Pall notes that ARPANSA provided “not one iota of evidence that its exposure standard is based on scientific research or that it protects us from any, let alone all harmful effects nor that it protects people of all ages and health status against all known adverse effects of RF (the word they are using for microwave frequency) exposures”. Professor Pall pointed out that by ignoring 158 bodies of evidence ARPANSA completely fails in its responsibility to protect the health of Australians. He goes on to say that, in general, “ARPANSA makes grandiose claims that are both undocumented and found to be false or, at best highly questionable when one examines the scientific literature”.
Professor Pall raised a number of questions for ARPANSA in his response. He asked ARPANSA to provide answers to these questions within three weeks of receiving his letter.
The public of Australia awaits ARPANSA’s response…….
No comments:
Post a Comment