Further FCC Assault on Local Zoning - Join Coalition to Fight Proposed Expansion of OTARD Rule

Via Best Best & Krieger, Attorneys at Law

The Federal Communications Commission is once again seeking to usurp local authority as part of its agenda for 5G deployment. Last week, the FCC requested comments on a proposal to expand its Over-the-Air Reception Devices Rule. If approved, the Rule would limit localities’ authority to regulate placement of hub and relay antennas of a certain size — regardless of whether an occupant at the site where the equipment is deployed is using the network. In doing so, the FCC seeks to extend a Congressional directive that protects consumers’ right to install satellite dishes (Telecommunications Act of 1996 section 207) to network elements that would otherwise be subject to zoning oversight. Best Best & Krieger LLP is inviting agencies to join a coalition in objecting to this zoning authority encroachment.

First adopted in 1999, the OTARD Ruleprohibits state and local governments from restricting consumers from installing over-the-air devices to receiveover-the-air signals. If a consumer feels that a local rule or ordinance limits the ability to install such a device, a complaint can be filed with the FCC in an effort to force the local government to suspend all enforcement action. But the Rule was designed to solely protect equipment at the consumer’s end: small antennas (1 meter in diameter or less) installed on property within the exclusive use or control of the satellite’s user.

Now, the FCC is proposing to extend these protections to hub and relay antennas — equipment 5G providers will use to transmitsignals to, and receive signals from, multiple customer locations. This is particularly problematic for local governments because the Rule’s effect may permit 5G providers to install the antennas without notifying local agencies or being subject to local community control.

This is not the first time the FCC has expanded the OTARD Rule. In 2000, the Rule was extended from television programming devices to “fixed wireless” antennas and, in 2004, it was extended to protect equipment capable of processing network functionality. But in both cases, the equipment installed had to be used to serve a user at the premises. This proposal eliminates the on-premises user requirement.

Comments will be due 30 days from publication in the Federal Register, which is expected to occur at any time. 

 [View source.]