Wednesday, June 25, 2014

500,000 Cell Phone Towers Causing Cancer Rates To Soar

500,000 Cell Phone Towers Causing Cancer Rates To Soar

cell phone tower
  
(Jonathan Landsman)  Since 1997, the United States has gone from around 50,000 cell towers to over 500,000 and counting. In my opinion, the ever-expanding deployment of wireless technology represents one of the greatest threats to human health – along with GMOs in our food supply and the geoengineering (chemtrail spraying) of the planet.
Of course, the wireless industry says ‘no worry.’ So, why are they making cell towers look like a church cross; cactus in the desert; barn silo or a tree in the park? What are they trying to hide?

When it comes to radiation exposure – is ignorance bliss?

The slogan of Stealth Concealment Solutions, Inc., a South Carolina company says it all: ”Our Success is Invisible”. They go on to say, “Imagine running a business whose success relies on being completely undetectable to the public. Ours does.” They obviously pride themselves on hiding wireless, radiation-emitting, devices from the public.
In 1992, a BP sign at a local gas station in Atlanta became the first stealth cell phone tower in the nation. Over the years designs have expanded and gotten much more ‘creative’.
The First Presbyterian Church in Des Moines is working with Verizon to construct a tower that will be dressed up as an 11-story cross. The deal, which is being reviewed by a city zoning board, includes annual compensation to the church.

Cell tower radiation threatens our DNA

Let’s face it, cell phone towers are scientifically experimental technology. To date, there have been no long-term studies done on the effects of cell tower radiation exposure on humans, animals or plant life.
However, we are beginning to get an idea of the damage done to humans. According to the Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center in California, studies show than even at low levels there is evidence of DNA damage.
On an epidemiology level, we see a link with cell towers to brain tumors, cancer, suppressed immunity, depression, miscarriage, Alzheimer’s disease plus many other chronic health problems.

Cancer rates soar living near cell towers

In May 2011, the World Health Organization classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields (inclusive of cell towers) possibly carcinogenic to humans based upon studies showing an increased risk of lethal brain cancer associated with wireless phone use. If you have any doubt – about the dangers of microwave radiation from cell towers – I strongly suggest you look into the work of Dr. Barrie Trower, a British physicist who was a microwave weapons expert and worked for the Royal Navy and the British Secret Service.
According to Dr. W. Lšscher of the Institute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy of the Veterinary School of Hanover in Germany, dairy cows that were kept in close proximity to cell phone towers for two years had a reduction in milk production along with increased health problems and behavioral abnormalities.
The most powerful cell towers are placed on mountains and hilltops outside urban areas. Studies of people and animals in the area show all kinds of stress reactions including sleep disorders, birth defects, cancer and Alzheimer’s.
Many European countries already set radiation exposure limits much lower than the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allows. The FCC only considers the ‘heating effect’ of wireless technology – yet many independent scientists warn that wireless (microwave) radiation has a ‘biological effect’ – at much lower levels than required to heat the body.

Can we afford this human experiment?

No one really knows what happens when populated areas are surrounded by cell towers for years and years. But, many cancer experts suggest that it takes 10 or more years to develop an ‘official’ cancer diagnosis and microwave radiation increases our risk of cancer.
Clearly, with wireless technology, we are being exposed to millions of times more radiation than any other generation before us. The question is: what price will we pay for modern technology?

Protect yourself from cell tower radation

Are you surrounded by cell towers? To discover how many towers are in your neighborhood – simply click the link below:
http://www.antennasearch.com/sitestart.asp?sourcepagename=&getpagename=hopgsitemain&cmdrequest=getpage
When you find out where the towers are it’s up to you to find out the EMF readings in your home. To get reliable readings you can call a qualified EMF consultant, who will come to your house or you can purchase an EMF meter.
Owning a meter is a good idea since EMFs change often – depending on where you travel. And, it’s not too expensive to purchase your own meter. I, personally use a Cornet ED78S RF/LF.

Minimize your exposure to wireless technology

Make sure your bed and couches are not near a wall where the readings are high. If you have land and own a home planting trees between your house and the cell tower will offer some protection. Trees help absorb radiation.
Use radiation-blocking paint or wall-covering or other shielding devices if the readings are high. Keep in mind, windows are usually the most vulnerable spots in your home. So, there is a special window film that comes in a roll from Scotchtint – which you can use to minimize your exposure to EMF pollution.
If you want to learn more about how to create a healthy home environment – visit: The International Institute of Building Biology and Ecology for more information.
And, to learn more about the health effects of EMF pollution – visit: BioIntiative 2012
Ultimately, to minimize the expansion of cell towers in your area, you will need to get socially/politically active to educate the public about the dangers – especially local politicians. Let them know that cell towers are not welcome in your area and be sure to watch the film, Take Back Your Power.

Monday, June 23, 2014

What a radiating world of gadgets!


What a radiating world of gadgets!


Saman Haziq / 23 June 2014
In a world punctuated by an ever-increasing number of gadgets, a study finds that electromagnetic field radiations coming from multiple gadgets and multiple directions overlap, and have serious long-term and short-term risks. 


Does your day start by the alarm you set on your mobile phone? Do you keep your cellphone under your pillow or just by your side for that ‘moral’ consolation? Are you one of those who likes to heat up your cup of milk or water in the microwave? And once you have your cuppa ready, is it laptop time for you?


Better late than never (Dos and Don’ts)
> Keep your phone away from yourself while sleeping. If you want to put an alarm on it then put it on airplane mode first.
> Don’t keep your phone in your pocket all the time. Keep it at a distance of at least 15mm from your body.
> Keep calls short and if at all you have a long call to make, then use a wired headset and not a Bluetooth set.
> Try using the landline more than a cellphone.
> Don’t give your phones to your kids to play as their skulls are thin and radiowaves travel through your child’s brain.
> When signals are low on your phone, avoid using it as the phone is radiating at a maximum level to get connectivity.
> When using the microwave, close its door and step away. And when you turn it off, pause a few seconds and then open its door.
According to Dr Vikas Inder Nath Nehru, specialist ENT and head and neck surgeon, there are several long term risks associated with radiation emanating from gadgets.

Electromagnetic Field (EMF) radiation is increasingly affecting our daily lives, said Dr Nehru, and narrated a case study of a 39-year-old “perfectly healthy” sound engineer, who visited him complaining of dizziness and a burning sensation around his ear for the past eight months. “He felt he was riding an ocean wave ... (He) experienced sleeplessness, headaches, ringing sensations, tiredness, muscle aches, delayed reaction time, lost focus, affected memory, distraction (and the) ground felt wobbly (to him).
“We put him through a regular test drill with neurological examination and some more tests and found (he was) ... suffering from a high frequency sensory hearing loss. He had tried lots of drugs ... vitamins ... but nothing worked. He said he spent around Dh30,000 on his illness with no relief,” Dr Nehru said.

Dr Nehru advised the patient to take a six-week leave from his job, stop using his cellphone during that period, turn off WiFi and to visit him for a check up after six months. It worked and the engineer returned saying he felt a “lot better”.

Dr Nehru said the incident prompted him to dig deeper into cellphone radiation and the dangers associated with it.

Energy a cordless phone emits
Quoting a study conducted by a famous German scientist, Dr Nehru said if a cordless phone is ringing two rooms away from you then the intensity of the energy emitted from its signals is equivalent to the energy of the sound a Boeing 707 produces! “It’s as if you are sleeping on your pillow and a Boeing 707 aircraft is right over you,” he said.

We are surrounded by EMF
Focusing his study on cellphones, iPads, iPods, microwave ovens, wireless routers, laptops, desktops, cordless phones, tablets etc, Dr Nehru said EMF radiations come from multiple gadgets from multiple directions and are overlapping.


Fact box
> Radiation exposure in your surroundings can be measured in concrete terms
> As a result of exposure, you acquire a positive charge (body voltage) in your body, which can also be measured.
> The above two will diagnose how much you are affected and several preventive measures tailored to your requirements can be suggested.
Some of the short-term effects of such radiations are headache, sleeplessness, confusion and the inability to concentrate. Long-term exposure can lead to brain and salivary gland tumours, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia and Parkinson’s disease. He said there is no “safe dose” of usage.

In 2004, there were 1.2 million cell phones and the number has now gone up to 4.3 billion. This means that almost 80 per cent of the world’s population is using cellphones.
The WiFi effect
Indian actor and social activist Juhi Chawla in a recent video posted on YouTube said the cellphone is a fantastic piece of technology but it must be used with care and restraint. Chawla has been the face of a campaign against the indiscriminate installation of mobile tower antennae and the harmful effects of EMF radiation.

Chawla explained that phones with WiFi radiate at a higher speed as they are constantly downloading data.

Cellphones and cordless phones keep emitting frequencies all the time whether they are being used or not. And the worst time is when one is sleeping as our bodies are stationary, and radiations around us are constantly affecting us.

Microwave radiation
Although, microwave radiation is non-ionising, it produces thermal effects. It breaks up atoms in food, heats them up and dries the water. Cellphone radiations do exactly the same. Its thermal effect can dry up our body liquid. Now, factor in the fact that an average human body is made up of 60-65 per cent water.

Dr Nehru said that microwave is less of a problem as energy is contained in a box and continues only for a short period. Whereas in a WiFi or cellphone, it is not contained; it is open, exposed and is pulsed, which means that the radio frequency is continuous and ongoing all the time. It is all the more harmful to use the cell phone in a car, train or an elevator as the metal sheet you are surrounded by acts like a microwave oven.

Cellphone is not a toy!
Some parents say schools have made it compulsory for kids to have or interact with mobile gadgets to revamp education.

Pakistani national Mahmood said his five kids are all hooked to the iPhone — even his one-year-old, who “loves touching the screen”.

“My kids are sometimes required to work on iPads and laptops at school. My eldest son Ali, 14, takes his iPad to school as he says he doesn’t have time to go to the computer lab and would rather research on his iPad in his classroom, which has excellent WiFi.

I feel it’s important for them because they are constantly gathering information and moving forward.”

Dr Nehru said children are a special-risk group as they absorb more energy compared to adults. Their skulls are thinner and the distance radio frequency has to travel is shorter. Their absorption power is more and the immune system is still developing.

All forms of wireless radiations can also affect the hippocampus, the area of the brain responsible for learning new tasks.

Four-year-old Aariz loves playing games on his iPad, while his sister Aiza, 7, is a pro at using it. Their parents, Talha and Irum Siddiqui, said they have limited the use of these gadgets as they recently heard from someone that kids’ fingerprints can get affected if they constantly touch their iPad or touch-screens of phones.

Juhi Chawla advised that it would be helpful if you could put your phone or iPad on the ‘airplane mode’ before giving it to your child.

Stance of world health authorities
Studies show that dangers of WiFi are much more than those of wired gadgets.

Several associations like the International Committee on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the World Health organisation (WHO) have been conducting studies on the issue and had initially said that there is no substantial proof that EMF radiation is hazardous to human health. ‘‘On May 31, 2011, WHO changed its stance and now says that wireless radiation is ‘Category B2 Carcinogenic’, which means that it  is “possible” that it can cause cancer. It now lists mobile phone use in the same ‘carcinogenic hazard’ category as engine exhaust, chloroform and lead.’’

The ICNIRP has said that six minutes per day is a safe limit for cell phone use.

Rise in autism cases
Dr Nehru pointed to the statistical increase in incidents of autism in the last few years; every five years, the incidents seemed to have doubled. The only thing that has happened in the last 15 or 20 years is the WiFi and cellular radiations, and there is clearly a link between the rising incidents of autism and statistical wireless proliferation.

Studies have been conducted to check genotoxicity in human beings as genes can be affected when exposed to EMF radiations. DNA integrity can also be affected by exposure to radio frequencies and electromagnetic radiations. He said foetal and neonatal exposure to radio frequencies can affect the unborn baby; the child may not be able to live up to his or her full genetic age. He said even male fertility is affected. When put in the pocket, the testes is exposed and sperms get deformed by this continuous exposure.

Clinical profile of EMF
The clinical profile of EMF radiations is very non-specific and sometimes may get misdiagnosed and treated for disorders like insomnia, depression, pain, muscle aches, neurological disorders and incidents of allergy.

“At the Deira City Centre (DCC) Clinic, we have evolved a protocol where we can assess a patients’ EMF exposure and can measure how much positive charge or voltage he has accumulated in his body,” said Dr Nehru.

saman@khaleejtimes.com

For more news from Khaleej Times, follow us on Facebook at facebook.com/khaleejtimes, and on Twitter at @khaleejtimes

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp?xfile=data/infocus/2014/June/infocus_June3.xml&section=infocus

Autism-relevant social abnormalities in mice exposed perinatally to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.

 2014 Jun 23. pii: S0736-5748(14)00092-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.06.010. [Epub ahead of print]

Autism-relevant social abnormalities in mice exposed perinatally to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.

Abstract

The incidence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has been rising, but the causes of ASD remain largely unidentified. Collective data have implicated the increased human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the increasing incidence of ASD. There are established biological effects of extremely low-frequency (ELF) EMF, but the relation to ASD is not investigated enough. In this study we examined the effects of perinatal exposure to ELF EMF on some ASD-relevant behavioral parameters in mice. The EMF was delivered via a Helmholtz coil pair. Male BALB/C mice were used and divided into exposed and control groups (n=8 and n=9, respectively). Tests were used to assess sociability, preference for social novelty, locomotion, anxiety, exploratory behavior, motor coordination, and olfaction. The examined mice were all males and exposed to EMF during the last week of gestation and for 7 days after delivery. The exposed mice demonstrated a lack of normal sociability and preference for social novelty while maintaining normal anxiety-like behavior, locomotion, motor coordination, and olfaction. Exposed mice also demonstrated decreased exploratory activity. We concluded that these results are supportive of the hypothesis of a causal link between exposure to ELF-EMF and ASD; however, replications of the study with further tests are recommended.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

KEYWORDS:

Anxiety; Autism spectrum disorder; Electromagnetic field; Motor coordination; Perinatal exposure; Social novelty
PMID:
 
24970316
 
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

MA Senate Considers Monsanto-like Wireless Utilities Bill

MA Senate Considers Monsanto-like Wireless Utilities Bill

Print

jenniferflanagan550
MA State Senator Jennifer Flanagan introduced the wireless utilities community-restrictive legislation Bill S 2183.

As the Massachusetts legislature approaches the end of its fiscal year, informed environmental advocates are warning residents of a Monsanto-like pro-industry bill before the Senate that will strip communities of the ability to regulate placement of wireless microwave antennas.

In a June 16 press release, the Massachusetts Municipal Association warned communities that the House already adopted a last-minute telecom/wireless industry amendment in economic development bill H 4181, Section 74 and 75.

Senator Jennifer Flanagan, a Democrat representing Worcester and Leominster, introduced the similar Bill S 2183 now being considered by the Senate. Quincy already passed a resolution in opposition on June 17th.

Who Is Going To Foot The Bill?
Worcester Opts Out has been engaged in a yearlong battle in Worcester, the site of National Grid’s $48M, 15,000 smart meter and WiMax pilot program that included 242 microwave antennas and 14 proposed towers. Wireless smart utility meters installed on homes and businesses enable two-way communication between the home and the utility, punitive time of use rates, and collection of private usage data by industry. The technology introduces four additional wireless networks into the community.

Despite the fact that the pilot has not yet proven that smart meters are a reasonable investment for ratepayers who will foot the estimated $7.6B bill, the MA Department of Public Utilities issued order 12-76-B on June 12 targeting wireless meters as the cornerstone to grid modernization.

DPU commissioner Anne Berwick is the wife of gubernatorial candidate Don Berwick, who endorses smart meters.

Cost, security, privacy, and safety concerns of ratepayers raised by the Office of Attorney General Martha Coakley, also a gubernatorial candidate, have been repeatedly dismissed by the DPU and the Patrick administration.

Opposition to Smart Metering Across the US
Across the country, smart metering has been wrought with controversy, with over 130 organizations in direct opposition due to security, privacy, health, cost, and green-washing issues. Sheffield MA residents voted for a moratorium by a sizeable majority at their town meeting on May 5. A class action lawsuit for health damages is underway in California. The Maine Supreme Court ruled that Maine’s Public Utilities Commission did not adequately address health concerns. The case is now under appeal. New Jersey is not deploying, and Ohio’s governor has put its renewable energy and efficiency requirements on hold.

Ten out of 28 European countries have concluded that smart meter roll-out is a poor value for the money.www.rtcc.org

Rate increases have already been approved in Illinois and Maine, with lawsuits stemming from overcharges and bills doubling and tripling after meter installation in Bakersfield, CA and other communities. Many states have been embroiled in contentious opt out battles after installation.

The MA legislature failed to act on bill H2926 to proactively protect MA ratepayers from mandatory installation and opt out fees. The MA DPU has already approved docket 13-83 enabling National Grid to surcharge customers opting out of wireless gas and AMR electric meters, thereby discriminating against medically vulnerable residents.

Towns Prohibited From Blocking Installation Due to Health or Environmental Concerns
 FortTorySubstation
The Tory Fort substation in a bucolic Worcester neighborhood has been the flashpoint for a contentious fight between residents, Worcester Opts Out, the utility, local government, and the MA DPU. The sub-station has been in violation of sound ordinances for over a year; industrial scale sound walls have been proposed. 
Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits communities from blocking installation of wireless infrastructure due to health or environmental concerns. In the Worcester pilot, the community challenged National Grid’s claim that TCA 1996 was applicable to the utility for an 80-foot tower installation with 5 antennas planned 70 feet from a home in a bucolic residential neighborhood, because the utility is not a telecom provider. National Grid recently received zoning authorization to install antennas on a water tower, and stated that it did not need approval for a church steeple installation 275 feet from a neighborhood elementary school because it was co-located.

According to Patricia Burke of HaltMAsmartmeters, a statewide consumer advocacy group, “It appears that the Worcester pilot formed the basis of Senator Flanagan’s bill to remove any impediments to the utility’s plan to saturate communities with its own radiofrequency transmitters. As happened in California, a telecom company will install the tower or an antenna under TCA 1996, then the utility will have free reign to co-locate additional antennas. The Rt. 2 corridor is currently being targeted. Once the initial approval is granted, the utility will co-locate. It’s a predatory model.”

Burke continued, “It’s a tragedy that the Worcester pilot was used to test the resistance by informed MA residents to what has been described as a devastating, wrong technology.”

As MA voters connect the dots to see who is supporting the utility industry, a trail of decision-based evidence making, political ambition and greed is emerging. Please invest a minute to ask officials to act on behalf of voters, not industry and lobbyists. Email your senator and your rep today. Also, contact your town officials (find website here) and demand they protect your town for tomorrow and tomorrows to come.

StopSmartMetersMassachusetts.org (Danvers) and its sister organization HaltMAsmartmeters.org oppose the installation of wireless utility meters.


Mobile Phone Radiation Confirmed to Damage Cells: Study

Monday, June 23, 2014

Mobile Phone Radiation Confirmed to Damage Cells: Study

Activist Post

The Ukrainian group of scientists around Igor Yakymenko at the Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology in Kiev consider it to be proven that mobile phone radiation leads to harmful oxidation processes in cells through the overproduction of free radicals. In the editorial "Low intensity radiofrequency radiation: a new oxidant for living cells" in the scientific journal Oxidants and Antioxidants in Medical Science of 29 March 2014 the group reported that of 80 studies, they had assessed, 92.5 % (= 76 studies) confirmed that mechanism of inflicting damage.

“Unexpectedly, a strong non-thermal character of biological effects” had been documented, the group of scientists wrote. Low intensity radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted by mobile phone end-user devices “could lead to mutagenic effects through expressive oxidative damage of DNA”, because “the substantial overproduction of ROS in living cells under low intensity RFR exposure could cause a broad spectrum of health disorders and diseases, including cancer in humans”.

Oxidative stress is considered to be the main cause of exhaustion, headaches, inflammatory diseases, all the way to heart attacks. The results of the scientists from Kiev explain the acutely critical nature of the hype around mobile phones, smartphones and Wi-Fi. According to latest statistics, children and young people use mobile phone end-user devices near their bodies on average for more than 8 hours a day. Therefore, they are permanently exposed to potential damage.

These findings once again strip the legitimacy of German and international legal limits, based on the guidelines by ICNIRP. The legal limits are based on the denial of such non-thermal effects.

These research results show, how – for the sake of profit – users are exposed to this radiation unprotected. The time of denial of non-thermal effects and the relativization of the current state of research in order to protect business interests must stop. Diagnose-Funk e.V. asks all scientists to confront public authorities with these study results, and to demand a change in favour of the precautionary principle.

Link and Download:

Fulltext Yakymenko et al. & Diagnose-Funk ‘Brennpunkt’: www.mobilfunkstudien.de +http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=154583
__________________________
1 Oxidative stress occurs when oxidative effects by free radicals (e.g. hydrogen peroxide) exceed the ability of antioxidant systems to neutralize them and the balance is in favor of oxidation. The damage in the cells can be oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids, proteins and DNA.

2 ROS ( Reactive Oxygen Species): Oxygen containing molecules that are highly unstable and highly interactive with other molecules. They are formed by the incomplete one-electron reduction of oxy- gen. They extract electrons from other molecules becoming radicals themselves. Thus a chain reac- tion is initiated which can cause cellular damage by oxidative stress. These ROS include superoxides, peroxides, hydroxyl radical and hypochlorous acid.

3 “Increasing incidence of burnout due to magnetic and electromagnetic fields of cell phone net- works and other wireless communication technologies”, Ulrich Warnke, Peter Hensinger, umwelt – medizin – gesellschaft | 26 | 1/2013, Download from http://mobilfunkstudien.de/dokumentationen/v-z/warnke-mobilfunk-foerdert-stress-und-burn- out.php

via: http://www.diagnose-funk.org/assets/df_pm_ros-yakymenko_engl_140414.pdf

Hat-tip:  C4ST.org

Hat-tip: Smart MetersUK

Related Activist Post Articles: 
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/06/mobile-phone-radiation-confirmed-to.html

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Radio Frequency Assault On Planet Earth’s Life Support Systems

Radio Frequency Assault On Planet Earth’s Life Support Systems

haarp clouds
Share
The clouds reveal an otherwise silent, lethal and constant assault on our biosphere. The extra low frequency (ELF) radio waves that are continuously bombarding the entire planet can be seen and easily recognized in cloud formations. The threat posed to the entire web of life from these frequencies cannot be overstated. My thanks to those who put together the 6 minute video below. The footage is exceptional, compelling and shocking. The total hindrance of Earth’s life support systems can and is pushing us all over the edge. Its time to make our collective voices heard, climate engineering must be exposed and halted or we will soon enough have nothing left to salvage of our once thriving planet.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Effect of 3G Cell Phone Exposure with Computer Controlled 2-D Stepper Motor on Non-thermal Activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK Stress Pathway in Rat Brain

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 347-358

Effect of 3G Cell Phone Exposure with Computer Controlled 2-D Stepper Motor on Non-thermal Activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK Stress Pathway in Rat Brain


Abstract

Cell phone radiation exposure and its biological interaction is the present concern of debate. Present study aimed to investigate the effect of 3G cell phone exposure with computer controlled 2-D stepper motor on 45-day-old male Wistar rat brain. Animals were exposed for 2 h a day for 60 days by using mobile phone with angular movement up to zero to 30°. The variation of the motor is restricted to 90° with respect to the horizontal plane, moving at a pre-determined rate of 2° per minute. Immediately after 60 days of exposure, animals were scarified and numbers of parameters (DNA double-strand break, micronuclei, caspase 3, apoptosis, DNA fragmentation, expression of stress-responsive genes) were performed. Result shows that microwave radiation emitted from 3G mobile phone significantly induced DNA strand breaks in brain. Meanwhile a significant increase in micronuclei, caspase 3 and apoptosis were also observed in exposed group (P < 0.05). Western blotting result shows that 3G mobile phone exposure causes a transient increase in phosphorylation of hsp27, hsp70, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK), which leads to mitochondrial dysfunction-mediated cytochrome c release and subsequent activation of caspases, involved in the process of radiation-induced apoptotic cell death. Study shows that the oxidative stress is the main factor which activates a variety of cellular signal transduction pathways, among them the hsp27/p38MAPK is the pathway of principle stress response. Results conclude that 3G mobile phone radiations affect the brain function and cause several neurological disorders.