and consumer protection, potential health issues) that I am concerned that the programme might be being mis-sold to consumers.
    The following complaint against British Gas was declined by the Advertising Standards Authority on the grounds that it does not regulate Customer Charters. The Office of Fair Trading refers consumers to OFGEM.
    1. The British Gas (BG) Charter (attached) gives the impression that Smart Meters are compulsory although a customer could delay installation on request:
    Compulsion: “…All houses in the UK need to have them by 2019 and we’ve already started to install them”
    Deferral: “…If you don’t want to have a smart meter installed yet, just tell us”
    In fact Smart Meters are NOT Compulsory.
    “Just yet” also suggests inevitability – it will have to be fitted one day, when in fact customers do have a choice to PREVENT installation. Furthermore, approved meters can be used indefinitely provided they remain accurate – so again British Gas’ suggestions are in question.
    2. Furthermore, I understand that in a customer letter from British Gas Customer Relations Team representative, Kate Sadler, the customer was told:
    “Every single one of our [British Gas] customers is going to have a Smart Meter installed.  This isn’t a customer choice, as we’re replacing all our meters with Smart Meters… We’re installing these meters across our whole customer base as they’re a benefit to our customers… It’s a government initiative… Unfortunately I’m unable to stop this from happening just for you, as as I’ve mentioned above all our customers will be having these installed.”
    This contradicts ‘Smart meters, a guide: Dept of Energy & Climate Change’ Jan 22 2013 which stated:
    “…Energy companies will be required to install smart meters and take all reasonable steps to reach everyone. However we do not expect energy companies to take legal action to fit a smart meter if they cannot get the householders co-operation”.
    Smart Meters are NOT Compulsory and elsewhere British Gas admit:
    “… you do not have to have a smart meter if you do not want one; we will remove your details from our rollout programme.”
    3. BG say:
    “…Once you’ve got a smart meter you can still change supplier; your rights haven’t changed”
    In fact the Government has suggested that you rights will change:
    Hansard WS19, 13 May 2013 Baroness Verma said this:
    “We have decided that from the end of this year, when a customer switches from a supplier who has provided them with a compliant smart meter, the new supplier cannot replace that smart meter with a dumb meter and must either rent the previous supplier’s meter or install their own new smart meter.”
    So your rights will change, because after the end of this year, the Government intends that you cannot get rid of a Smart Meter and go back to a dumb meter.
    4. BG say:
    “…When your smart meters are in place, you can stay on your existing tariff or choose a new one that suits you better.”
    BG omit to mention the prospect of new variable tariffs which will VARY the unit price. Reported operating experience abroad is that 80% of consumers see their bills go up with Smart Meters, so how does BG claim that its new tariffs will suit consumers better ? What are BG’s intentions for pricing the existing tariffs ?
    5. BG say:
    “…We promise to take care of your personal and energy data. Your information will be kept secure to protect it
    from misuse.”
    How does BG justify suggesting that data will be “secure” when there are so many concerns that Smart Meter broadcasts are vulnerable to data hacking which might allow burglars to detect whether a property is occupied ? Are BG guaranteeing security ?
    6. BG do not mention the wireless technology used by Smart Meters. No mention at all. This is interesting. There ARE increasing health concerns about the wireless technology. UK standards are less onerous than other countries which have decided to use wired Smart Meters instead.
    7. BG do not say how much their Smart Meter programme is costing consumers along with how much consumers are expected to save. DECC expect a typical consumer to save 3%. More frugal consumers are unlikely to save money once the costs of Smart Metering programme are accounted for.
    8. BG over-simplify the supposed benefits of Smart Meters. As well as noticing energy patterns, once variable tariffs are applied that change the unit price at any time of day, Smart Meters require intensive monitoring by the consumer. However, BG only suggest that monitoring is about consumption. BG do not mention price:
    “…If you can see the energy you use, you can start to make changes that help you save money.”
    9. BG do not mention what to do if a consumer never wants a Smart Meter fitted. BG do not mention that a consumer will not (after the end of this year) be able to have Smart Meter removed. Correspondingly, BG do not say how a consumer can have a Smart Meter removed before the end of this year.
    10. BG say:
    “…Once you’ve got a smart meter you can still change supplier; your rights haven’t changed”
    BG do not admit that Smart Meters allow the Energy Supplier to remotely cut off supplies for revenue protection and as admitted by the Minister, in future for Grid Management purposes. Accordingly, the consumers rights will change with a Smart Meter because they may be forced to accept interruptable tariffs or find themselves having to pay more to have an uninterruptable tariff.
    11. BG say:
    “…We won’t sell your energy consumption data to any third parties.”
    As I understand it, all Energy Supplier consumption data will be centrally held. It may not be sold, but BG do not mention that consumers’ data will be held in central data collection – or any future prospect of use of that consumer data being liberalized, or used as a basis for taxation (such as carbon taxation). Again, BG cannot justify the statement because BG does not control the centrally-collected data.
    Regards
    Chris Jones
    - See more at: http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/ofgem-complaint-british-gas-misleading-customers-on-smart-meters/#sthash.MO13h56n.dpuf

    Public Discussion on Wi-Fi Safety


    Public Discussion on Wi-Fi Safety

    This non-commercial website is offered by an electronics engineer in response to genuine community concerns regarding the potential health liabilities arising from broadcast internet services. The general population is still on a learning curve with regard to the nature and extent of electromagnetic radiation in our home and working environments. Yet a certain level of understanding is necessary to fomulate opinion, and counteract any exploitation by those who would profit by jeopardising our mental and physical wellbeing. This is particularly timely given the multi-pronged push by the government, media, and industry to cultivate a lucrative technology-needy public.

    Generic depiction of a public access Wi-Fi network with town-wide coverage provided by five transmitting antennae..

    When plans for erection of a mobile phone tower are announced, there is typically a negative response by broad segments of the community. However, wireless internet routers and cordless digital phones are also relatively strong emitters of bio-active pulsed microwaves. These are now subject worldwide to health warnings and outright bans, particulary in settings where children or pregnant women may be exposed.


    One type of wi-fi antenna used in public hotspots.

    If the above devices are in one's own home, the user is deemed to be exercising "free choice". This is obviously not the case for installations in schools or public spaces. The situation is analogous to passive smoking, except that everyone receives the same dose, A more considered approach by those seeking to deploy these technologies is therefore not unreasonable.

    The material on this website is presented primarily "as is" from a diverse range of online sources. Some are provided for general information, and do not specifically relate to the project under discussion. To avoid compounding the issue, references specific to mobile phone towers and handsets are not included, even though the technology is closely allied.

    This opportunity has also been used to provide a separate page on "smart" electricity meters, which is accessible only via the righthand menu. Their roll-out across NSW has so far been delayed due to strongly contested trials in other States. However, it is a foregone conclusion that they will arrive eventually, adding further to the burden of mirowaves upon our environment.

    Byron News Article

    Before proceeding, the reader may benefit from viewing the following two artlcles, which appeared in the Byron Bay News, publically announcing the Mullumbimby Wi-Fi project proposal.

    Mullumbimby: the New Silicon Valley?

    Wi-Fi Project Gathers Pace

    Additionally, here are two letters responding to same, published by the same paper during subsequent weeks.

    Wi-Fi Project - #1

    I REFER to the recent Byron News article entitled "Wi-Fi Project Gathers Pace". There is no doubt we have become accustomed to the convenience of mobile and wireless technologies. Studies even show the electro-magnetic radiation they emit is psychologically addictive. The industry stance has been that there is "no conclusive evidience" pointing to addverse health effects. Yet the weight of independent scientific evidience is shifting to the contrary. It could be asbestos and smoking all over again.
    Thise who promote ever-increasing levels of exposure capitalise on the fact that EMR is intangible to the senses, unlike many other contaminants. However, it is just as real, as are the related biological disorders, some of which take decades to manifest. As public awareness grows, citizens will rightfully begin to question practices such as deployment of wi-fi microwaves throughout a public school ... or an entire shopping district. In both instances, for the occupants, there is no meaningful consent of method of avoidance. The legislated "safe" limit in Australia for ambient EMR is hundreds of times less than in many other countries. Don't we owe it to ourselves and our families to get the full story before passively accepting into our midst yet another source of electro-pollution.

    Wi-Fi Project - #2

    I am in agreement with Peter Nielsen's letter last week in regards to the Wi-Fi project in Mullumbimby. I am concerned about the lack of consultation with the community about something that we don't have full information about yet. it also concerns me that being in a central shopping area we will have no choice as to be exposed to this electro-magnetic radiaition. We have a choice if we install it in our homes (which we have chosen not to) but to do our shopping and socialising in such an area concerns me. What about our children and their developing brains?
    We have moved from Sydney where there seems to be an obsession with checking phones every couple of minutes and holding it in your hand constantly as though your life depends on it. With relief, I haven't seen people doing this here; instead living in awareness of what's happening right now rather than what message your phone is delivering you. Will we see everyone on computers now instead of being present with a person? I hope this doesn't go ahead.

    Community Action

    Byron Shire residents have a strong history of involvement in decisions affecting quality of life. For this to remain effective, we need to keep abreast of rapidly emerging issues surrounding information technology. For example, due to budget cuts, the National Broadband Network (NBN) will now service many communities via radiation-producing wireless links instead of the originally designed fibre optic cable.


    Free wi-fi, some wif-fi, or "wi-fi free". You decide.

    Nothing on this website is intended to suggest, directly or indirectly, that those behind the Mullum Wi-Fi project are acting with impropriety or outside of the law. According to standards set by ARPANSA, there is probably nothing to stop commercial Wi-Fi antennae being erected on every rooftop in town.
    Community members, and local officials, seeking an informed opinion on the tangible effects of EMR exposure are urged to view the resource material linked at the bottom of each page. It represents the "tip if the iceberg"; a very small sample of the full extent and implications of this issue that will emerge if you keep looking. Then make your views known to our elected representatives, participating businesses, and at any forthcoming public meetings devoted to this topic..
    Anyone wishing to consult with the author informally on these matters, or assist with distributing information on the ever-increasing levels of ambient electro-pollution, is invited to email. Local Council members can be contacted directly via the addresses provided below.
    Thank you for your visit. I hope it will be informative and rewarding.


    http://www.mullumwifi.com