by Erin Elizabeth, Health Nut News:
John C. Dvorak from the No Agenda Show podcast wrote for PC Magazine for THIRTY YEARS. However, while he wrote extensively for the magazine, in August of this year he wrote a less than “PC” (pun intended!) article about the dangers of 5G (read it here [and see the text below]) entitled, “The Problem With 5G”. Unhappy with what he wrote, the magazine fired him, removed his original content, then replaced it with some industry supported drivel (read that here). (Yikes, they really didn’t like what he had to say!)
And before you think that perhaps Dvorak’s work just wasn’t up to snuff, you can still find all his old columns- alive and active, here. It seems they just needed to silence his opinion.
So, if you are curious about what 5G is and why’s it’s surrounded in controversy, check out the video below. (And maybe try to live as far away from it as possible.)
The Problem With 5G
By John C. Dvorak
The technology might be the problem, but even worse for the companies behind it is the perception that 5G is already unsafe before they even get it on a single pole.
I'm not saying this because the technology does not work. It's a bad bet because so little is known about the effects of millimeter waves (30GHz-300GHz). While these frequencies only permeate a small fraction of the human epidermis (the skin), the effect on the cornea, in particular, needs serious research.
5G is already getting some bad publicity, which could result in everything from bans on the technology to equipment destruction by vigilantes.
Of course, when you read deeper into what the chip and telecom companies are trying to do, you quickly discover that many systems calling themselves 5G are currently 4G mods using 5G as a marketing tool. Let's ignore that scam and stay focused on millimeter waves.
As usual, the mostly arrogant (or naïve) technology industry is caught flat-footed at the negative reaction. It always figures that the stupid public will buy into anything new and jazzy if it makes their handheld phone seem a little faster, and even pay more for the privilege of the upgrade.
One of the ways the industry has made this all work in the past is by quick implementation followed by a "Hey look it works! Nobody was killed" approach. That cannot happen with true 5G, which needs all these mini-towers all over the place. That leaves plenty more time for the public to get a clue and be freaked out.
When you do a search for "5G is Safe" on Google and Bing, you get a number of negative stories and a laundry list of why some people believe it's unsafe.
Companies may as well begin to market a 5G mobile phone with a skull and crossbones on it.
If this bad PR is somehow reversed and 5G takes over the market, I will be shocked. The way it is going does not bode well for any of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment