Showing posts with label Infertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Infertility. Show all posts

Thursday, July 11, 2019

Study - 2.4 GHz Frequency Used in WiFi, Cell Phones, Baby Monitors, Etc., Damages Fertility -- What is Verizon's 35 GHz/5G Doing?

Study: Normal 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi Damages Fertility – What is Verizon’s 35 GHz, 5G Doing?
This is article number two in a series about 5G. We have no choice but to cover this because our friends and family in the Sacramento area are suffering from symptoms now, according to their firsthand accounts of nausea, headaches, and chest pains, from Natomas to downtown Sacramento.
If we’re going to understand Verizon’s 4-city rollout of 5G and the 23 city AT&T deployment, we have to understand what frequency WiFi currently operates at, and the consequences we’ve already been suffering from that.


One correction must be issued to the last article: most 4G, WiFi these days operates at a frequency of 2.45 GHz, or at maximum 5 GHz.
Verizon’s 5G, just installed in Sacramento, Houston, Indianapolis, and Los Angeles operates at between 28 GHz and 39 GHz. The headline of this article said 35 GHz in particular because that’s in the middle of their spectrum, and studies have shown 35 GHz frequencies seem to cause immune system problems in rats.
The last article said WiFi usually operates below 1 GHz, because we paraphrased the misleading info provided by Verizon. The truth is more complicated: “4G LTE,” the phone data we use, is supposed to be between under 1 GHz and 3.8 GHz. But what happens if someone uses a WiFi hotspot on their 4G phone, does that make the frequency 2.45 GHz?
The question gets complicated, but regardless of the answer, this entire frequency band we’re currently being exposed to seems to be fueling a global infertility crisis.
That’s actually not an exaggeration, we’re living through a global infertility crisis. That’s another topic and one we’ll cover in the future: just type “infertility crisis” into your search engine, set it to “news” and watch what comes up.
There are a lot, and I mean a lot of studies linking the current WiFi that operates around 2.4 GHz to infertility and other immediately noticeable symptoms.
For this article however, we’ve chosen one study performed in Iran, published in the journal Cell in 2015.
The study is titled “Effects of Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz) Exposure on Apoptosis, Sperm Parameters and Testicular Histomorphometry in Rats: A Time Course Study.”


It’s an excellent, straightforward and rich but not too complicated paper, explaining that we need to know the consequences of being saturated in 2.45 GHz radio-frequency radiation.
It was conducted at the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, in Zanjan, Iran, from June to August 2014.
In the study, three-month old Wistar rats were exposed to the 2.45 GHz radiation, sadly, in a chamber that contained two Wi-Fi antennas on opposite walls.
The animals were divided into three categories: a control group with healthy, non Wi-Fi exposed animals, a group exposed to the Wi-Fi for 1 hour a day for two months, and a third group that was exposed to Wi-Fi for 7 hours a day for 2 months.
All the animals were studied, for their sperm parameters, capase-3 concentrations, and histomorphometric changes in their testicles, as well as the apoptotic indexes of the animals.
The study concluded that both the 1 hour exposed and 7 hour a day exposed animals showed a decrease in sperm parameters.
Even a small amount of Wi-Fi exposure per day on a regular basis damages the sperm of mice, the study proved.
It concluded, very clearly:
The paper went as far as to say:
Decline in male fertility has been considered a major concern during the past several decades, they said.
They found that direct or indirect exposure to these frequencies, as a main environmental factor, plays a dominant role in the decline of fertility, that has been concretely observed.
WiFi is influencing a global infertility crisis, and the frequencies are being raised, with cell units closer to our heads and bodies.
Now here’s where modern Wi-Fi gets completely insane: 2.4 GHz is the exact frequency a microwave oven uses to cook things.
Our Wi-Fi is currently the exact same frequency microwaves cook our food with, there is absolutely no difference between the two except for the concentrated power in a microwave oven to focus the frequencies.


What does it mean that our current Wi-Fi is already literally cooking us, like low power microwave ovens, on the exact same 2.4 GHz frequency? What does it mean that it’s about to be raised to the millimeter wave band?
This is a model of where a 5G unit will be placed in Houston, but it’s unrealistic because those little cells are going to be installed much closer to our heads, on small buildings and poles.


This is a more realistic photo.


Sacramento, Houston, Indianapolis, and Los Angeles residents are going to have to watch out for that 5G, and soon 23 more cities will have it in America. For more info on what cities will have it, read part 1 on our 5G series here.
Please go out of your way to share this information with as many people as possible. It’s that, or helplessly watch our environment, workplaces, schools, be saturated in higher frequencies that do even more noticeable damage.

Friday, June 28, 2019

Role of Mitochondria in the Oxidative Stress Induced by Electromagnetic Fields: Focus on Reproductive Systems

. 2018; 2018: 5076271.

Although we reported contradictory data due to lack of uniformity in the experimental designs, a growing body of evidence suggests that EMF exposure during spermatogenesis induces increased ROS production associated with decreased ROS scavenging activity. Numerous studies revealed the detrimental effects of EMFs from mobile phones, laptops, and other electric devices on sperm quality and provide evidence for extensive electron leakage from the mitochondrial electron transport chain as the main cause of EMF damage. In female reproductive systems, the contribution of oxidative stress to EMF-induced damages and the evidence of mitochondrial origin of ROS overproduction are reported, as well. In conclusion, mitochondria seem to play an important role as source of ROS in both male and female reproductive systems under EMF exposure. Future and more standardized studies are required for a better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying EMF potential challenge to our reproductive system in order to improve preventive strategies.


Wednesday, May 08, 2019

Trying for kids? Wifi devices lower your chances, new study shows



Hong Kong - A new study has found that exposure to Wifi connections lowers male fertility rates and reduces couples' chances of having children by killing sperm, adding to mounting evidence that electromagnetic waves are harmful.
The Japanese study, carried out between August and November last year on 51 men, is reportedly the first such trial that focuses on the effects of electromagnetic waves from Wifi devices such as mobile phones and home routers on sperm motion and death.
Researcher Kumiko Nakata, from the Reproductive Medicine Research Centre at Yamashita Shonan Yume Clinic, noted that electromagnetic waves have been said to be safe for humans, in terms of health and wellbeing.
But her study showed that prolonged exposure to the waves from Wifi devices lowered male fertility.
"Our study has shown that over a relatively short time, a Wifi shield can offer some protection from the harmful effects of the electromagnetic waves," she said.
"However, there is mounting evidence that the effects of electromagnetic waves on sperm may be having a significant effect on human reproduction."
The men in the study, whose average age came to 38.4 years, were involved in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) or artificial insemination procedures at the Yamashita Shonan Yume Clinic in Japan.

Sperm samples were taken from them and split into three groups - those whose samples were not exposed to electromagnetic waves from a Wifi router, those whose sperm were protected by a small shield that intercepted the waves, and those whose sperm were fully exposed to the waves.
Ms Nakata, who specialises in embryology and spermatology, said the sperm samples were placed near a pocket Wifi router, in the way that a mobile phone would be carried in a man's trousers.
The sperm were exposed to electromagnetic waves from the Wifi router for lengths of 30 minutes, 60 minutes, two hours, and 24 hours. Sperm motion was then tested.
While there was little difference in sperm motility rates between the different groups after exposures of 30 minutes and 60 minutes, the study found that the longer the exposure, the lower the sperm motility rate and higher the death rate.
"After 24 hours, the dead sperm rate of the group that was not exposed to the waves was 8.4 per cent, the Wifi shield group was 18.2 per cent, and the exposed group was 23.3 per cent, with the latter being significantly higher," said Ms Nakata.
Scientists say sperm counts and motility rates have gone down in the past 40 years, a result of a combination of reasons such as exposure to chemicals, pollution, stress and unhealthy diet.
The World Health Organisation predicts that infertility among males and females will be the third most serious condition after cancer and cardiovascular diseases in the 21st century.
In the Asia-Pacific region of four billion people, representing about 60 per cent of the global population, the implications of this forecast are enormous, experts have agreed.
"The environment that we live and work in is dense in electromagnetic waves. For now, until further research develops people should be aware of potential problems especially when living and working in places with a high electromagnetic presence, around those powerful devices," said Ms Nakata.
The study was a collaboration between the Reproductive Medicine Research Centre at Yamashita Shonan Yume Clinic and the Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences at the University of Yamanashi.
It will be shared at the Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction (ASPIRE 2019) Congress, which runs from May 2 to May 5 in Hong Kong.
Some 1,600 participants comprising scientists, clinicians, embryologists, nurses and IVF counsellors are expected to discuss topics including male infertility and fertility preservation.