Friday, June 27, 2014

Experience: my dog found my cancer

Experience: my dog found my cancer


'None of the oncologists I met was sceptical about Mia's role in diagnosing my cancer – they have heard it before'
experience: Emilie Clark with dog Mia
Emilie Clark with Mia: 'She fixed her eyes on mine and stared intently. She seemed certain there was a problem.' Photograph: Mark Chilvers for the Guardian
I met my miniature dachshund, Mia, at a rescue centre five years ago. She was one of a litter of 12-week-old puppies confiscated from a puppy farm. I hoped she would be my assistance dog for my health problems. Since birth, I have suffered with a type of heart arrhythmia called ventricular tachycardia. My heart races and, if I don't take medication immediately to slow it, I lose consciousness. I've had to be rushed to hospital to have it restarted. Unrelated to that, at 19 I started to lose my hearing and now struggle with high-pitched sounds such as the phone or doorbell ringing.
I was studying to be a vet, so the idea of having an assistance dog appealed to me – I love animals. The theory was that Mia would alert me when the phone was ringing or when my heart rate was speeding up and I had to take emergency medication. When she was 16 weeks old, she was assessed by a charity that trains pets to become assistance dogs. I hoped the immediate and instinctive bond Mia and I shared when we met meant she'd be suitable.
She qualified as my assistance dog just before her second birthday. Mia learned to alert me just before my arrhythmia starts by making a horrible screeching noise and jumping up at me. She ferrets in my handbag and brings me my heart medicine. She puts her paw on my leg to inform me when the phone's ringing. Once we were in B&Q when the fire alarm sounded and, executing her training perfectly, she lay on the floor and stared at me, hard, to tell me a siren was blaring.
One evening in November 2011, I was at my computer when Mia leapt on to my lap and nuzzled into the flesh at the top of my left breast. She closed her eyes and licked furiously. That frightened me because it's what she does when I have a bruise or cut.
I pushed her gently away but she fixed her eyes on mine and stared at me intently, as she does when she's alerting me to something. I was uneasy now. Mia seemed certain there was a problem with the area at the top of my breast. I couldn't distinguish anything – my breasts are naturally lumpy – so it was difficult. All evening Mia attempted to leap on to my lap and tend to the area of skin where she perceived a problem. The following morning, I visited my GP with a sense of dread. I asked for an ultrasound or a mammogram. I didn't start the consultation by telling him that my dog had alerted me to the possible abnormality – I was aware it might sound far-fetched, but when he was dismissive, saying it was unlikely I had breast cancer because I was only 24, I explained.
"I know dogs detect cancer and my dog is determined there's something wrong with my breast," I said firmly. Then I informed him that, as I trusted my dog, I wasn't leaving his surgery until he'd made me a hospital appointment.
My faith in Mia's diagnostic abilities wasn't misplaced. I had an ultrasound within a week and, sure enough, there was a lump that a biopsy later confirmed was grade 2a breast cancer. Two days later, I was in surgery having the lump removed. Then I started radiotherapy – five days a week for three weeks. I was angry. I was only 24 and I'd already suffered so many health problems.
It made everything else harder. Training to be a vet requires 100% dedication and, with fighting cancer and having intense and exhausting radiotherapy, I couldn't give that, so I had to drop out of university. They were really hard times. My relationship broke up and I had to move back home with my parents. Mia was by my side through it all. Cuddling her after bad news or a gruelling session of treatment alleviated some of the pain.
None of the oncologists I met during my ordeal was sceptical about Mia's role in diagnosing my cancer – they had heard it before. There's a charity called Medical Detection Dogs that trains dogs to sniff out cancer, and its work is endorsed by Cancer Research UK. Scientists are researching how dogs possess this diagnostic ability so that humans can harness it.
Fortunately, my cancer hadn't spread but it will be another 16 months of scans before doctors grant me the all clear. Meanwhile, I'm rebuilding my life. No matter what life serves up, the bond between Mia and me will always be incredibly strong.
• As told to Jane Common
Do you have an experience to share? Emailexperience@theguardian.com

Selenium Reduces Mobile Phone (900 MHz)-Induced Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Function, and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells.

 2014 Jun 27. [Epub ahead of print]

Selenium Reduces Mobile Phone (900 MHz)-Induced Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Function, and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells.

Abstract

Exposure to mobile phone-induced electromagnetic radiation (EMR) may affect biological systems by increasing free oxygen radicals, apoptosis, and mitochondrial depolarization levels although selenium may modulate the values in cancer. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of 900 MHz radiation on the antioxidant redox system, apoptosis, and mitochondrial depolarization levels in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line. Cultures of the cancer cells were divided into four main groups as controls, selenium, EMR, and EMR + selenium. In EMR groups, the cells were exposed to 900 MHz EMR for 1 h (SAR value of the EMR was 0.36 ± 0.02 W/kg). In selenium groups, the cells were also incubated with sodium selenite for 1 h before EMR exposure. Then, the following values were analyzed: (a) cell viability, (b) intracellular ROS production, (c) mitochondrial membrane depolarization, (d) cell apoptosis, and (e) caspase-3 and caspase-9 values. Selenium suppressed EMR-induced oxidative cell damage and cell viability (MTT) through a reduction of oxidative stress and restoring mitochondrial membrane potential. 
Additionally, selenium indicated anti-apoptotic effects, as demonstrated by plate reader analyses of apoptosis levels and caspase-3 and caspase-9 values. In conclusion, 900 MHz EMR appears to induce apoptosis effects through oxidative stress and mitochondrial depolarization although incubation of selenium seems to counteract the effects on apoptosis and oxidative stress.

PMID: 
24965080

[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


Thursday, June 26, 2014

$80 water meter fee slammed

$80 water meter fee slammed

City council has approved it, but an $80 fee to read the water meter is excessive, says Councillor James Pasternak.


Jessica Annis, who doesn't want the city to install a smart water meter in her home, holds up a no trespassing sign.  She wants to continue to report the numbers for her meter readings herself.
DAVID COOPER / TORONTO STAR Order this photo
Jessica Annis, who doesn't want the city to install a smart water meter in her home, holds up a no trespassing sign. She wants to continue to report the numbers for her meter readings herself.
The City of Toronto will soon start charging $80 to manually read water meters of customers who refuse new wireless meters. Based on three readings a year, that’s an extra $240.
At least 3,341 customers who don’t want the smart meters that automatically transmit readings are being warned by the city they could also be fined up to $50,000 and have their water cut off.
While objectors want to continue sending in their readings, Toronto Water notes the new program as approved by city council is mandatory for all customers.
The city should try to accommodate people rather than slap them with a “draconian” $80 non-compliance fee, said Councillor James Pasternak.
“This is really a far reach for big government to be coming down so hard on homeowners,” he said.
The city’s water department expects to save $5 million annually by getting rid of manual meter readings.
More on the star.com
Longtime Toronto resident Shelly Lee said the potential savings could come at a price. “We know that these wireless systems are hackable,” she said.
Critics of wireless water meters in the U.S. have pointed out that transmissions aren’t encrypted, so readings can easily be altered or the signals can even be jammed. There’s also the possibility of customers abusing the system by finding ways to manipulate the wireless meters.
“My current meter works just fine,” Lee said. “I will not let Neptune (the installer) into my home to replace it.”
Toronto Water says out of 242,000 accounts in areas where the program has been completed, holders of 2,368 metered accounts either outright refused access or ignored as many as nine contacts from the city, including a registered letter. They will be subject to the $80 fee every time their meter is read.
In the same completed areas, another 973 customers with no meters who pay a flat rate have refused to move to the new meters and they will be subject to an annual fee of $1,020 for water.
Residents, including Lee, have cited concerns about radio frequencies from the wireless devices, prompting Toronto Public Health to issue a statement that the transmissions — which last for one second a day — are unlikely to pose a health hazard.
But Lee said exposure to additional radio frequencies in a world that’s being inundated by various cellular, radio and other wireless transmissions is just another possible health risk.
She doesn’t understand why residents couldn’t have the option of sending in water readings online or over the phone.
Midtown resident Darlene Allan said she’s been calling in her reading for 20 years and doesn’t understand why the city won’t let her continue.
“It seems like the city is taking something that isn’t broke and trying to fix it,” Allan said, adding she didn’t appreciate the city “threatening” people with potential huge fines and cutting off their water supply.
East-end resident Jessica Annis doesn’t want to hand over access to her property so the city can install a device that could compromise her privacy if the system were hacked.
“They say this isn’t hackable, well everything’s hackable,” Annis said. “I have privacy concerns. I have other concerns. They don’t have authority over my private property.”
In many cases, the reasons for people not co-operating are unknown because the customer simply hasn’t responded to any of the contacts, said Anthony Fabrizi of revenue services.
The new fee, previously approved by council, takes effect July 1. At budget committee recently, Pasternak tried but failed to have the fee delayed to Dec. 31.
Pasternak objects to the fee and the “threatening” warning letter that says allowing access is mandatory under city bylaws and notes that failure to comply is an offence carrying a maximum $50,000 fine, and could result in the water supply being turned off.
“I think in general electronic meter reading is a solid policy but it’s very important when you bring in new measures that you do so with a soft landing,” he said. “I think it’s important to show leniency.”
In a report, the city said the meter reading fee could serve as an incentive for people to accept automated meters, and added that $80 is the city’s actual cost of sending someone out to do a manual read.
Toronto Water general manager Lou Di Gironimo said the program has been successful in that all but 1.3 per cent of customers in completed areas have balked.
“That’s a pretty good success rate,” Di Gironimo said. “The people that have completely ignored us or just said no, council decided we should be able to charge non-compliance fees because there will be extra costs to manage those accounts.”
Unlike Pasternak, Councillor Gord Perks supports the fee.
“The principle should be to recover our costs,” Perks said. “If someone wants a service other people don’t get, they should pay the cost of that special service. Otherwise, they’re asking everyone else to subsidize them.”
In approving wireless meters, city council was told they would help detect leaks by more closely tracking consumption. It noted customers are notified to check for leaks if their daily consumption is three times the average.
The program also targets flat rate customers who have no meter and tend to use more water than the flat rate covers. The $1,020 annual fee covers the city’s estimate of actual water consumption.
Pasternak said he didn’t have a problem with the new flat rate charge because customers should pay for the water they use.

Radiation defense breakthrough announced by Health Ranger; affiliate sign-ups now open, product launch imminent


Radiation defense breakthrough announced by Health Ranger; affiliate sign-ups now open, product launch imminent



Thursday, June 26, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger


(NaturalNews) If you've read Natural News for very long, you already know we don't joke around about making history with industry-shaking breakthroughs and discoveries. (See some of our scientific findings published at Labs.NaturalNews.com for examples.) Today I'm announcing one of the most innovative breakthroughs in the history of nutritional supplements, and we are opening our affiliate program to a limited number of affiliates who want to share the good news about these supplements while earning a generous commission for helping protect lives.

After many months of intense research in the atomic spectroscopy laboratory, working with cesium isotopes that include Cesium-137, we are now announcing the world's first dietary supplement that captures cesium isotopes, supporting natural elimination of cesium-137, cesium-135 and cesium-134 from the gastrointestinal tract.*

This emergency-use supplement, called "Cesium Eliminator, Formula 137" is:

* Confirmed 95.44% effective at capturing cesium isotopes during in vitro laboratory testing, across a broad range of concentrations from 0 - 91 ppm. (See charts.)

* Double laboratory verified via ICP-MS atomic spectroscopy instrumentation at two independently-operated laboratories.

* Patent pending with full documentation on file with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

* Based entirely on G.R.A.S. ingredients already recognized by the FDA as safe.

* Manufactured in the USA at a GMP-compliant facility regulated by the FDA.

* Available in both powder and capsule formats.

See full details of Cesium Eliminator, including its laboratory-verified binding efficacy, FAQs, ingredients and more at: www.CesiumEliminator.com


Affiliate program payouts and requirements
The Natural News affiliate program pays:

* 17% on sales on Cesium Eliminator

* 12% on sales on most other Health Ranger-branded products from the Natural News Store, including Clean Chlorella, Health Ranger Select Hawaiian Spirulina, astaxanthin and more (excludes large #10 canned items, which have almost no profit margin).

* Affiliate cookies are set at 90 days

To qualify for the affiliate program, you must have a website, blog, email list, social media following, radio show or other media reach ability already in place, and you must agree to our marketing terms which include sticking to accurate, scientifically-validated marketing messages that tell the truth (among other terms, see the affiliate signup for details).


(Please have patience with our affiliate approval process, which may require 1 - 2 weeks to complete, given the very high number of people we anticipate signing up as affiliates.)

The world's first cesium-capturing dietary supplement
Cesium Eliminator, Formula 137, is the world's first dietary supplement that's scientifically proven to bind with and capture cesium isotopes.*

Why cesium? Because Cesium-137 is the single most destructive radioisotope that threatens life following:

- A nuclear accident
- An act of nuclear terrorism
- An act of nuclear war

In all three scenarios, cesium-137 is the most devastating, long-term radioactive contaminant that threatens water supplies, food supplies and human populations. Cesium-137 has a 30-year half-life and persists in soils for 200 - 300 years, rendering those soils unusable for agriculture.

About Cesium-137, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control says:

Exposure to Cs-137 can increase the risk for cancer because of exposure to high-energy gamma radiation. Internal exposure to Cs-137, through ingestion or inhalation, allows the radioactive material to be distributed in the soft tissues, especially muscle tissue, exposing these tissues to the beta particles and gamma radiation and increasing cancer risk. (1)

And here's what the EPA says about Cesium-137:

Cesium-137 that is dispersed in the environment, like that from atmospheric testing, is impossible to avoid... People may ingest cesium-137 with food and water, or may inhale it as dust. Like all radionuclides, exposure to radiation from cesium-137 results in increased risk of cancer. (2)

Cesium-137 is deadly, and that's why this breakthrough product, Cesium Eliminator Formula 137, can be such a lifesaver in emergency situations.


The perfect preparedness companion with potassium iodide or nascent iodine
Many people have stockpiled iodine sources for strategic protection against radioisotopes of iodine such as Iodine-131. Nascent iodine protects the thyroid from radioactive iodine isotopes.

While nascent iodine (or potassium iodide) is a wise choice for preparedness against radiological disasters, it's only a half-measure because it offers zero protection from radioactive cesium-137 fallout.

Cesium-137 fallout quickly contaminates open water sources such as rivers, streams and lakes. When those sources are used as public water supplies, the home tap becomes irradiated with cesium-137. Drinking radioactive water can be fatal.

Cesium Eliminator offers the best binding with cesium isotopes, providing a layer of defense that iodine-based products simply can't address.* That's why the well prepared are going to want to add Cesium Eliminator to their preparedness gear, possibly right alongside nascent iodine. (The two products should not be consumed simultaneously, however, because iodine can reduce Cesium Eliminator effectiveness. See CesiumEliminator.com for full details.)

Anyone in the business of preparedness, survival, "prepping" or public safety will want to consider becoming an affiliate for this innovative, breakthrough product. It begins shipping next week.


Natural News donating Cesium Eliminator to emergency response organizations
Immediately following product launch, we are initiating a large-scale donation campaign to donate Cesium Eliminator to emergency response organizations across the United States. These include veterans groups, local Red Cross offices, sheriff's offices and local hospitals.

The official donation announcement will be launched in just a few days, providing a contact point where members of these organizations can request such donations.

My aim is to get this product into as many people's hands as possible, to help prepare them against nuclear accidents, nuclear war or nuclear terrorism.

You can help us in this mission -- and earn a healthy affiliate commission at the same time -- by joining our affiliate program and placing banners or text links on your own websites or blogs.

Help pioneer the launch of the world's first cesium-capturing dietary supplement
With the launch of Cesium Eliminator, we are making history together! You can join in that history by helping spread the word (and earning an affiliate commission in the process).

Believe me when I tell you that Cesium Eliminator will be impossible to get during the next nuclear accident or disaster. Those who want to be protected from radioactive cesium-137 in water or food will be highly motivated to stock up now while the supply is available.

This is a product that can literally help change the course of human history by giving victims of nuclear disasters a powerful, scientifically-validated tool to protect their safety and help defend their lives.* You can be part of this effort to help save lives and deploy a lab-validated dietary supplement that can literally help protect lives in an emergency.

Warnings and emergency medicine notes
Cesium Eliminator is NOT a replacement for urgent medical care. It is not a treatment for radiation poisoning. Anyone suffering from acute radiation poisoning should seek immediate, urgent hospital care. No dietary supplement blocks radiation (due to the laws of physics). Cesium Eliminator is for emergency use only and is NOT a vitamin or mineral supplement, nor a daily multivitamin. See www.CesiumEliminator.com for full FAQs, notes and warnings. Use only as directed.

* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

Sources for this article include:




THE WORK OF OLLE JOHANSSON

THE WORK OF OLLE JOHANSSON

Dr. Olle JohanssonIn the 1970s the newspaper industry was one of the first to supply its employees with computers. Complaints of visual problems and headaches, as well as clusters of miscarriages and birth defects in children born to female editors and other newspaper employees, generated some publicity. In the United States, then-Representative Al Gore held Congressional hearings in 1981 on the health effects of computer screens. In Sweden, a union activist brought the problem to the attention of Dr. Olle Johansson, a neuroscientist at the world-renowned Karolinska Institute. Johansson was the head of the Experimental Dermatology Unit at the Institute.
“For me,” said Johansson, “it was immediately clear that persons claiming skin reactions after having been exposed to computer screens very well could be reacting in a highly specific way and with a completely correct avoidance reaction, especially if the provocative agent was radiation and/or chemical emissions — just as you would do if you had been exposed to e.g. sun rays, X-rays, radioactivity or chemical odours.”
Johansson began to study the skin of these patients, and proved that they had a real skin condition that was provoked by sitting in front of a computer screen. The damage was similar to that caused by ultraviolet radiation from the sun. He also showed that the radiation from computers causes measurable changes even in the skin of “normal” people,” and also in the skin of laboratory animals.
He named the new disease “screen dermatitis.” However, since such individuals also usually complained of other symptoms, such as chest pain, memory loss, fatigue, insomnia, dizziness, nausea, and headache, the more general term “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” came into use.
Many people who worked in the electronics industry in Sweden, including an estimated 12% of the electrical engineers in that industry, became electrically sensitive, and helped form an organization called Föreningen för el-och bildskärmsskadade (Association for the Electrosensitive), or FEB. Due in part to the work of FEB and the research of Dr. Johansson, electrosensitivity is a fully recognized disability in Sweden.
Dr. Olle JohanssonMore recently, Johansson and his colleagues have conducted important epidemiological studies showing that wireless communication networks are causing significant illness throughout society. They have also shown that increased rates of asthma as well as certain types of cancer were strongly correlated with exposure to radio broadcasting during the twentieth century.
“The world may be moving inexorably,” Johansson warns, “toward one of those tragic moments that will lead historians to ask: Why did they not act in time?”

ARTICLES BY OLLE JOHANSSON

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Las señales de telefonía móvil son “peligrosas” (The mobile phone signals are "dangerous" )

Las señales de telefonía móvil son “peligrosas”

Las señales de telefonía móvil son “peligrosas”
Jefe de las telecomunicaciones belga elimina el Wi-Fi y dice que las señales de telefonía móvil son “peligrosas”
Una gran cantidad de la población continúa usando WiFi y otros dispositivos inalámbricos sin pensarlo dos veces, sin embargo un número creciente de personas está cada vez más preocupado por los problemas en la salud asociados al uso de estas tecnologías.
Didier Bellens resulto ser una de estas personas. Lo que hace al Sr. Bellens diferente es que también dirige Belgacom, la mayor compañía de telecomunicaciones en Bélgica.
Su preocupación es tal que no sólo ha elegido retirar el WiFi en el piso 27 de Belgacom donde se encuentra su oficina, también decidió prescindir del teléfono celular; sólo toma llamadas en el teléfono fijo de su oficina.
Si el WiFi y la radiación del teléfono celular son seguros, ¿por qué el jefe de Telecomm de Bélgica lo ha prohibido en sus oficinas?
¿El Sr. Belem sabe algo que nosotros no?
Se podría pensar que Belles, el presidente de Belgacom, podría haber elegido ser un poco menos expresivo sobre sus preocupaciones en torno al uso de los teléfonos celulares y los Wi-Fi. Sin embargo, él no tiene ningún reparo en educar a otros sobre estos temas, especialmente los de la generación más joven.
Cuando los jóvenes del Centro de la Facultad de Woluwe-Saint-Pierre le hicieron preguntas acerca de los peligros de los móviles él les dijo sin rodeos que es malo y peligroso para la salud. Como explica Bellens, ‘durante el día, es mejor utilizar un auricular porque el celular se calienta’. Y sigue diciendo. ‘Las ondas son peligrosas. Por la noche, es mejor apagarlas. Si usted usa su teléfono como despertador, también debe apagarla.’
Para poner esto en perspectiva, esto es el equivalente a que se prohibiera el OMG (organismo genéticamente modificado) de Monsanto en su propia cafetería (que por cierto lo han hecho) y luego recomendar que la gente coma tan poco OMG como sea posible (ojalá).
No se ven noticias como esta todos los días, al parecer, hay un jefe de una empresa de telecomunicaciones con un poco de sentido común y una conciencia.
¿Son reales estos peligros de radiación?
Las afirmaciones de Bellens pueden no ser tan descabelladas como puede parecer al escucharlas por primera vez. A principios de 2011, la Organización Mundial de la salud (OMS) clasificó la radiación emitidas por los dispositivos como los teléfonos celulares y los dispositivos WiFi como ‘posible cancerígeno humano’ (clase 2B).
En 2007, el grupo de trabajo Bio Initiative emitió su opinión sobre 30 años de estudios científicos que documentan los bio-efectos y los efectos adversos para la salud a estas exposiciones a campos electromagnéticos (EMF). Llegó a la conclusión de que “los límites de seguridad pública existentes son insuficientes”. El recientemente publicado informe Bio Initiative 2012 escrito por 29 científicos independientes de todo el mundo dice que la situación es mucho peor que lo que se pensaba en 2007.
Apagando el teléfono celular
Hay muchas preocupaciones que rodean el uso de los teléfonos celulares. Uno de los más preocupantes es la relación con los tumores cerebrales. Además de un sinfín de otras complicaciones en la salud, el profesor Joel Moskowitz de la Universidad de California, Berkeley encontró, a través de compilar la investigación de conclusiones de cada estudio realizado sobre el vínculo entre los tumores cerebrales y el uso del teléfono celular que, “La evidencia consistente de que el uso intensivo del teléfono celular durante una década o más aumenta el riesgo de tumores cerebrales por lo menos en un 30%.”
¿Y cuán peligrosa es la radiación de las microondas emitidas por WiFi?
Los niveles de radiación emitidos por WiFi son ciertamente bajos. Pero el problema es la naturaleza de estos campos electromagnéticos. Estos pulsos y frecuencias moduladas son en particular biológicamente perjudicial y la acumulación de todas estas fuentes y opciones son una preocupación real.
Las preocupaciones por el uso de WiFi se centran alrededor de los descubrimientos del Dr. Magda Havas, pH.d., profesor asociado del medio ambiente y recursos de estudios en la Universidad de Trento, ha hecho en los últimos años a través de su investigación y las visitas en sitios en donde el uso de WiFi es alta, por ejemplo, en las escuelas.
El Dr. Havas encontró que aquellos expuestos al WiFi experimentan:
• Dolores de cabeza
• Mareos
• Sentirse fuera de lugar
• Pulso rápido
• Arritmia de corazón
• Aglutinadas glóbulos, que entre otras cosas,
puede provocar náuseas, cansancio
y entumecimiento
La investigación muestra que la exposición al WiFi puede:
• Perpetuar el crecimiento del cáncer
• Causar daño permanente de ADN
• Comprometer el sistema inmune
• Afecta el esperma de los machos
Incluso hay evidencia limitada de autismo.
Si los jefes de las empresas de telecomunicaciones siguieran el camino de Bellens y dijeran la verdad sobre estas radiaciones que emiten estos bienes de consumo menos personas podrían estar utilizando estas tecnologías ya que tendrían pleno conocimiento del potencial riesgo para su salud. Pero lamentablemente no es así, primero está el dinero antes que la salud pública.

The mobile phone signals are "dangerous" 


By Editorial | June 25, 2014 

The mobile phone signals are "dangerous" 
Chief of the Belgian telecommunications eliminates Wi-Fi and says that mobile phone signals are "dangerous" 
A lot of people still using WiFi and other wireless devices without a second thought, but a growing number of people are increasingly concerned about the health problems associated with the use of these technologies. 
Didier Bellens turned out to be one of these people. What makes it different is Mr. Bellens also directs Belgacom, the largest telecommunications company in Belgium. 
His concern is that he has chosen not only remove the WiFi on the 27th floor of Belgacom where your office, also decided to dispense with the cell phone; just take landline calls in his office. 
If the WiFi and cell phone radiation are safe, why Telecomm chief of Belgium has forbidden in their offices? 
Did Mr. Belem knows something we do not? 
You might think that Belles, President of Belgacom, could have chosen to be a little less expressive about their concerns regarding the use of cell phones and Wi-Fi. However, he has no qualms about educating others about these issues, especially the younger generation. 
When young Center School of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre asked him questions about the dangers of mobile he told them bluntly that is bad and dangerous to health. As Bellens explains, 'during the day, it is best to use a headset because the cell is heated'. And continues. 'The waves are dangerous. At night, it is best to turn them off. If you use your phone as an alarm, you must also turn it off. '
To put this in perspective, this is equivalent to the GMO (genetically modified organism) Monsanto is banned in their own cafeteria (which incidentally have) and then recommend that people eat so little OMG as possible (hopefully ). 
There are news like this every day, it seems, there is a head of a telecommunications company with a little common sense and a conscience. 
Radiation hazards are these real? 
Bellens Claims may not be as outlandish as it may seem at first listen. In early 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiation emitted by devices like cell phones and WiFi devices as' possibly carcinogenic to humans "(Class 2B). 
In 2007, the Working Group Bio Initiative issued its opinion on 30 years of scientific studies documenting the bio-effects and adverse health effects from these exposures to electromagnetic fields (EMF). It concluded that "the existing public safety limits are inadequate." The recently published report written by Bio 2012 Initiative 29 independent scientists around the world said that the situation is much worse than what was thought in 2007. 
Turning off the cell phone 
There are many concerns surrounding the use of cell phones. One of the most worrying is the relationship with brain tumors. In addition to a host of other health complications, Professor Joel Moskowitz of the University of California, Berkeley found through compile research findings of each study on the link between brain tumors and cell phone use "the consistent that intensive cell phone use for a decade or more increases the risk of brain tumors by at least 30% evidence." 
And how dangerous is the microwave radiation emitted by WiFi? 
Radiation levels emitted by WiFi are certainly low. But the problem is the nature of these electromagnetic fields. These pulses are frequency modulated and biologically harmful and particularly the accumulation of all these sources and options are a real concern. 
Concerns about the use of WiFi focus around Dr. Magda Havas discoveries, Ph.D., associate professor of environmental and resource studies at Trent University, has made in recent years through its research and visits to places where WiFi usage is high, for example, in schools. 
Dr. Havas found that those exposed to WiFi experience: 
• Headaches 
• Dizziness 
• Feeling out of place 
• Rapid pulse 
• Heart Arrhythmia 
• agglutinated blood cells, which, inter alia, 
may cause nausea, fatigue 
and numbness 
Research shows that exposure to WiFi can: 
• To perpetuate cancer growth 
• Cause permanent damage DNA 
• Engage the immune system 
• Affects males sperm 
There is even limited evidence of autism. 
If the heads of telcos follow the path of Bellens and say the truth about these radiation-emitting consumer goods unless these people might be using these technologies as they would have full knowledge of the potential health risk. But unfortunately it does not, the money is first before public health.