Thursday, October 02, 2014

Naperville’s Kim Bendis emerges victorious in dubious “smart meter arrest” case

Naperville’s Kim Bendis emerges victorious in dubious “smart meter arrest” case

by Josh del Sol, director & producer of Take Back Your Power
Kim Bendis and Naperville Smart Meter Awareness
Kim Bendis (second from left, pictured with members of Naperville Smart Meter Awareness) was victorious in an Illinois court on Wednesday.
After having been absurdly arrested for refusing a so-named “smart” electricity meter (as seen in Take Back Your Power), Kim Bendis of Naperville, Illinois has been acquitted on a misdemeanor charge labelled as “resisting or obstructing a peace officer” in January 2013.
Bendis’ other charge, which police called “attempted eavesdropping,” was dropped in Februarywhen that Illinois law was ruled unconstitutional.  The baseless charge against Jen Stahl, the other Naperville mom arrested, was also dropped.
Hundreds of local governments and an estimated million or more utility customers around the world are opposing utilities’ actions to deploy “smart” meters – for the valid reasons of privacy violations, unjustifiable billing increasesfireshacking vulnerability and health damage.  “Smart” meters appear to be linked to an agenda of increased centralized control, price-gouging and causing various harms to people in their own homes.  They are being deployed worldwide, often in the name of a necessary “climate action” initiative, although studies fail to show any energy savings.
But in many areas utilities are not even offering their customers a choice to keep themselves from being harmed by “smart” meters.  And in Naperville, the City has appeared hell-bent to force its agenda ahead, going as far as employing police forces to carry out their dirty work.

Overcoming propaganda

With no less than 4 mugshot images of Bendis embedded in a single postyesterday’s Chicago Tribune article used blatant propaganda to further cement her “poster girl” status, attempting to send a not-so-subtle message of, “this is what happens when you resist us.”  This is a deliberate and blatant attempt at the embedding of fear through biased and repetitive images.
No word yet if Bendis will go on the offensive against the City of Naperville, for compensation for the harms she experienced as part of the ordeal.
“These charges should have never been brought,” Bendis’ attorney Todd Pugh said after the verdict.
That’s the understatement of the year.

What this means for all of us

Bendis’ victory shows that the corporately-run government complex does falter when individuals stand their ground and refuse the fear programs which the complex feeds on, and uses against human beings.
But don’t expect courts to help prevent “smart” meters from being installed.  Unfortunately, the judicial system is not immune to what appears to be corporate bribery and collusion.  Despite the overwhelming evidence of harm caused by “smart” meters, we’ve repeatedly seen legal processes fail, most recently with Citizens for Safe Technology’s class action case dismissal by the BC Human Rights Tribunal, and last week a U.S District judge ruling against Florida utility customers.
So, while jury trials may be somewhat more effective (than an administrative judge ruling) in seeking justice and the preservation of individual rights, success in the movement appears to require other avenues on higher ground.
As we necessarily wake up and move through fear, let us have confidence that, like Kim Bendis, we can stand up for ourselves and win.
I see this movement reaching higher ground as we begin to understand our power to create, to dispel the illusion and to enforce liability upon criminals who are causing harm.  The spirit in us compels us toward victory.

Take Back Your Power bolt - 100
About the author

mug-joshJosh del Sol is the director and producer of Take Back Your Power, a revelatory documentary feature film uncovering the worldwide ‘smart’ metering and grid agenda. Watch the film and subscribe to updates at www.takebackyourpower.net, and follow him via twitter @TBYPfilm.

Other articles by Josh del Sol

Repost OK: This article may be reposted anywhere, as long as it is left unchanged and attribution is given which includes a link to www.takebackyourpower.net.

Wednesday, October 01, 2014

BioInitiative Member Letter Expressing Concern About Views Expressed by Wireless Company CEOs

BioInitiative Member Letter Expressing Concern About Views Expressed by Wireless Company CEOs



September 22, 2014

On behalf of the BioInitative Working Group, we are writing to express our concern about the views expressed by CEOs from Google, Dell, Apple, Adobe, eBay, Facebook, the George Lucas Educational Foundation and others to the FCC supporting wireless technologies in schools.
Your letter to the FCC dated July 7, 2014 titled Education Superhighway, states:
“Today, we are writing to you to urge swift bi-partisan action at your July 11, 2014 meeting to adopt the E-Rate modernization proposal set forth by Chairman Wheeler.” “By responsibly investing $2 billion of unused funds and providing predictable ongoing support for Wi-Fi, the plan will make dramatic progress in bringing high-speed connectivity to our classrooms.”
No one denies that bringing high-speed connectivity to our classrooms is important. But it can be a wired connection and does not have to be WiFi. It does not reflect well on the ethics of your corporations to encourage the FCC to provide $2 billion dollars for new wireless classroom infrastructure and devices for school children, knowing that wireless emissions have been classified as a Possible Human Carcinogen by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (2011). To promote wireless technologies in schools is to
deliberately and knowingly disregard current health warnings from international science and
public health experts.
Saturating schools with wireless technology will likely create unnecessary liability for municipalities and result in a loss of public trust and confidence in the corporations that push their wireless products with a blind eye toward health concerns.
Epidemiological studies show links between radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure and cancers, neurological disorders, hormonal changes, symptoms of electrical hypersensitivity (EHS) and more. Laboratory studies show that RFR exposure increases risk of cancer, abnormal sperm, learning and memory deficits, and heart irregularities. Fetal exposures in both animal and human studies result in altered brain development in the young offspring, with disruption in learning, memory and behavior. The brain development of a fetus can be impaired by in-utero exposure to a pregnant woman. The evidence for these statements is based on hundreds of published, peerreviewed
scientific studies that report adverse effects at levels much lower than current FCC public safety limits. WiFi is schools, in contrast to wired internet connections, will increase risk of neurologic impairment and long-term risk of cancer in students. Corporations cannot avoid responsibility simply by asserting compliance with existing legal, but outdated and inadequate FCC public safety limits.
Today, corporations that deal with educational technology should be looking forward and helping school administrators and municipal leaders to access safe, wired solutions. Your corporations can reasonably foresee and offer alternatives to potentially hazardous exposures to wireless radiation by choosing to support wired educational technologies.
Thank you for your attention to this letter.
Cindy Sage, MA, Tel: (805) 969-0557 Email: sage@silcom.com
David O. Carpenter, MD, Tel: 518-­‐525-­‐2660 Email: dcarpenter@albany.edu
Co-Editors, BioInitiative 2012 Report For the BioInitiative Working Group
Copies: CEOs signing Education Superhighway letter to the FCC
Federal Communications Commission
The White House, President Obama
US Secretary of Education Secretary Arne Duncan
Contributing Authors of the the 2007 and 2012 BioInitiative Working Groups
Jitendra Behari, PhD, India
Carlo V. Bellieni, MD, Italy
Igor Belyaev, Dr.Sc., Slovak Republic
Carl F. Blackman, PhD, USA
Martin Blank, PhD, USA
Michael Carlberg, MSc, Sweden
David O Carpenter, MD, USA
Zoreh Davanipour, DVM, PhD USA
Adamantia F. Fragopoulou, PhD, Greece
David Gee, Denmark
Yuri Grigoriev, MD, Russia
Kjell Hansson Mild, PhD, Sweden
Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Sweden
Martha Herbert, PhD, MD, USA
Paul Héroux, PhD, Canada
Michael Kundi, PhD, Austria
Henry Lai, PhD, USA
Ying Li, PhD, Canada
Abraham R. Liboff, PhD, USA
Lukas H. Margaritis, PhD, Greece
Henrietta Nittby, MD, PhD, Sweden
Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Austria
Bertil R. Persson, PhD, MD, Sweden
Iole Pinto, PhD, Italy
Paulraj Rajamani, PhD, India
Cindy Sage, MA, USA
Leif Salford, MD, PhD, Sweden
Eugene Sobel, PhD, USA
Amy Thomsen, MPH, MSPAS, USA

[Idiopathic environmental intolerance: 2 disabling entities to recognize].

 2014 Mar;64(3):358-62.

[Idiopathic environmental intolerance: 2 disabling entities to recognize].

[Article in French]

Abstract

Idiopathic environmental intolerance is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms involving several organs within the same individual, and attributed to the exposure to chemical odors (multiple chemical sensitivities) or to the exposure to electromagnetic fields (electromagnetic hypersensitivity). Symptoms occur following an exposure to agents generally regarded as harmless due to the low levels of exposure, and they do not answer to any definition of organic diseases. The lack of established etiology renders treatment difficult. It is important for practitioner to recognize such disorders and assess the social and professional impact so as to improve patients' quality of life.
PMID:
 
24851372
 
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Londoners Unwittingly Exchange First Born Children For Free Wi-Fi

Londoners Unwittingly Exchange First Born Children For Free Wi-Fi


Signed agreement that included a "Herod Clause," in experiment designed to show dangers of unguarded Wi-Fi hotspots

Not reading the small print could mean big problems, as a handful of Londoners who accidentally signed away their first born children in exchange for access to free Wi-Fi recently found out.

An experiment organized by the Cyber Security Research Institute was conducted in some of the busiest neighborhoods in London and intended to highlight the major risks associated with public Wi-Fi networks.

In June, researchers set up a Wi-Fi hotspot that promised network access to users who agreed to a set of terms and conditions. These included a “Herod Clause” offering free Wi-Fi if the user agreed to hand over their eldest child “for the duration of eternity.” The page was disabled after six people signed up.

Finnish security firm F-Secure, which sponsored the research, said it had decided not to enforce the clause. “As this is an experiment, we will be returning the children to their parents,” wrote the Finnish company in its report. “While terms and conditions are legally binding, it is contrary to public policy to sell children in return for free services, so the clause would not be enforceable in a court of law.”

The company urged people to take Wi-Fi security more seriously. Sean Sullivan, security advisor at F-Secure, told The Guardian: “People are thinking of Wi-Fi as a place as opposed to an activity…You don’t do unprotected Wi-Fi at home, why are you doing it in public?”


Group fights siting of cell towers on schools' grounds

Group fights siting of cell towers on schools' grounds

Wednesday - 9/24/2014, 4:51am  ET



CELL_PROTEST.jpeg

Parents and students gathered on Tuesday in front of the Prince George's County Board of Education building in Upper Marlboro. (WTOP/Michelle Basch)

WASHINGTON -- More and more cellphone towers are going up on the grounds of schools, but a new group has formed to fight the trend in the D.C. region.

Citizens, homeowners and parents from Montgomery, Prince George's, Anne Arundel and Baltimore counties have formed a group called the Maryland Coalition Against Cell Towers on Schools. They want all cellphone tower construction on school grounds in the state to stop immediately.

They cite the possibility that kids are being exposed to radiation. 

"We have no proof of safety, and until we have proof of safety, why would we put it on our children," said parent Thea Scarato at a news conference Tuesday night in front of the Prince George's County Board of Education building in Upper Marlboro, Maryland. 

They're also concerned about the materials stored at tower sites. 

"Cell towers turn school grounds into haz-mat sites, with diesel generators and lead batteries," said homeowner David Keaton. 

The group has put together a list of 25 reasons to keep cell towers off school grounds.

The coalition has launched a petition drive and is looking at other ways to take action. 

The Maryland Association of Boards of Education has teamed up with Milestone Communications to bring cellphone towers to the grounds of public schools in the state. 

Milestone's website reads: "Our mission is to create recurring revenue opportunities for school systems and increase wireless capacity through developing wireless towers when and where they are needed." 
Follow @WTOP on Twitter and WTOP on Facebook.

© 2014 WTOP. All Rights Reserved.



Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3708161/Group-fights-siting-of-cell-towers-on-schools-grounds#ixzz3GY0B7opD

Exclusive: Top 10 Flashlight Apps Are Stealing Your Data, Even Pics Off Your Phone

Exclusive: Top 10 Flashlight Apps Are Stealing Your Data, Even Pics Off Your Phone

By: Ben Swann 
Ben Swann talks with the CEO of Snoopwall About How Flashlight Apps With Half a Billion Downloads Are Stealing Your Private Information
Nashua NH- The makers of some of the most widely used flashlight apps for smart phones are doing more than just helping you find your lost car keys, they are geo-locating you and stealing your data. At least, that is the claim being made by Snoopwall LLC. Snoopwall is the world’s first “counterveillance” company and according the founder, Gary Miliefsky in a web exclusive interview with Benswann.com, the top ten flashlight apps are stealing you data. 
Snoopwall has just released a THREAT ASSESSMENT REPORT
Summarizing privacy and risk Analysis of top 10 Android flashlight Apps. According to Snoopwall, all of the top 10 apps are doing more than what consumers are expecting from a flashlight. For instance, the number 1 flashlight app for Android is the “Super Bright LED Flashlight”. This app has between 100 million and 500 million installs worldwide. So what does the app actually have the ability to do?
• retrieve running apps
• modify or delete the contents of your USB storage
• test access to protected storage
• take pictures and videos
• view Wi-Fi connections
• read phone status and identity
• receive data from Internet
• control flashlight
• change system display settings
• modify system settings
• prevent device from sleeping
• view network connections
• full network access
Others like the Brightest Flashlight Free App, have been sued by the FTC . According to Snoopwall, “But while the FTC.gov has gone after Flashlight Free App, it seems they are still at it and the other 9, as well.  It seems time to ask “where’s the outrage?” – shouldn’t you UNINSTALL your FLASHLIGHT APP today?  The answer is yes!  You might also want to contact the FTC and tell them you are concerned.”
If you are looking for a flashlight app that won’t steal your information, Snoopwall is providing a solution.

Airlines ordered to replace 1,300 Boeing cockpit displays over Wi-Fi interference

Airlines ordered to replace 1,300 Boeing cockpit displays over Wi-Fi interference

The Federal Aviation Administration is requiring airlines to replace cockpit displays on more than 1,300 Boeing airplanes to avoid interference from Wi-Fi and cellular devices.
Airlines will need to replace certain cockpit display units made by Honeywell used on Boeing's 737 and 777 jets within five years, according to an FAA document
The FAA said the display units were susceptible to interference from Wi-Fi frequencies. Independent tests conducted by the agency and Boeing  showed blanking on the screens when Wi-Fi devices were used near them.
The displays also are susceptible to transmissions from mobile phones, weather radar and mobile satellite communications, the FAA said.
Honeywell spokesman Steve Brecken said no display units had blanked during flight because of Wi-Fi interference. 
"The only known occurrence was during a developmental test conducted on the ground. We worked with Boeing and addressed any concerns in 2012 with new display hardware," he said.
The display units provide crucial flight information including airspeed, altitude and navigation information, and cost thousands of dollars each. Replacing all the units is expected to cost airlines nearly $14 million, according to the FAA document.
"Boeing made these recommendations to operators in November 2012. The FAA's directives make them mandatory," Boeing spokesman Miles Kotay said.
A number of airlines and Honeywell asked the FAA to delay or reduce the effects of the directive, but the regulator said the move was necessary to avoid loss of information during take-offs or landings, which could result in "loss of airplane control at an altitude insufficient for recovery."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-boeing-cockpit-displays-20140930-story.html