AVAAZ PETITION : HOW THIS CAMPAIGN CAN BE HARMFUL FOR EMF ISSUE ?
Dear Agnes and everybody else,
AVAAZ PETITION : HOW THIS CAMPAIGN CAN BE HARMFUL FOR EMF ISSUE ?
After spending 18 month enquiring for the documentary MICROWAVES SCIENCE AND LIES, here is my point of wiew about the AVAAZ community petition.
I am sorry to say that this AVAAZ community petition is a nonsense for me. We must remember that AVAAZ in the last years opened "the community petitions" and allowed anyone to launch a campaign. Who trigged this petition? Who is Liz B. who who created the campaign and hide her name? After AVAAZ build a worldwide recognition as a major ONG, these community campaign are "AVAAZ trademark" but how valuable are they?
It is very naive and unrealistic to think that IARC will reconsider the classification. A classification is a huge work who consist in scanning all the science at a time and to produce a statement based on scientific datas. The facts that allowed to produce the 2B classification came from the plastic industry workers, (who had statisticlly more cancers than other workers) and epidemiological studies. Taking action for an unrealistic campaign allows to make diversion. And then, the civil society do not face the real issue.
As we showed in the film MICROWAVES SCIENCE AND LIES, the real issue about EMF is that there are many evidences that the WHO is infiltrated, on the EMF issue, by people that serve the interests of the industry.
Thanks to the AVAAZ community petition, people will focus on IARC as the "bad guy". For me IARC is one of the best branch of the WHO organization. This 2B classification is one of the best thing that happened in the last 30 years about the issue, even if it is not entirely satisfying . After the classification, WHO published the fact sheet 193, that dismiss the IARC classification! IARC asked WHO to change the fact sheet 193. WHO never answer. In the movie MICROWAVES SCIENCE AND LIES, Emily VAN DEVENTER (in charge of the EMF project at WHO) do not want to answer the question : "Who wrote the fact sheet 193?"
This AVAAZ community petition show a complete misunderstanding of the situation. IARC did its job considering science in 2011 classification. This AVAAZ campaign will cast doubt about the 2B IARC classification in the public opinion. IARC 2B classification was one of the worst problem that the industry had since a long time. The AVAAZ community campaign will probably participate to decrease the problem.
To support my arguments I send you above two links to watch the film which I refer. Alasdair Philips from "Powerwatch News" in the U.K. wrote a few days ago about MICROWAVES SCIENCE AND LIES : "It is by far the best investigative over-view of the non-ionising and health debate from the 1940s to the present day."
Best regards
Jean HECHES
Filmmaker
For those who want to watch the film, here is a link for a free screening. Please keep this link private.
The code for screening is : waves
link : https://vimeo.com/89144337
For those who want to support the film, here another video on demand link ( 5$ )
Le 26 nov. 2014 à 01:40, Agnes Ingvarsdóttir <agnes@mast-victims.org> a écrit :
Hi All.
Liz Barris, of the Peoples Initiative has started a Avaaz petition to try to Force the IARC/WHO to change
the EMR 2b classification to Class 1 Cancer causing!
Please sign, and please ask your followers to sign as well.
Liz is aiming for 750 (worldwide) please let us give them REAL numbers.
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_ Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?sdbXHfb
Best regards.
Agnes Ingvarsdottir. www.mast-victims.org
No comments:
Post a Comment